Impaired Visual Function in Posterior Vitreous Detachment Assessed With the Active-Learning Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function Test.

Introduction: To investigate whether there is visual function impairment in patients with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) using the active-learning quantitative contrast sensitivity function test. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, contrast sensitivity was measured in eyes with PVD and eyes without PVD using the quantitative contrast sensitivity function algorithm on the Adaptive Sensory Technology platform. Outcomes included the area under the log contrast sensitivity function curve, contrast acuity, and contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Snellen visual acuity (VA) was also measured. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the presence of PVD and visual function, controlling for age and lens status. Results: The cohort comprised 232 healthy eyes of 205 participants; of these, 80 eyes of 69 patients had PVD. There was no significant association between VA and PVD presence. However, PVD was significantly associated with decreased contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1.5 cpd (ß, -0.058; P = .003) and 3 cpd (ß, -0.067; P = .004). Contrast sensitivity thresholds at lower (1 cpd) or higher (6, 12, 18 cpd) spatial frequencies did not significantly correlate with PVD presence. Even in the subgroup of symptomatic PVD eyes, VA was not significantly decreased, while quantitative contrast sensitivity function outcomes showed visual function deficits at low spatial frequencies (1.5 cpd and 3 cpd). Conclusions: Contrast sensitivity measured with the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test showed visual function deficits in eyes with PVD that would have been missed with VA testing alone. Incorporating this test in the retina clinic might offer a more comprehensive functional assessment of eyes with PVD, serving as an adjunct outcome metric in clinical decision-making.

Contrast Sensitivity Better Reflects Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vascular Metrics Among Healthy Eyes Compared to Visual Acuity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) and visual function in healthy eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven eyes of 45 patients were evaluated with visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and WF SS-OCTA (3 × 3, 6 × 6, and 12 × 12 mm images) on the same day. Mixed-effects multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity metrics, including CS between 6 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd) and area under the logarithm CS function, were significantly associated with vessel density (VD) and vessel skeletonized density (VSD), whereas VA was not. The largest effect size was between CS at 18 cpd and VD (ß = 0.41, P = 0.007) and VSD (ß = 0.42, P = 0.006) on 12 × 12 mm images. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced VSD and VD on WF SSOCTA was significantly associated with decreased CS, whereas VA was not. These results suggest CS could serve as a screening tool for early stage retinal and neurologic disorders. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:494-502.].

Decreased Macular Choriocapillaris Perfusion Correlates with Contrast Sensitivity Function in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationships between contrast sensitivity (CS), choriocapillaris perfusion, and other structural OCT biomarkers in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred AMD eyes (22 early, 52 intermediate, and 26 late) from 74 patients and 45 control eyes from 37 age-similar subjects. METHODS: All participants had visual acuity (VA) assessment, quantitative CS function (qCSF) testing, macular OCT, and 6 × 6-mm swept-source OCT angiography scans on the same day. OCT volumes were analyzed for subretinal drusenoid deposits and hyporeflective drusen cores, and to measure thickness of the outer nuclear layer. OCT angiography scans were utilized to calculate drusen volume and inner choroid flow deficit percentage (IC-FD%), and to measure the area of choroidal hypertransmission defects (HTDs). Inner choroid flow deficit percentage was measured from a 16-µm thick choriocapillaris slab after compensation and binarization with Phansalkar's method. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the associations between functional and structural variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To explore the associations between qCSF-measured CS, IC-FD%, and various AMD imaging biomarkers. RESULTS: Age-related macular degeneration exhibited significantly reduced qCSF metrics eyes across all stages compared with controls. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between various imaging biomarkers, reduced qCSF metrics, and VA in both groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that higher IC-FD% in the central 5 mm was significantly associated with decreases in all qCSF metrics in AMD eyes (ß = -0.74 to -0.25, all P < 0.05), but not with VA (P > 0.05). Outer nuclear layer thickness in the central 3 mm correlated with both VA (ß = 2.85, P < 0.001) and several qCSF metrics (ß = 0.01-0.90, all P < 0.05), especially in AMD eyes. Further, larger HTD areas were associated with decreased VA (ß = -0.89, P < 0.001) and reduced CS at low-intermediate frequencies across AMD stages (ß = -0.30 to -0.29, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant association between IC-FD% in the central 5 mm and qCSF-measured CS reinforces the hypothesis that decreased macular choriocapillaris perfusion contributes to visual function changes in AMD, which are more pronounced in CS than in VA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function and the Effect of Aging in Healthy Adult Eyes: A Normative Database.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish normative quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) values in healthy adult eyes and investigate the effect of age on qCSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy eyes underwent qCSF testing (adaptive sensory technology) and Snellen's visual acuity (VA). Descriptive statistics and mixed-effects multivariable linear regressions were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 334 eyes (290 patients) with median age 61 years (range 21 to 88) had qCSF values as follows: area under the log contrast sensitivity function curve: 1.18; contrast acuity: 1.32; contrast sensitivity (CS) at 1 cycle per degree (cpd): 1.32; CS at 1.5 cpd: 1.37; CS at 3 cpd: 1.38; CS at 6 cpd: 1.20; CS at 12 cpd: 0.69; CS at 18 cpd: 0.22. Linear reductions in qCSF values per decade of age ranged from -0.02 to -0.07 vs 0.01 for visual acuity (VA). Age had a greater effect on the majority of qCSF values than VA (beta standardized regression coefficient ranged from -0.309 to -0.141 for qCSF values vs 0.177 for VA). CONCLUSIONS: We herein establish a normative database for qCSF and quantify the effect of age on qCSF values, adding evidence towards the validation of qCSF as a clinical endpoint. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:212-219.].

Test-retest repeatability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test: towards the validation of a new clinical endpoint.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate test-retest reliability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test (qCSF) in the retina clinic. METHODS: A total of 121 right eyes of 121 patients were tested and consecutively re-tested with qCSF in the retina clinic. Outcomes included area under the logarithm of contrast sensitivity function curve (AULCSF), contrast acuity, and contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1-18 cycles per degree (cpd). Test-retest means were compared with paired t-test, variability was compared with the Brown-Forsythe test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots evaluated reliability and agreement. RESULTS: Mean test-retest differences for all qCSF metrics ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 log units without statistically significant differences in variability. Standard deviations ranged from 0.08 to 0.14. Coefficients of repeatability ranged from 0.16 to 0.27 log units. ICC > 0.9 for all metrics except 1cpd (ICC = 0.84, all p < 0.001); AULCSF ICC = 0.971. CONCLUSION: qCSF-measured contrast sensitivity shows great test-retest repeatability and agreement in the retina clinic.

Towards the validation of quantitative contrast sensitivity as a clinical endpoint: correlations with vision-related quality of life in bilateral AMD.

AIM: To investigate if active learning of contrast sensitivity (CS) in bilateral age-related macular degeneration (AMD) correlates better than visual acuity (VA) with vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) using factor analysis-calibrated National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25). METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional observational study in 93 patients (186 eyes) with bilateral AMD. CS was measured in one eye at a time with the quantitative CS function (qCSF) method (Adaptive Sensory Technology). Same-day VRQoL was assessed with factor analysis-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 visual function and socioemotional scales. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analyses evaluated the associations of the qCSF outcomes and VA with the NEI VFQ-25 scales. A subgroup analysis on patients with AMD with VA more than 20/25 in both eyes was performed. RESULTS: Compared with VA, CS outcomes were associated with larger effect on both visual function scale (standardised beta coefficients (ß*) for area under the logarithm of CSF (AULCSF) curve and CS thresholds at 1.5, 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd): ß*=0.50, 0.48, 0.52, 0.46, all p<0.001, respectively, vs ß*=-0.45 for VA, all p<0.001) and socioemotional scale (ß* for AULCSF and CS threshold at 6 cpd: ß*=0.44, 0.44 vs ß*=-0.42 for VA, all p<0.001). In patients with AMD with VA more than 20/25 in both eyes (N=20), both VFQ-25 scales and all CS outcomes were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: qCSF-measured CS strongly correlates with patient-reported VRQoL in bilateral AMD, even stronger than VA does. This study further validates qCSF-measured CS as a promising functional endpoint for future clinical trials in AMD.

Association Between Contrast Sensitivity and Central Subfield Thickness in Center-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: To evaluate the association between contrast sensitivity (CS) and central subfield thickness (CST) in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This prospectively recruited, cross-sectional study included eyes with DME evaluated from November 2018 to March 2021. CST was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography on the same day as CS testing. Only eyes with center-involving DME (CST >305 µm for women; >320 µm for men) were included. CS was evaluated using the quantitative CS function (qCSF) test. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and the following qCSF metrics: area under the log CS function, contrast acuity (CA), and CS thresholds at 1 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Pearson correlation and mixed-effects regression analyses were performed. Results: The cohort included 52 eyes of 43 patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed a stronger association between CST and CS thresholds at 6 cpd (r = -0.422, P = 0.002) than CST and VA (r = 0.293, P = 0.035). Mixed-effects univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed significant associations between CST and CA (ß = -0.001, P = .030), CS at 6 cpd (ß = -0.002, P = .008), and CS at 12 cpd (ß = -0.001, P = .049) but no significant associations between CST and VA. Among the visual function metrics, the effect size of CST was largest on CS at 6 cpd (ßStandardized = -0.37, P = .008). Conclusions: In patients with DME, CS may be more strongly associated with CST than VA. Including CS as an adjunct visual function outcome measure in eyes with DME may prove clinically valuable.

Structure-function association between contrast sensitivity and retinal thickness (total, regional, and individual retinal layer) in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

PURPOSE: To investigate structure-function associations between retinal thickness, visual acuity (VA), and contrast sensitivity (CS), using the quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional observational study. Patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic ERM were included. Patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging (SD-OCT) (SPECTRALIS® Heidelberg), and CS testing using the qCSF method. Outcomes included area under the log CSF (AULCSF), contrast acuity (CA), and CS thresholds at 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). RESULTS: A total of 102 eyes of 79 patients were included. Comparing standardized regression coefficients, retinal thickness in most ETDRS sectors was associated with larger reductions in AULCSF, CA, and CS thresholds at 3 and 6 cpd than those in logMAR VA. These differences in effect on VA and CS metrics were more pronounced in the central subfield and inner ETDRS sectors. Among the retinal layers, increased INL thickness had the most detrimental effect on visual function, being significantly associated with reductions in logMAR VA, AULCSF, CA, and CS thresholds at 3 and 6 cpd (all p < .01), as well as at 1.5 and 12 cpd (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness seems to be associated with larger reductions in contrast sensitivity than VA in patients with ERM. Measured with the qCSF method, contrast sensitivity may serve as a valuable adjunct visual function metric for patients with ERM.