Utilization and outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation and usual care for MDD in a large group psychiatric practice.

BACKGROUND: General psychiatrists' practice standards vary regarding when to implement transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for care of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Furthermore, few studies have examined real-world utilization and clinical outcomes of TMS. This study analyzed data from a large, multi-site psychiatric practice to evaluate utilization and outcomes of TMS as well as usual care (UC) for patients with MDD. METHODS: Depression outcomes for TMS and UC among adult patients at a multi-site psychiatric group practice were examined in this retrospective cohort analysis. Patients with a primary diagnosis of MDD, PHQ-9 ≥ 10, and a visit in November 2020 with 6-month follow-up were included and categorized into the TMS or UC cohorts. RESULTS: Of 1,011 patients with qualifying PHQ-9 at the baseline visit, 9% (89) received a full course of TMS, and 583 patients receiving UC met study inclusion criteria (339 patients were excluded due to lacking a 6-month follow-up visit or receiving esketamine during the study period). The TMS cohort had higher baseline PHQ-9 than UC (17.9 vs. 15.5, p < .001) and had failed more medication trials (≥ 4 vs. 3.1, p < .001). Mean PHQ-9 decreased by 5.7 points (SD = 6.7, p < .001) in the TMS cohort and by 4.2 points (SD = 6.4, p < .001) in the UC cohort over the study period. Among patients who had failed four or more antidepressant medications, PHQ-9 decreased by 5.8 points in the TMS cohort (SD = 6.7, p < .001) and by 3.2 points in the UC cohort (SD = 6.3, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: TMS utilization was low, despite TMS showing significant real-world clinical benefits. Future research should examine and address barriers to wider adoption of TMS into routine patient care for patients with treatment-resistant MDD. Wider adoption including routine use of TMS in less treatment-resistant patients will allow statistical comparisons of outcomes between TMS and UC populations that are difficult to do when TMS is underutilized.

Prodromal or Factitious Psychosis: A Cautionary Tale in the Era of Increasing Social Media Use by Vulnerable Individuals.

Research on the prodromal phase of schizophrenia has been ongoing for several decades and, more recently, findings from this research are being incorporated into everyday psychiatric practice, such as the use of interviews to evaluate prodromal symptomatology. This evolution is happening in the midst of an explosion of social media use by teenagers and young adults, increasing the exposure of youth to portrayals of psychiatric experiences. For example, reports from around the world of "TIK-TOK tics" emphasize the role of social media in the "creation" of psychiatric symptoms. This case report highlights the importance of a full psychiatric evaluation in acute care settings where quick treatment of psychotic symptoms is the norm. A 15-year-old patient was initially diagnosed with prodromal schizophrenia but, after a more extensive evaluation during a second admission, she was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Her antipsychotic treatment regimen was stopped and appropriate education and treatment were started, without the recurrence of "psychotic symptoms" during follow-up. It may be that patients with borderline personality disorder, a frequent condition on inpatient units, are at particular risk of assimilating symptoms as represented on social media.

Validation of a Nurse-Based Delirium-Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend daily delirium monitoring of hospitalized patients. Available delirium-screening tools have not been validated for use by nurses among diverse inpatients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate the Nursing Delirium-Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) under these circumstances. METHODS: A blinded cross-sectional and quality-improvement study was conducted from August 2015-February 2016. Nurses׳ Nu-DESC scores were compared to delirium diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) criteria. A total of 405 consecutive hospitalized patients were included. Nu-DESC-positive (threshold score ≥2) patients were matched with equal numbers of Nu-DESC-negative patients, by sex, age, and nursing unit. Nurses recorded a Nu-DESC score for each patient on every 12-hour shift. A Nu-DESC-blinded evaluator interviewed patients for 2 consecutive days. Delirium diagnosis was determined by physicians using DSM-5 criteria applied to collected research data. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nu-DESC were calculated. In an exploratory analysis, the performance of the Nu-DESC was analyzed with the addition of bedside measures of attention. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the Nu-DESC at a threshold of ≥2 was 42% (95% CI: 33-53%). Specificity was 98% (97-98%). At a threshold of ≥1, sensitivity was 67% (52-80%) and specificity 93% (90-95%). Similar results were found with the addition of attention tasks. CONCLUSION: The Nu-DESC is a specific delirium detection tool, but it is not sensitive at the usually proposed cut point of ≥2. Using a threshold of ≥1 or adding a test of attention increase sensitivity with a minor decrease in specificity.

Prospective cohort study of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease.

Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are potentially serious side effects of dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD), but prospective data are lacking about their incidence, time course, and risk factors. This work was a 4-year, prospective cohort study of outpatients with PD and no previous ICDs (N = 164). All subjects treated with a dopamine agonist during the study were followed longitudinally for new-onset ICDs. Baseline characteristics were compared in groups with (ICD+) and without (ICD-) subsequent ICDs. Forty-six subjects were treated with a dopamine agonist, including 25 who were newly treated and 21 who received ongoing dopamine agonist therapy. Of these 46 subjects, 18 (39.1%) developed new-onset ICDs. The timing of ICD onset varied from 3.0 to 114.0 months (median, 23.0) after initiation of dopamine agonist therapy. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in ICD+ and ICD- groups. At baseline, ICD+ subjects had a greater prevalence of motor complications (61.1% versus 25.0%; P = 0.01) than ICD- subjects, despite comparable total dopaminergic medication usage in both groups (median, 150.0 versus 150.0 levodopa equivalents; P = 0.61). Compared with ICD- subjects, ICD+ subjects had a greater baseline prevalence of caffeine use (100% versus 66.7%; P = 0.007) and higher lifetime prevalence of cigarette smoking (44.4% versus 14.3%; P = 0.04). Peak dopamine agonist doses were higher in ICD+ than ICD- subjects (median 300.0 versus 165.0 L-dopa equivalents; P = 0.03), but cumulative dopamine agonist exposure was similar in both groups. In summary, the timing of new-onset ICDs in PD is highly variable. Risk factors include cigarette smoking, caffeine use, motor complications, and higher peak dopamine agonist dosage.

Severely Mood-disordered Youth Respond Less Well to Treatment in a Community Clinic than Youth with Bipolar Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: A tremendous increase in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in pediatrics raises questions about current diagnostic practices. Even though researchers are providing initial follow-up data about rigorously diagnosed bipolar youth versus youth with severe nonbipolar mood symptomatology, not much is known about these different patient groups in the community. This study used standardized assessment tools to evaluate if meaningful differences emerge between different mood disorder types in children. DESIGN: The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Child/Adolescent Symptom Inventory were used to classify patients as having bipolar disorder or mood disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) according to criteria set forth by the National Institute of Mental Health. A retrospective chart review followed back the treatment for eight months. SETTING: A community mental health clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 41 pediatric patients between six and 18 years old. MEASUREMENTS: Global Assessment of Functioning scale and Clinical Global Impression scales were compared pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Patients with bipolar disorder improved significantly more than mood disorder NOS patients, despite similar levels of care. Meaningful differences in diagnostic and treatment variables were apparent at baseline and at endpoint. CONCLUSION: Standardized assessments in community clinics are feasible and lead to the identification of meaningful differences between "similar" patient groups. Improving diagnostic practices across different psychiatric settings appears paramount.