RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional-order calculus (FROC)-specific parameters with prognostic indicators and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutation status in rectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients with rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Histogram measurements of ADC, diffusion coefficient (D), intravoxel diffusion heterogeneity (ß), and a microstructural quantity (µ) were estimated for the whole-tumor volume. The relationships between histogram measurements and prognostic indicators were evaluated. The efficacy of histogram measurements, both conducted singly and in conjunction, for evaluating different KRAS mutation statuses was also assessed. The performance of mean and median histogram measurements in evaluating various KRAS mutation statuses was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The histogram measurements of ADC, D, ß, and µ differed significantly between well-moderately differentiated groups and poorly differentiated groups, T1-2 and T3-4 subgroups, lymph node metastasis (LNM)-negative and LNM-positive subgroups, extranodal extension (ENE)-negative and ENE-positive subgroups, tumor deposit (TD)-negative and TD-positive subgroups, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)-negative and LVI-positive subgroups. The combination of Dmean, ßmean, and µmean achieved the highest performance [The area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.904] in evaluating the KRAS mutation status. CONCLUSION: When assessing parameters from the FROC model as potential biomarkers through histograms, they surpass traditional ADC values in distinguishing prognostic indicators and determining KRAS mutation status in rectal cancer.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study explored models of monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched exponential (SEM), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) as diagnostic tools for assessing pathological prognostic factors in patients with resectable rectal cancer (RRC). METHODS: RRC patients who underwent radical surgery were included. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusion (MD) from the DKI model, the distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and α from the SEM model, D, ß and u from the FROC model, and D, α and ß from the CTRW model were assessed. RESULTS: There were a total of 181 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of CTRW-α for predicting histology type was significantly higher than that of FROC-u (0.780 vs. 0.671, p = 0.043). The AUC of CTRW-α for predicting pT stage was significantly higher than that of FROC-u and ADC (0.786 vs.0.683, p = 0.043; 0.786 vs. 0.682, p = 0.030), the difference in predictive efficacy of FROC-u between ADC and MK was not statistically significant [0.683 vs. 0.682, p = 0.981; 0.683 vs. 0.703, p = 0.720]; the difference between the predictive efficacy of MK and ADC was not statistically significant (p = 0.696). The AUC of CTRW (α + ß) (0.781) was significantly higher than that of FROC-u (0.781 vs. 0.625, p = 0.003) in predicting pN stage but not significantly different from that of MK (p = 0.108). CONCLUSION: The CTRW and DKI models may serve as imaging biomarkers to predict pathological prognostic factors in RRC patients before surgery.