Proceedings of the Canadian Frailty Network Workshop: Identifying Biomarkers of Frailty to Support Frailty Risk Assessment, Diagnosis and Prognosis. Toronto, January 15, 2018.

The Canadian Frailty Network (CFN), a pan-Canadian not-for-profit organization funded by the Government of Canada through the Networks of Centres of Excellence Program, is dedicated to improving the care of older Canadians living with frailty. The CFN has partnered with the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) to measure potential frailty biomarkers in biological samples (whole blood, plasma, urine) collected in over 30,000 CLSA participants. CFN hosted a workshop in Toronto on January 15 2018, bringing together experts in the field of biomarkers, aging and frailty. The overall objectives of the workshop were to start building a consensus on potential frailty biomarker domains and identify specific frailty biomarkers to be measured in the CLSA biological samples. The workshop was structured with presentations in the morning to frame the discussions for the afternoon session, which was organized as a free-flowing discussion to benefit from the expertise of the participants. Participants and speakers were from Canada, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States. Herein we provide pertinent background information, a summary of all the presentations with key figures and tables, and the distillation of the discussions. In addition, moving forward, the principles CFN will use to approach frailty biomarker research and development are outlined. Findings from the workshop are helping CFN and CLSA plan and conduct the analysis of biomarkers in the CLSA samples and which will inform a follow-up data access competition.

Testing for BNP and NT-proBNP in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate BNP and NT-proBNP to: (a) identify determinants, (b) establish their diagnostic performance in heart failure (HF) patients, (c) determine their predictive ability with respect to mortality and other cardiac endpoints, and (d) determine their value in monitoring HF treatment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and AMED from 1989 to February 2005 were searched for primary studies. REVIEW METHODS: Standard systematic review methodology, including meta-analysis, was employed. All study designs were included. Eligibility criteria included English-only studies and restricted the number of test methods to maximize generalizability. Outcomes for prognosis were limited to mortality and specific cardiac events. Further specific criteria were developed for each research question. RESULTS: Determinants: There were 103 determinants identified including age, gender, disease, treatment, as well as biochemical and physiological measures. Few studies reported independent associations and of those that did age, female gender and creatinine levels were positively associated with BNP and NT-proBNP. DIAGNOSIS: Pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 94 and 66 percent for BNP and 92 and 65 percent for NT-proBNP; there was minimal difference among settings (emergency, specialized clinics, and primary care). B-type natriuretic peptides also added independent diagnostic information above traditional measures for HF. PROGNOSIS: Both BNP and NT-proBNP were found to be independent predictors of mortality and other cardiac composite endpoints in patients with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) (risk estimate range = 1.10 to 5.40), diagnosed CAD (risk estimate range = 1.50 to 3.00), and diagnosed HF patients (risk estimate range = 2.11 to 9.35). With respect to screening, the AUC values (range = 0.57 to 0.88) suggested poor performance. Monitoring Treatment: Studies showed therapy reduced BNP and NT-proBNP, however, relationship to outcome was limited and not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Determinants: The importance of the identified determinants for clinical use is not clear. DIAGNOSIS: In all settings both BNP and NT-proBNP show good diagnostic properties as a rule out test for HF. PROGNOSIS: BNP and NT-proBNP are consistent independent predictors of mortality and other cardiac composite endpoints for populations with risk of CAD, diagnosed CAD, and diagnosed HF. There is insufficient evidence to determine the value of B-type natriuretic peptides for screening of HF. Monitoring Treatment: There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that BNP and NT-proBNP levels show change in response to therapies to manage stable chronic HF patients.

Carbamylated hemoglobin and carbamylated plasma protein in hemodialyzed patients.

The carbamylation reaction in vivo involves the nonenzymatic, covalent attachment of isocyanic acid, the spontaneous dissociation product of urea, to proteins. Carbamylated proteins have been proposed as markers of uremia and indicators of uremic control. However, the utility of measuring carbamylated proteins has not been investigated adequately. Therefore, this study was done to determine the relationship between the carbamylation of long-lived protein (hemoglobin) with that of short-lived proteins (plasma proteins) in hemodialyzed patients. Significantly higher carbamylated hemoglobin (CHb; 157 +/- 40 microg valine hydantoin/g Hb) and carbamylated protein (CTP; 0.117 +/- 0.011 absorbance/mg protein) concentrations were found in hemodialyzed patients (N = 13) as compared to normal individuals (N = 9, 53 +/- 20 microg valine hydantoin/g Hb and 0.08 +/- 0.01 absorbance/mg protein, respectively). A high correlation was found between CHb and CTP concentrations (r = 0.87, P < 0.0001), demonstrating a strong relationship between these two different half-lived proteins. A six-month longitudinal study of seven hemodialyzed patients showed that the between subject correlations were significant for CHb versus CTP as well as CHb versus pre-dialysis urea. Correlations were not significant for CTP versus pre-dialysis urea or Kt/V, nor CHb versus Kt/V. Carbamylated hemoglobin fluctuated the most over this time period (30.1% +/- 20.2%), pre-dialysis urea and CTP varied less (18.3% +/- 13.4% and 14.9% +/- 7.5%, respectively), and Kt/V varied the least (6.3% +/- 3.3%). Within subject correlations were not significant between any two tests. It is unclear whether the lack of correlations found is real or a function of the small sample size. However, these data do show that CHb and CTP are positively associated and reflect the degree of urea exposure in the blood, but their usefulness for patients on maintenance hemodialysis is not clear.

Regulation of carnosine metabolism: the subcellular localization of carnosinase in liver.

We studied the subcellular localization of carnosinase (EC 3.4.13.3) in rat liver. The liver homogenate was fractionated by differential centrifugation into a nuclear (N), a mitochondrial (M), a lysosomal (L), a microsomal (P) and a soluble (S) fraction. The purity of different subcellular fractions was established by using different markers. The carnosinase activity in different fractions was measured by fluorometric determination of L-histidine produced using carnosine as a substrate. The intracellular distribution of carnosinase was very similar to that of lactate dehydrogenase with the highest relative specific activity of enzyme being observed in the soluble fraction. These results indicate that carnosinase enzyme is primarily located in the soluble (cytoplasmic) fraction of rat liver.