RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is performed to improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Few reports have documented QOL following TPIAT, with none using the pancreatitis-specific Pancreatitis Quality of Life Instrument (PANQOLI). We surveyed patients at our center who underwent TPIAT to document postoperative QOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected survey data from 18 adult patients who underwent TPIAT at our medical center from 2012 to 2020. Patients were asked questions assessing QOL following TPIAT and completed the Short-Form Health Survey and PANQOLI instruments. RESULTS: Forty-three patients who underwent TPIAT were mailed surveys, and 18 were returned. The mean age was 45 years, and 67% of respondents were female. Almost half (44%) had hereditary pancreatitis. Sixty-seven percent believed that their overall QOL had improved after surgery. The mean postoperative Short-Form Health Survey physical score was 38.9 and mean mental score was 44. The mean PANQOLI score was 66 (physical function 20, role function 16, emotional function 14, self-worth 15). Following surgery, 33% were using opiate medications and 67% were using antihyperglycemic medications. CONCLUSIONS: TPIAT resulted in improved self-reported QOL in most patients, although postoperative physical and mental QOL are less compared to the average healthy United States adult.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Pancreatectomía , Pancreatitis Crónica , Calidad de Vida , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pancreatitis Crónica/cirugía , Pancreatitis Crónica/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As the American population ages, the number of geriatric adults requiring emergency general surgery (EGS) care is increasing. EGS regionalization could significantly affect the pattern of care for rural older adults. The aim of this study was to determine the current pattern of care for geriatric EGS patients at our rural academic center, with a focus on transfer status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥65 undergoing EGS procedures within 48 h of admission from 2014 to 2019 at our rural academic medical center. We collected demographic, admission, operative, and outcomes data. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and nonhome discharge. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Over the 5-y study period, 674 patients underwent EGS procedures, with 407 (60%) transferred to our facility. Transfer patients (TPs) had higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores (P < 0.001), higher rates of open abdomen (13% versus 5.6%, P = 0.001), and multiple operations (24 versus 11%, P < 0.001) than direct admit patients. However, after adjustment there was no difference in mortality (OR 1.64; 95% CI, 0.82-3.38) or nonhome discharge (OR 1.49; 95% CI, 0.95-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, the majority of rural geriatric EGS patients were transferred from another hospital for care. These patients had higher medical and operative complexity than patients presenting directly to our facility for care. After adjustment, transfer status was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality or nonhome discharge. These patients were appropriately transferred given their level of complexity.