HoSAGE: sarcopenia in older patient with intermediate / high-risk prostate cancer, prevalence and incidence after androgen deprivation therapy: study protocol for a cohort trial.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is defined by a loss of muscle strength associated to a decrease in skeletal muscle mass. Ageing greatly contributes to sarcopenia as may many other factors such as cancer or androgen deprivation therapies (ADT). This cohort study aims to evaluate (1) the prevalence of muscle disorders and sarcopenia in older patients before initiation of intermediate to high risk prostate cancer treatment with ADT and radiotherapy, and (2) the occurrence and/or aggravation of muscle disorders and sarcopenia at the end of cancer treatment. METHODS: This cohort study is monocentric and prospective. The primary objectives are to determine the risk factor of sarcopenia prevalence and to study the relationship between ADT and sarcopenia incidence, in patients 70 years and older with histologically proven localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, addressed to a geriatrician (G8 score ≤14) for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in Marseille University Hospital. Secondary objectives encompass, measurement of sarcopenia clinical criteria along prostate oncological treatment; evaluation of the quality of life of patients with sarcopenia; evaluation of the impact of socio-behavioral and anthropological factors on sarcopenia evolution and incidence; finally the evaluation of the impact of ADT exposure on sarcopenia. Sarcopenia prevalence was estimated to be between 20 and 30%, therefore the study will enroll 200 patients. DISCUSSION: The current guidelines for older patients with prostate cancer recommend a pelvic radiotherapy treatment associated to variable duration (6 to 36 months) of ADT. However ADT impacts muscle mass and could exacerbate the risks of sarcopenia. Our study intends to assess the specific effect of ADT on sarcopenia incidence and/or worsening as well as to estimate sarcopenia prevalence in this population. The results of this cohort trial will lead to a better understanding of sarcopenia prevalence and incidence necessary to further elaborate a prevention plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered to the French drug and device regulation agency under the number 2019-A02319-48, before beginning the study (11/12/2019). The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT04484246, registration on the ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04484246 ).

Prognostic Risk Classification for Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival in Oligometastatic Recurrent Prostate Cancer Determined by Choline PET.

BACKGROUND: Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new imaging technique for the detection of oligometastatic (OM) prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after initial OM diagnoses; treatment, particularly metastasis-directed therapy (MDT); and determine risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-center, retrospective study included patients with hormone-sensitive biological relapse after local treatment with curative intent and with fewer than six choline PET/CT metastases. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Risk groups were based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.8 ng/mL and metastatic sites at OM cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Between October 2012 and December 2016, 177 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 49.02 months. The median bRFS was 39.74 months. In multivariate analyses, bone metastases and PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL were associated with worse bRFS. Four risk groups (I to IV; hazard ratio [HR], 5.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-26.61) were observed, with median bRFS not reached for group I (PSA < 0.8 ng/mL; node metastasis [M1a]), a 40.00-month bRFS for group II (PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL; M1a), 29.97-month bRFS for group III (bone metastasis [M1b], whatever the PSA level); and 22.70-month bRFS for group IV (PSA > 0.8 ng/mL and visceral metastasis [M1c]). MDT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improved bRFS over MDT alone (48.36 vs. 34.16 months; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.38-3.26), particularly for group II (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.09-4.00), and reached a limit of significance for group III (HR, ;3.79 95% CI, 0.88- 16.38). CONCLUSION: Prognostic group classifications were confirmed: PSA < 0.8 ng/mL and M1a showed a better outcome than patients with M1c and PSA ≥ 0.8 ng/mL. These results could facilitate patient selection for prospective clinical trials in OM prostate cancer.

Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Associated to Conformal Radiotherapy in the Treatment of D'Amico Intermediate-/High-Risk Prostate Cancer in Older Patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The association of 3D Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy (3D-CEBRT) with adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) proved to treat patients with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer (IR and HR). However, older patients were underrepresented in literature. We aimed to report the oncological results and morbidity 3D-CEBRT +ADT in ≥80 years patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 1998 to July 2017, 101 patients ≥80 years were included in a tertiary center. The median age was 82 years. ADT was initiated 3 months prior 3D-CEBRT in all patients, with a total duration of 6 months for IR prostate cancer (group A; n = 41) and 15 months for HR prostate cancer (group B; n = 60). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (DMFS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and toxicity. RESULTS: Five years-OS was 95% and 86.7% in groups A and B, respectively. Cardiovascular events occurred in 22.8% of ≥80 years patients with no impact on OS. In the multivariate analysis, age <82 years, Karnofsky index and normalization of testosterone levels were significantly associated with better OS. CONCLUSION: Age ≥80 years should not be a limitation for the treatment of IR and HR prostate cancer patients with 3D-CEBRT and ADT, but cardiovascular monitoring and prevention are mandatory.

Filgrastim prophylaxis in elderly cancer patients in the real-life setting: a French multicenter observational study, the TULIP study.

PURPOSE: Few studies are currently available among elderly patients, justifying the need for better understanding of daily medical practices in terms of use of growth factors to prevent chemotherapy (CT)-induced neutropenia. The primary objective of this study was to describe the use of filgrastim in the elderly. METHODS: Cancer patients aged 65 years and above, undergoing CT and initiating a prophylactic treatment with filgrastim, were enrolled. Patients were followed according to routine medical practice from filgrastim initiation until the end of the CT or after a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred nineteen evaluable patients were documented in the study (mean age 73.9 ± 6.2 years, 52.1% men). The majority were suffering from solid tumor (73%) with ECOG 0-1 for 80% of them. Approximately two-third had a global risk for FN ≥ 20%, and one third < 20%. Through all CT cycles, no differences were observed between age classes ([65-74], [75-85], or > 85) in dose, duration, and time to first injection from CT start. Most patients (84%) received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 70% were administered during the first CT cycle. The median time from CT start until filgrastim was 4 days. The median duration of filgrastim treatment was 5 days. Dose reductions and CT delays were less frequent in patients receiving PP (4.8% and 7.1% respectively) than secondary prophylaxis (9.2% and 13.3% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Filgrastim use was consistent with French Market Authorization terms. No difference was shown compared with younger patients. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile.

Impact of radiation oncology practice on pain: a cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of pain in our radiotherapy (RT) department. The impact of RT practice on pain and pain management were analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 126 patients, 93 (73.8%) completed the questionnaire proposed in this survey. It was designed to assess the proportion of patients experiencing pain in the department, the impact of RT practice on pain, and patients' estimate of the quality of management of their pain by the medical staff. Pain intensity and patient satisfaction were assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 66 experienced pain during RT, 13 of whom were totally relieved by analgesic treatment. The mean pain intensity was 3.9 (SD 2.3). A total of 26 patients had a numeric rating >/=4, indicating that their pain was not sufficiently treated. The objective length of waiting time for a session, transportation, and mobilization for session positioning worsened the pain of a substantial proportion of patients. A total of 56% of patients had a favorable opinion about pain management in our department. A high percentage (72.2%) of patients found that the time spent by the medical staff for pain management was inadequate, and 54.5% believed that the psychological support they received was insufficient. Personnel in the RT department remained the primary source of information regarding pain control. However, 17.5% of patients did not report their pain or talked about it to non-health care professionals. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pain was high in the department. The specific practice of RT worsened pain and nearly one-half of patients were not satisfied with its management. The necessity for medical staff to be more available was highlighted by patients.