Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Cytopathology ; 34(5): 489-492, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357838

RESUMEN

Cytomorphology along with positive AE1/AE3 staining and Brachyury staining support the dignosis of metastatic dedifferentiated chordoma.


Asunto(s)
Cordoma , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Cordoma/diagnóstico , Cordoma/patología , Inmunohistoquímica , Coloración y Etiquetado
2.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 45(2): 99-102, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716245

RESUMEN

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphoma characterized by a cluster of differentiation-30 positivity. Subtypes are characterized by positive or negative anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression. ALCLs account for about 10% to 15% of all pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphomas and more than 90% of the cases are ALK-positive. We report a rare case of pediatric systemic ALK-negative ALCL with an atypical presentation as a painful breast mass. Despite the general benign features of most pediatric breast masses, it is important to consider malignant systemic diagnoses like the one reported here.


Asunto(s)
Mama , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes , Linfoma de Células T Periférico , Linfoma de Células T , Niño , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/metabolismo , Mama/patología
3.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 39: 100918, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024404

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression is a hallmark of ovarian serous carcinoma and considered to be diagnostic marker of these tumors, differentiating them from uterine serous carcinoma (USC), historically thought to rarely express WT1. However, more recent data indicates a significant percentage of USC may express WT1. The clinical implications of WT1 positivity in USC remain unclear. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with USC was conducted from 2000 to 2019. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone comprehensive surgical staging/tumor debulking with archival tissue available for WT1 assessment via immunohistochemistry (IHC). Chemosensitive patients were defined as those recurring >6 months from last platinum-based chemotherapy. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: WT1 status was evaluated in 61 patients with USC. 13 (21.3%) were positive for WT1 by IHC. Stage distribution included 32% stage I, 5% stage II, 25% stage III and 38% stage IV. There was no difference in the stage (p = 0.158), race (p = 0.227) or distribution of recurrence sites (p = 0.581) between WT1 positive and WT1 negative tumors. The majority of patients were chemosensitive (63%). Chemosensitivity was significantly improved in WT1 positive (92.3%) vs. WT1 negative tumors (55.8%) (p = 0.016). We observed a trend towards improved PFS among WT1 positive tumors (21 vs. 16-months, respectively) (p = 0.544). On MVA, stage (p < 0.001) and chemosensitivity (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: WT1 positivity is observed in over 20% of USC. WT1 expression is associated with improved chemosensitivity which may contribute to improvements in PFS.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA