Delineating the risk factors of venous congestion: An analysis of 455 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps with radiographic correlation.

BACKGROUND: Venous congestion occurs in 2-15% of DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. We previously showed that thicker suprascarpal fat pads are associated with increased SIEV caliber and may, by extension, indicate a dominant superficial venous system. In this study, we aim to provide clinical correlation and to determine the risk factors of venous congestion in order to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from prophylactic SIEV dissection. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from August 2011 to August 2020. Radiographic measurements of suprascarpal fat pad thickness and SIEV diameter were collected per hemi-abdomen from preoperative imaging. The statistical analysis explored whether certain variables were associated with venous congestion. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients underwent 455 DIEP flaps. Suprascarpal fat pad thickness was positively correlated with SIEV diameter (r = 0.51, p<0.001), each with a mean caliber of 19.8 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively. Seven flaps (1.5%) developed venous congestion, with five requiring SIEV salvage and secondary venous anastomosis. Congested flaps had significantly thinner suprascarpal fat pads (12.3 vs. 20.0 mm, p = 0.043). All six congested flaps with imaging had suprascarpal thickness less than 18 mm, compared to 182 out of 335 non-congested flaps with imaging (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of venous congestion following DIEP flap reconstruction is significantly increased with thinner suprascarpal fat pads, suggesting that the mechanism of venous congestion may not be limited to superficial venous dominance. We recommend prophylactic SIEV dissection in all patients with suprascarpal fat pad thickness less than 18 mm.

A Bipedicled Flap for Closure of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor Site.

Anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flaps have become reliable options for head-to-toe reconstruction. Although perforator anatomy is fairly predictable, in cases of eccentric perforator location, we proposed shifting the entire flap laterally and preserving a medial bipedicled flap between the original incision and the new medial flap margin. This facilitates primary donor site closure instead of harvesting a flap larger than anticipated. We conducted a retrospective chart review of ALT flaps performed between 2007 and 2019 and identified patients who underwent bipedicled closure of the donor site. Demographics, flap characteristics, and surgical technique were evaluated. Six patients had bipedicled donor site closure related to primary perforators located lateral to the original flap design. The mean defect size was 91 cm2, and bipedicled flap width ranged from 4 to 6 cm. All donor sites were closed primarily. Five of the donor thigh sites healed without complications, and 1 patient had superficial delayed healing of the medial bipedicled incision, which healed with local wound care. The ALT has become an invaluable flap in microsurgical reconstruction, yet it is not without limitations. Primary donor site closure is generally not feasible for larger flaps, thus necessitating skin grafting of the donor site and/or prolonged wound care. Our technique facilitates primary closure of the donor site in patients who otherwise would have required harvest of a larger than necessary flap based on eccentric perforator anatomy. The medial bipedicled flap is straightforward, reproducible, and allows for modifications of the original flap design to better fit the defect.