Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In the case of recurrent apical prolapse following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP), one may consider a "redo" procedure. We hypothesized that redo LSCP may carry an increased complication risk and less favorable outcomes when compared with primary procedures. METHODS: This is a single-center, matched case-control (1:4) study, comparing all 39 women who had a redo LSCP and 156 women who had a primary LSCP for symptomatic apical prolapse between 2002 and 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Matching was based on proximity to the operation date. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative and early postoperative complications within 3 months. Secondary outcomes included subjective (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] ≥4) and objective (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] stage <2) success rates, surgical variables, graft-related complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: There was no difference in the rate of intraoperative and early postoperative complications (redo: 21.1% vs control: 29.8%, OR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.27-1.48). The conversion rate was higher in redo patients (redo: 10.3% vs control: 0.6, OR: 17.71, 95% CI 1.92-163.39). Early postoperative complications were comparable: they were mainly infectious and managed by antibiotics. At a comparable follow-up (redo: 81 months (IQR: 54) vs control: 71.5 months (IQR: 42); p=0.37), there were no differences in graft-related complications (redo: 17.9% vs control: 9.6%, p=0.14) and reinterventions for complications (redo: 12.8% vs control: 5.1%, p=0.14) or prolapse (redo: 15.4% vs control: 8.3%, p=0.18). Subjective (redo: 88.5% vs control: 80.2%, p=0.41) and objective (redo: 31.8% vs control: 24.7%, p=0.50) success rates were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, redo LSCP is as safe and effective as a primary LSCP, but there is a higher risk of conversion.

Uterine hemangioma in pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine hemangioma is a rare benign vascular tumor which can cause bleeding problems in various age groups. Current knowledge on this rare condition in pregnancy is limited. We report on a recent case of uterine hemangioma in a pregnancy that was already diagnosed during her first trimester. We also provide a literature review to summarize the characteristics and outcomes of uterine hemangioma cases in pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was done of all published literature up to February 2021 using PubMed and Scopus databases. The selection process was registered using the online tool Rayyan QCRI. All data was described in a narrative format. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021237519). RESULTS: Fifteen case reports were included. In most cases, the diagnosis was established by antenatal ultrasound. More than half of the women developed a postpartum hemorrhage, necessitating a hysterectomy for bleeding control in half of the cases, although the risk for both seemed lower in those women in whom the hemangioma was diagnosed before delivery. One case of maternal mortality and two cases of fetal death were reported. There was one case of neonatal respiratory morbidity, although the neonatal data were not routinely reported upon. CONCLUSION: Current knowledge on uterine hemangioma in pregnancy is limited, but it seems to hold substantial risks for both pregnant women and their unborn child. We recommend routine screening for this condition at the standard mid-trimester anomaly scan. Pregnant women with uterine hemangioma should ideally be cared for in centers of expertise. An international registry will help to build a better understanding of this rare pathology.

Prevalence and clinical relevance of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the obstetric population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Routine screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pregnant women is common practice in many hospitals. However, little is known on its prevalence and clinical relevance in this population. In this prospective longitudinal study, we aimed to investigate the MRSA prevalence in our obstetric population, the rate of vertical transmission of MRSA and the potential clinical relevance of MRSA colonization for both mother and child. A possible correlation between GBS and MRSA colonization was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRSA screening samples were collected at 35-37 weeks of gestation (from mother), at delivery and at discharge (from mother and newborn). All samples were analyzed by conventional microbiological methods and MRSA strains were subjected to spa-typing to investigate genetic similarity. The medical records of all positive mother-child pairs were analyzed to detect the occurrence of clinical infection in the postpartum period. RESULTS: 679 mother-child pairs were included between June 2014 and July 2016. Maternal MRSA positivity rate was 1.3% at 35-37 weeks (vaginal/anorectal), 3.1% at delivery (nose/throat) and 3.6% at discharge (nose/throat). MRSA positivity in neonates was 0.3% at delivery and increased to 3% at discharge (nose/umbilicus). Almost all MRSA positive children were born to MRSA positive mothers (OR 120.40, 95% CI: 38.42-377.32). Genetic similarity of the MRSA strains found in mother and child was illustrated for all but one case. 57.7% of the cases of MRSA colonization in our cohort were associated with livestock exposure. 31% of the MRSA positive mothers developed an infectious complication in the postpartum period. No neonatal infectious complications were observed. GBS positivity was not a predictive factor for MRSA colonization in our cohort. CONCLUSION: The rate of MRSA colonization (overall 4.3%) in our obstetric population is similar to that described in the literature and that of the general population admitted to our hospital in the same period. Maternal MRSA colonization appeared to be an important risk factor for neonatal colonization. Whereas mothers were at higher risk of developing infectious morbidity in the postpartum period, no neonatal infectious complications were observed. We observed no correlation between GBS and MRSA colonization.