Predictors of long-term survival after hip fractures?-5-year results of a prospective study in Germany.

The incidence of hip fractures is increasing due to demographic transition. Data on long-term survival and influencing factors are sparse. Our prospective observational study with 395 patients shows a survival of 38% after 5 years. Significant risk factors were male gender, higher age, lower Barthel Index, lower Charlson Comorbidity Score, lower Mini-Mental State Examination, and delirium during hospitalization. PURPOSE: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing due to demographic transition. Until now, they are associated with poor results and high mortality rates. Data on long-term survival and influencing factors are sparse. Therefore, a prospective observational study was conducted. METHODS: Patients ≥ 60 years with hip fracture were included in this prospective study between 2009 and 2011. Demographic parameters, as well as ASA Score, pre-fracture Barthel Index and EQ-5D, Mini-Mental State Examination, Charlson Comorbidity Score, fracture type, type of surgical treatment, place of discharge, and arising complications were registered. Outcome parameter was survival during a 5-year follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 539 patients attended to our emergency room during the period of recruitment. The recruitment rate was 75%. A total of 402 patients were included; 7 were lost to follow-up, and 152 (38%) survived the study period. The mortality was more than 25% in the first year after fracture. Subsequently, it was between 7 and 9% per year. In the multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for dying were male gender (p = 0.002), higher age (p < 0.001), lower Charlson Comorbidity Score (p = 0.033), lower Barthel Index (p = 0.024), lower Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.002), and occurrence of delirium during hospitalization (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm poor results of geriatric patients after hip fracture. While early results might be influenced by optimal fracture care, long-term results seem to be determined by not changeable patient factors. Nevertheless, more than one third of surviving patients after 5 years justify the elaborate treatment algorithms for these fragile patients.

Variation in precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer among high-risk groups.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance programs are currently offered to high-risk individuals aiming to detect precursor lesions or PDAC at an early stage. We assessed differences in frequency and behavior of precursor lesions and PDAC between two high-risk groups. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Individuals with a p16-Leiden germline mutation (N = 116; median age 54 years) and individuals from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families (N = 125; median age 47 years) were offered annual surveillance by MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with or without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for a median surveillance period of 34 months (0-127 months) or 36 months (0-110 months), respectively. Detailed information was collected on pancreatic cystic lesions detected on MRCP and precursor lesions in surgical specimens of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery. RESULTS: Cystic lesions were more common in the FPC cohort (42% vs. 16% in p16-Leiden cohort), whereas PDAC was more common in the p16-Leiden cohort (7% vs. 0.8% in FPC cohort). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) was a common finding in surgical specimens of FPC-individuals, and was only found in two patients of the p16-Leiden cohort. In the p16-Leiden cohort, a substantial proportion of cystic lesions showed growth or malignant transformation during follow-up, whereas in FPC individuals most cystic lesions remain stable. CONCLUSION: In p16-Leiden mutation carriers, cystic lesions have a higher malignant potential than in FPC-individuals. On the basis of these findings, a more intensive surveillance program may be considered in this high-risk group.