Prioritising physical and psychological symptoms: what are the barriers and facilitators to the discussion of anxiety in the primary care consultation?

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is under-recorded and under-treated in the UK and is under-represented in research compared with depression. Detecting anxiety can be difficult because of co-existing conditions. GPs can be reluctant to medicalise anxiety symptoms and patients can be reluctant to disclose them, for a variety of reasons. This research addresses the gap in evidence of real-life consultations of patients with anxiety and explores how physical and psychological symptoms are discussed and prioritised by patients and GPs in primary care consultations. METHODS: A mixed methods study using a baseline questionnaire, video-recorded primary care consultations and interview data with patients and GPs. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 score ≥ 10) completed a questionnaire, had their consultation video-recorded and took part in a semi-structured interview. Four GPs were interviewed. The main themes that emerged from GP and patients accounts as barriers and facilitators to discussing anxiety mostly mirrored each other. The GP/patient relationship and continuity of care was the main facilitator for the discussion of anxiety in the consultation. The main barriers were: attribution of or unacknowledged symptoms; co-morbidities; and time constraints. GPs overcame these barriers by making repeat appointments and employing prioritising techniques; patients by choosing an empathetic GP. CONCLUSIONS: The findings add to the evidence base concerning the management of anxiety in primary care. The findings suggest that the discussion around anxiety is a process negotiated between the patient and the GP influenced by a range of barriers and facilitators. Co-existing depression and health anxieties can mask anxiety symptoms in patients. Good practice techniques such as bringing back patients for appointments to foster continuity of care and understanding can help disclosure and detection of anxiety symptoms. Future research could investigate this longitudinally and should include a wider range of GPs practices and GPs.

Correction to: The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0365-6.].

The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

BACKGROUND: Job loss, austerity measures, financial difficulties and house repossession contribute to the risk of self-harm and suicide during recessions. Navigating the benefits system and accessing sources of welfare and debt advice is a difficult experience for vulnerable people, further contributing to their distress. Whilst there is some evidence that advice-type interventions can lead to financial gain, there is mixed evidence for their effectiveness in improving mental health in those experiencing financial difficulties. There have been no interventions targeting those who have self-harmed due to economic hardship. METHODS: Our aim was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychosocial intervention (the 'HOPE' service) for people presenting to hospital emergency departments (ED) following self-harm or in acute distress because of financial, employment or welfare (benefit) difficulties. Nineteen people consented to random allocation to the intervention or control arm on a 2:1 basis. Participants randomised to the intervention arm (n = 13) received up to six sessions of 1:1 support provided by community support staff trained in Motivational Interviewing (MI). Control participants (n = 6) received a one-off session signposting them to relevant support organisations. Fourteen participants were followed up after 3 months. Participants and mental health workers took part in qualitative interviews. The acceptability of outcome measures including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, repeat self-harm, EQ5D-5 L and questions about debt, employment and welfare benefits were explored. RESULTS: Interviews indicated the main benefits of the service as the resolution of specific financial problems and receiving support when participants were feeling most vulnerable. Randomisation was acceptable to most participants although not always fully understood and control participants could be disappointed. Recruitment was slow (1-2 per month). The outcome measures were acceptable and appeared sensitive to change. DISCUSSION: The HOPE intervention is feasible and acceptable. There was evidence of need and it is a relatively inexpensive intervention. Refining aspects of the intervention would be straightforward. A full-scale RCT would be feasible, if broadened eligibility criteria led to increased recruitment and improvements were made to staff training and support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN58531248.

HOPE: Help fOr People with money, employment, benefit or housing problems: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-harm and suicide increase in times of economic recession. Factors including job loss, austerity measures, financial difficulties and house repossession contribute to the risk. Vulnerable individuals commonly experience difficulties in navigating the benefits system and in accessing the available sources of welfare and debt advice, and this contributes to their distress. Our aim is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychosocial intervention (the "HOPE" service) for people presenting to hospital emergency departments (ED) following self-harm or in acute distress because of financial, employment, or welfare (benefit) difficulties. METHOD: A pilot study including randomisation will be employed to determine whether it is possible to undertake a full-scale trial. Twenty people presenting to the ED who have self-harmed, have suicidal thoughts and depression and/or are in crisis and where financial, employment or benefit problems are cited as contributory factors will be asked to consent to random allocation to the intervention or control arm on a 2:1 basis. People who require secondary mental health follow-up will be excluded. Those randomised to the intervention arm will receive up to six sessions with a mental health worker who will provide practical help with financial and other problems. The mental health worker will use the motivational interviewing method in their interactions with participants. Control participants will receive one session signposting them to existing relevant support organisations. Participants will be followed up after 3 months. Participants and the mental health workers will take part in qualitative interviews to enable refinement of the intervention. The acceptability of outcome measures including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, repeat self-harm, EQ5D-5L and questions about debt, employment and welfare benefits will be explored. DISCUSSION: This study will assess whether a full-scale randomised trial of this novel intervention to prevent self-harm among those distressed because of financial difficulties is feasible, including the acceptability of randomisation, potential rate of recruitment and the acceptability of outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN58531248.

Seeking help in times of economic hardship: access, experiences of services and unmet need.

BACKGROUND: Economic recessions are often accompanied by increased levels of psychological distress and suicidal behaviour in affected populations. Little is known about the experiences of people seeking help for employment, financial and benefit-related difficulties during recessions. We investigated the experiences of people struggling financially in the aftermath of the Great Recession (2008-9) - including some who had self-harmed - and of the frontline support staff providing assistance. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with three groups of people in two cities: i) people who had self-harmed due to employment, financial or benefit concerns (n = 19) ('self-harm'); ii) people who were struggling financially drawn from the community (n = 22), including one focus group) ('community'); iii) and frontline staff from voluntary and statutory sector organisations (e.g., Job Centres, Debt Advice and counselling agencies) providing support services to the groups (n = 25, including 2 focus groups) ('service providers'). Data were analysed using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Service provision was described by people as confusing and difficult to access. The community sample reported considerably more knowledge and access to debt advice than the participants who had self-harmed - although both groups sought similar types of help. The self-harm group exhibited greater expectation that they should be self-reliant and also reported lower levels of informal networks and support from friends and relatives. They had also experienced more difficult circumstances such as benefit sanctions, and most had pre-existing mental health problems. Both self-harm and community groups indicated that practical help for debt and benefit issues would be the most useful - a view supported by service providers - and would have particularly helped those who self-harmed. CONCLUSION: Interventions to identify those in need and aid them to access practical, reliable and free advice from support agencies could help mitigate the impact on mental health of benefit, debt and employment difficulties for vulnerable sections of society.

Understanding vulnerability to self-harm in times of economic hardship and austerity: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Self-harm and suicide increase in times of economic recession, but little is known about why people self-harm when in financial difficulty, and in what circumstances self-harm occurs. This study aimed to understand events and experiences leading to the episode of self-harm and to identify opportunities for prevention or mitigation of distress. SETTING: Participants' homes or university rooms. PARTICIPANTS: 19 people who had attended hospital following self-harm in two UK cities and who specifically cited job loss, economic hardship or the impact of austerity measures as a causal or contributory factor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Semistructured, in-depth interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed cross-sectionally and as case studies. RESULTS: Study participants described experiences of severe economic hardship; being unable to find employment or losing jobs, debt, housing problems and benefit sanctions. In many cases problems accumulated and felt unresolvable. For others an event, such as a call from a debt collector or benefit change triggered the self-harm. Participants also reported other current or past difficulties, including abuse, neglect, bullying, domestic violence, mental health problems, relationship difficulties, bereavements and low self-esteem. These contributed to their sense of despair and worthlessness and increased their vulnerability to self-harm. Participants struggled to gain the practical help they felt they needed for their economic difficulties or therapeutic support that might have helped with their other co-existing or historically damaging experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Economic hardships resulting from the recession and austerity measures accumulated or acted as a 'final straw' to trigger self-harm, often in the context of co-existing or historically damaging life-experiences. Interventions to mitigate these effects should include providing practical advice about economic issues before difficulties become insurmountable and providing appropriate psychosocial support for vulnerable individuals.

Can early infection explain the sibling effect in adult atopy?

Atopy is strongly and inversely related to family size, a pattern which is plausibly assumed to reflect a protective effect of early infection. The current study tested this hypothesis by case-referent analysis of an adult cohort in the UK. The study established that atopy, defined by prick tests to common aeroallergens, was less common among those from larger families after adjustment for potentially confounding factors. In particular, a higher number of brothers appeared to offer protection. The current authors attempted to explain this distribution by examining contemporary family-doctor records of early childhood infections; and by a number of other indirect indices of early-life "hygiene". The sibling effect was unexplained by evidence of infection with either hepatitis A or Helicobacter pylori, or by counts of infections or antibiotic prescriptions in early life. There was a significant and independent negative association between the number of gastrointestinal infections before the age of 5 yrs and the odds of atopy. Dog ownership and home moving in early life also displayed potentially protective associations. Although the current study replicates the finding that atopy is inversely associated with family size this could not be explained by documentary or serological evidence of early infection. The findings support the suggestion that the "sibling effect" in atopy may not simply reflect protection by early infection.

Do primary afferent cell numbers change in relation to increasing weight and surface area in adult rats?

Adult mammalian primary afferent neurogenesis implies considerably more plasticity for the adult nervous system than is presently envisioned. One hypothesis is that such neurogenesis does not occur, because no tritiated-thymidine-labeled or mitosing neurons are observed in adults, and no increase in cells can be found in young as compared to old adults. The other hypothesis is that adult primary afferent neurogenesis does occur, but that it has not been observed because it is correlated with changes in the size of the animals. This has not been tested, and because of the implications of adult neurogenesis, it is important to see whether dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell numbers increase with animal size. This is particularly pertinent because of recent advances in the technology for counting neurons and improved methods for resolving the cells in question. The present results indicate that DRG cell numbers are approximately the same in animals whose sizes are different by a factor of approximately 5. Thus our data are consistent with the hypothesis that numbers of adult DRG cells are stable, and we cannot demonstrate a change in relation to age or body size in our animals. Therefore, we do not find evidence of adult neurogenesis in our animals.

The role of Ia molecules in the activation of T lymphocytes. II. Ia-restricted recognition of allo K/D antigens is required for class I MHC-stimulated mixed lymphocyte responses.

The role of Ia molecules in the T cell proliferative response to class I (H2K/D) MHC alloantigens was examined. Proliferation in response to allo-K/D antigenic stimulation, but not to allo-Ia, was markedly inhibited by the addition of monoclonal anti-responder Ia antibodies to cultures in the absence of C. This anti-Ia blocking was observed in responses against both allelic and mutant class I antigens. Partial blocking was observed by using an anti-I-A or anti-I-E monoclonal antibody alone, whereas marked inhibition was seen with these two reagents together when the proliferating cells derived from a responder strain expressing both IA and IE gene products. Syngeneic Ia molecules appear to function as restriction elements, because they are required even in the presence of a source of exogenous second signal, phorbol myristic acetate or IL 1. The K/D-specific response required a responding cell that bears both Lyt-1 and -2 antigens, whereas responses generated to alloantigenic differences, including the I region, require only an Ly-1+ cell. The implications of these data with respect to the repertoire of the alloreactive proliferating T cell and the expression of the Lyt-2 antigen by such cells are discussed.

Effect of carcinogens and analogs on interferon induction.

Pretreatment of mouse embryo fibroblasts with several chemicals, including 7,12-dimethylbenz-(a)-anthracene, 2-aminofluorene, aflatoxin B1, benzo-(a)-pyrene, styrene oxide, and the No. 4 fraction of tobacco smoke condensate, resulted in severely reduced production of interferon when the cells were challenged with Newcastle disease virus. All of the above chemicals are proven or strongly suggested carcinogens. When the analogs methyl methanesulfonate, a potent carcinogen, and ethyl methanesulfonate, a weak carcinogen, were applied to cells, interferon induction was only inhibited by the methyl methanesulfonate. Therefore, carcinogens may directly inhibit the induction of interferon by Newcastle disease virus.

Rod-shaped organism in the liver of a patient with Whipple's disease.

Histological review of a liver biopsy from a patient with known Whipple's disease revealed a prominence of Kupffer cells containing PAS-positive granules. Electron microscopy revealed rod-shaped organisms in the Kupffer cells but the presence of these structures were not associated with overt liver injury. This is thought to be the first reported demonstration of these bacillary bodies in this location.