RESUMEN
For locally advanced cervical cancer, the standard therapeutic approach involves concomitant chemoradiation therapy, supplemented by a brachytherapy boost. Moreover, an external beam radiotherapy (RT) boost should be considered for treating gross lymph node (LN) volumes. Two boost approaches exist with Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): Sequential (SEQ) and Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB). This study undertakes a comprehensive dosimetric and radiobiological comparison between these two boost strategies. The study encompassed ten patients who underwent RT for cervical cancer with node-positive disease. Two sets of treatment plans were generated for each patient: SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT. Dosimetric as well as radiobiological parameters including tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were compared. Both techniques were analyzed for two different levels of LN involvement - only pelvic LNs and pelvic with para-aortic LNs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 25.0. SIB-VMAT exhibited superior target coverage, yielding improved doses to the planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumour volume (GTV). Notably, SIB-VMAT plans displayed markedly superior dose conformity. While SEQ-VMAT displayed favorable organ sparing for femoral heads, SIB-VMAT appeared as the more efficient approach for mitigating bladder and bowel doses. TCP was significantly higher with SIB-VMAT, suggesting a higher likelihood of successful tumour control. Conversely, no statistically significant difference in NTCP was observed between the two techniques. This study's findings underscore the advantages of SIB-VMAT over SEQ-VMAT in terms of improved target coverage, dose conformity, and tumour control probability. In particular, SIB-VMAT demonstrated potential benefits for cases involving para-aortic nodes. It is concluded that SIB-VMAT should be the preferred approach in all cases of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Asunto(s)
Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Femenino , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radiometría , Persona de Mediana Edad , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Metástasis Linfática/radioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) are associated with increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, data regarding the association between low SMM and NAFLD-related liver fibrosis in individuals with T2D are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between low SMM and liver fibrosis in individuals with T2D and NAFLD. METHODS: Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) of ≥ 248 dB/m was taken as cutoff suggesting NAFLD. Clinically relevant liver fibrosis and advanced liver fibrosis were defined as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) of ≥ 8.0 and ≥ 9.6 kPa, respectively. SMM was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Low SMM was defined as appendicular SMM index of < 7.0 kg/m2 for men and < 5.4 kg/m2 for women. RESULTS: Of the 487 consecutive patients with T2D, 366 (75.1%) had NAFLD. Among individuals with NAFLD, 118 (32.2%) and 64 (17.5%) had clinically relevant liver fibrosis and advanced liver fibrosis, respectively. Low SMM was diagnosed in 78 (21.3%) individuals with NAFLD. Patients with low SMM were older (56.1 vs 52.8 years) and had longer duration of diabetes (10.3 vs 8.1 years). Low SMM was an independent risk factor associated with clinically relevant liver fibrosis (P = 0.002) and advanced liver fibrosis (P ≤ 0.0001). Associations between low SMM and clinically relevant- and advanced liver fibrosis were maintained even after sequential adjustment for confounding variables through the multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Low SMM is independently associated with liver fibrosis in individuals with T2D and NAFLD.