RESUMEN
Dengue neurological disease is an uncommon yet severe complication of dengue infection. It can manifest as encephalitis, encephalopathy, neuro-ophthalmic complications, or neuromuscular disorders. Severe infection can result in viral shedding across multiple body sites. We describe a case of severe neuro-ophthalmic dengue infection in an otherwise healthy returned traveller, presenting with prolonged multiple-body-site viral detections by PCR. The dengue virus (DENV) dynamics and serological response support a direct DENV neuropathogenicity. A retrospective review of the laboratory data at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) suggests that blood is the most frequent sample type with DENV detection (92% of all DENV-positive samples). Genotype variation is seen across different sample types. The similarity of CSF and nasopharyngeal DENV subtypes (genotype 1 and 3) suggests a possible correlation between nasopharyngeal replication and neurological complications. The case presented highlights the direct neuropathogenicity of DENV early in the course of infection, and a potential correlation between nasopharyngeal replication and neurological disease.
Asunto(s)
Virus del Dengue , Dengue , Humanos , Dengue/virología , Dengue/diagnóstico , Virus del Dengue/genética , Virus del Dengue/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Genotipo , Adulto , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients requiring admission to the general medicine wards in a public hospital are usually assessed by a medical registrar. This study is based at a metropolitan public hospital in Melbourne where the majority of general medicine patients in the emergency department (ED) are not seen by a consultant physician until they are transferred to the ward. AIMS: To assess the impact of general medicine consultant-led ward rounds (CWRs) in the ED on patient length of stay (LOS). METHODS: One-month audit was conducted of all patients admitted to general medicine and awaiting transfer to ward from ED at a metropolitan public hospital in Melbourne. A general medicine CWR was then implemented in the ED, followed by another 1-month audit, with the primary outcome being LOS and the secondary outcome being 30-day readmission rate. Additionally, admitting medical registrars were invited to complete a survey before and after the implementation of CWRs to assess satisfaction rate. RESULTS: Data from electronic medical records were analysed for 162 patients (90 preimplementation group and 72 postimplementation group). The median LOS was 6 days in the preimplementation group and 4 days in the postimplementation group (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rates. Surveys showed admitting medical registrars reported a reduced level of stress and fewer barriers to seeking consultant input following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A CWR in the ED has led to decreased LOS for general medicine patients and improved satisfaction among junior medical staff.