Neuraxial Anesthesia Is Associated With Decreased Pain Scores and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Opioid Requirement Compared With General Anesthesia in Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify the immediate postoperative differences in opioid use, pain scores, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS) after hip arthroscopy related to the type of anesthesia used for the surgical procedure. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with labral tears by a single surgeon at an academic center between October 2017 and July 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was PACU opioid administration, measured by morphine equivalents. Secondary parameters included total LOS, postincision LOS, PACU LOS, and PACU arrival/discharge pain scores. Analyses conducted were t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, or χ2 tests. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients met inclusion criteria for this study; 54 male and 75 female, with an average age of 28 (±10.1) years. In total, 52 (40.3%) had general anesthesia and 77 (59.7%) had neuraxial anesthesia, including spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, which were intermixed throughout the study period. Intraoperative and PACU opioid administration demonstrated a significant difference in medians. Neuraxial methods required a lower morphine equivalents in both the operating room (30.0 vs 53.9, P = .001) and PACU (18.2 vs 31.2, P = 0.002). Neuraxial anesthesia had lower median PACU arrival and discharge pain scores (0.0 vs. 5.0, P = .001, 3.0 vs. 4.0, P = .013). There was no statistically significant difference in postincision LOS or traction time. General anesthesia was associated with a longer PACU phase 1 time (1.0 vs 1.3 hours, P = .005). No major adverse events such as death, disability, or prolonged hospitalization occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial anesthesia use in routine hip arthroscopy was associated with lower immediate postoperative pain scores, lower intraoperative and immediate postoperative opioid requirements, and may be associated with shorter anesthesia recovery time without any major adverse events when compared with general anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

3D-printed models for periacetabular osteotomy surgical planning.

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and clinical benefits of using 3D-printed hemipelvis models for periacetabular osteotomy preoperative planning in the treatment of hip dysplasia. This retrospective study included 28 consecutive cases in 26 patients, with two bilateral cases, who underwent periacetabular osteotomy between January 2017 and February 2020 and had routine radiographs, CT and MR imaging. Of these, 14 cases [mean patient age 30.7 (SD 8.4) years, 11 female] had routine preoperative imaging, and 14 cases [mean patient age 28.0 (SD 8.7) years, 13 female] had routine preoperative imaging and creation of a full-scale 3D-printed hemipelvis model from the CT data. The expected surgical cuts were performed on the 3D-printed models. All patients underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Operative times, including time to achieve proper acetabular position and total periacetabular osteotomy time, fluoroscopy radiation dose and estimated total blood loss were compiled. ANOVA compared outcome variables between the two patient groups, controlling for possible confounders. On average, patients who had additional preoperative planning using the 3D-printed model had a 5.5-min reduction in time to achieve proper acetabular position and a 14.5-min reduction in total periacetabular osteotomy time; however, these changes were not statistically significant (P = 0.526 and 0.151, respectively). No significant difference was identified in fluoroscopy radiation dose or total blood loss. Detailed surgical planning for periacetabular osteotomy using 3D-printed models is feasible using widely available and affordable technology and shows promise to improve surgical efficiency.