RESUMEN
Hepatic encephalophaty (HE) is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with a prevalence in the cirrhotic population ranging from 20 to 80%. HE is a cause of inappropriate hospitalization, caregiver burdening and increased social costs. There is need to create dedicated care pathways to better manage patients and support family caregivers. The data used for the preparation of this diagnostic therapeutic assistance path (DTAP) are based on a detailed analysis of the scientific literature published before June 30, 2022 (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar). Furthermore, in the process of developing this work, we consulted in particular the guidelines/ position papers of International Society for Hepatic Encephalopathy and Nitrogen Metabolism (ISHEN), Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Italian Society on Alcohol (Società Italiana di Alcologia [SIA]) and other relevant papers. DTAP was created based on the most recent recommendations of the international scientific literature. The present DTAP highlight the need for a multidisciplinary activity integrated with territorial medicine in close connection with caregivers. This guarantees improved therapeutic adherence, hospital readmission reduction, improved quality of life for patients and caregivers and a significant reduction in costs.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , HígadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severely immunocompromised patients are at risk for prolonged or relapsed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination treatment in immunocompromised COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We included all immunocompromised patients with prolonged/relapsed COVID-19 treated with combination therapy with 2 antivirals (remdesivir plus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or molnupiravir in case of renal failure) plus, if available, anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), between February and October 2022. The main outcomes were virological response at day 14 (negative Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] swab) and virological and clinical response (alive, asymptomatic, with negative SARS-CoV-2 swab) at day 30 and the last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (Omicron variant in 17/18) were included: 18 received full combination of 2 antivirals and mAbs and 4 received 2 antivirals only; in 20 of 22 (91%) patients, 2 antivirals were nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus remdesivir. Nineteen (86%) patients had hematological malignancy, and 15 (68%) had received anti-CD20 therapy. All were symptomatic; 8 (36%) required oxygen. Four patients received a second course of combination treatment. The response rate at day 14, day 30, and last follow-up was 75% (15/20 evaluable), 73% (16/22), and 82% (18/22), respectively. Day 14 and 30 response rates were significantly higher when combination therapy included mAbs. Higher number of vaccine doses was associated with better final outcome. Two patients (9%) developed severe side effects (bradycardia leading to remdesivir discontinuation and myocardial infarction). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy including 2 antivirals (mainly remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and mAbs was associated with high rate of virological and clinical response in immunocompromised patients with prolonged/relapsed COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Antivirales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19/métodos , Recurrencia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Combinación de Medicamentos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The immunotherapy strategy for autoimmune encephalitis is based on several types and schedules of both first- and second-line drugs. Failing to respond to the latter prompts the use of non-conventional rescue therapies, with higher risks of severe adverse effects. We report on a protocol that entails the use of intravenous immunoglobulin cycles to bridge the 4-month period that the second-line drug rituximab needs to exert its full therapeutic effects. METHODS: Three patients with NMDAR encephalitis who were non-responders to first-line treatments entered the study. The protocol consisted of six monthly cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG, 0.4 mg/kg/die for 5 days), starting 1 month after the last rituximab infusion (1000 mg at days 0 and 15). Brain MRI and [18F]-FDG-PET were performed at onset and at six and 18 months after onset. RESULTS: In the three patients, substantial improvements of disability or complete recovery were achieved, without modifications over the 30-to-50-month follow-up. No adverse events nor laboratory test abnormalities were recorded. Imaging findings paralleled the favorable disease courses. Brain [18F]-FDG-PET was more sensitive than MRI in detecting abnormalities. DISCUSSION: Our observations suggest that the herein-described protocol might be used in patients with NMDAR encephalitis at risk for poor prognosis in the mid-term when they need to shift to rituximab. [18F]-FDG-PET confirmed to be a sensitive tool to detect the minimal brain lesions that can underlie isolated cognitive and psychiatric symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato/diagnóstico por imagen , Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Receptores de N-Metil-D-AspartatoRESUMEN
Data on the long-term durability of rilpivirine (RPV) are still scarce. A two-center retrospective study was performed, including all people living with HIV (PLWH) treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)/RPV or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC/RPV in the period January 2013-December 2019. Aims of the study were to assess the rate of discontinuation of the RPV single-tablet regimen (STR) and identify factors associated with the risk of discontinuation according to Cox's regression analysis. A total of 684 PLWH were enrolled. Mean duration of RPV-STR treatment was 192.5 (±99.5) weeks for 123 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve participants (18%) and 173.3 (± 85.6) weeks for 561 ART-experienced study participants (82%). During the study period, the incidence of discontinuation was 7.7 per 100 person-years. The estimated proportions of discontinuation after 48 and 96 weeks were 5.6% and 13.4%, respectively. Causes of discontinuation were loss to follow-up (30%), side effects (15%), ART optimization (14%), virological failure (VF) (12%), death or transfer to another center (9%), low adherence (7%), drug interactions (6%), simplification to dual therapy (3%), and unknown (3%). No differences were observed in cumulative probability of discontinuation between ART-naïve and -experienced PLWH. Heterosexual (hazard ratio [HR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.8) and mother-to-child (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-15.3) transmission of HIV infection and history of previous VF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. High RPV-STR effectiveness and durability were confirmed in our real-life population of PLWH. Given these data, RPV has the potential to be a drug for life in patients selected according to current guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , VIH-1 , Emtricitabina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rilpivirina/farmacología , Rilpivirina/uso terapéutico , Comprimidos , Tenofovir/farmacología , Tenofovir/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parsonage-Turner syndrome is an acute peripheral neuropathy that affects the upper brachial plexus region. Previously published reports demonstrate that the condition can be triggered by surgery, infection, autoimmune diseases, strenuous exercise, trauma, radiation, and vaccination. Parsonage-Turner syndrome has already been reported in three other patients who were vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 51-year-old Caucasian man without comorbidities who received the first dose of the ChAdOx1-S recombinant vaccine (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca, Oxford, UK) against coronavirus disease 2019 and was diagnosed with Parsonage-Turner syndrome. A few days after getting vaccinated, the patient reported a progressive increase in pain in the region of vaccine administration. One month later, the shoulder pain was followed by symptoms of hypoesthesia and muscle weakness on abduction and elevation of the left upper limb. Neurological examination revealed an atrophy of the proximal muscles of the left upper limb, accompanied by paresis of the left deltoid, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and infraspinatus muscles. Electroneuromyography carried out 3 months after the onset of symptoms showed signs consistent with brachial plexus neuritis. The adverse reaction has been properly reported to the Italian Pharmacovigilance System (Italian Medicines Agency-Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. CONCLUSION: The increased awareness of such association is essential for early identification and diagnosis and, thus, better clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neuritis del Plexo Braquial , COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to explore the effect of a eucaloric ketogenic diet (EKD) on mortality, admission to the intensive care unit, and need for non-invasive ventilation in hospitalized patients with COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19), in comparison to a eucaloric standard diet. Secondary objectives were verification of the safety and feasibility of the diet and its effects on inflammatory parameters, particularly interleukin-6. METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of 34 patients fed with an EKD in comparison to 68 patients fed with a eucaloric standard diet, selected and matched using propensity scores 1:2 to avoid the confounding effect of interfering variables. Our hypothesis was that an EKD would reduce mortality, admission to the intensive care unit, and need for non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: The preliminary multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in survival (P = 0.046) and need for the intensive care unit (P = 0.049) for the EKD compared with a eucaloric standard diet. Even considering the EKD start day as a time-dependent variable, the results maintain a positive trend for application of the diet, and it is not possible to reject the null hypothesis (P < 0.05). Interleukin-6 concentrations between t0 and t7 (7 d after the beginning of the diet) in the ketogenic nutrition group show a trend that is almost significant (P = 0.062). The EKD was safe and no adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a possible therapeutic role of an EKD in the clinical management of COVID-19. Currently, a prospective controlled randomized trial is running to confirm these preliminary data.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to respiratory failure due to severe immune response. Treatment targeting this immune response might be beneficial but there is limited evidence on its efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine if early treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with tocilizumab and/or steroids was associated with better outcome. METHODS: This observational single-center study included patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were not intubated and received either standard of care (SOC, controls) or SOC plus early (within 3 days from hospital admission) anti-inflammatory treatment. SOC consisted of hydroxychloroquine 400mg bid plus, in those admitted before March 24th, also darunavir/ritonavir. Anti-inflammatory treatment consisted of either tocilizumab (8mg/kg intravenously or 162mg subcutaneously) or methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg for 5 days or both. Failure was defined as intubation or death, and the endpoints were failure-free survival (primary endpoint) and overall survival (secondary) at day 30. Difference between the groups was estimated as Hazard Ratio by a propensity score weighted Cox regression analysis (HROW). RESULTS: Overall, 196 adults were included in the analyses. They were mainly male (67.4%), with comorbidities (78.1%) and severe COVID-19 pneumonia (83.7%). Median age was 67.9 years (range, 30-100) and median PaO2/FiO2 200 mmHg (IQR 133-289). Among them, 130 received early anti-inflammatory treatment with: tocilizumab (n = 29, 22.3%), methylprednisolone (n = 45, 34.6%), or both (n = 56, 43.1%). The adjusted failure-free survival among tocilizumab/methylprednisolone/SOC treated patients vs. SOC was 80.8% (95%CI, 72.8-86.7) vs. 64.1% (95%CI, 51.3-74.0), HROW 0.48, 95%CI, 0.23-0.99; p = 0.049. The overall survival among tocilizumab/methylprednisolone/SOC patients vs. SOC was 85.9% (95%CI, 80.7-92.6) vs. 71.9% (95%CI, 46-73), HROW 0.41, 95%CI: 0.19-0.89, p = 0.025. CONCLUSION: Early adjunctive treatment with tocilizumab, methylprednisolone or both may improve outcomes in non-intubated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Darunavir/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/administración & dosificación , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
AIM: During the last decade a continuous increase in non-albicans species isolation has been observed with Candida parapsilosis being one of the leading species. Aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of candidemia, particularly of C parapsilosis, its predictors and clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incidences of candidemia was evaluated analyzing data from both a prospective collection (2012-2016) and a retrospective one (2008-2011). Predictors and outcome were based only on the prospective phase. C parapsilosis potential clusters were analysed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique. RESULTS: 1240 episodes were identified. Incidences of candidemia increased from 1.97 episodes/10 000 patient-days in 2008 to 4.59/10 000 patient-days in 2016 (P < .001), mainly due to an increase of C parapsilosis (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 1.04, P < .001). 33.0% of C parapsilosis strains were resistant to fluconazole; no resistance to echinocandins was found. Independent predictors of C parapsilosis candidemia were time of infection (P = .007), previous use of echinocandins (P < .0001) and year in which the episode was registered (P < .0001). 30 days mortality was 32.4% for C parapsilosis, with a significant difference compared to C non-parapsilosis. Potential clonal C parapsilosis strains were detected by genetic analyses, showing RAPD profile A as the most represented (72.6% of isolates). DISCUSSION: C parapsilosis candidemia is an emerging issue in our center, possibly attributed to some extent to horizontal transmission of the pathogen, as confirmed by the analysis of isolates similarities. Further microbiological and epidemiological investigations are needed in order to identify the most effective measures to reduce the rate of this infection.
Asunto(s)
Candida parapsilosis , Candidemia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida parapsilosis/efectos de los fármacos , Candida parapsilosis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Técnica del ADN Polimorfo Amplificado Aleatorio , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related hospitalizations has decreased worldwide in recent years, due to the availability of combined antiretroviral therapies (cART). The present analysis aimed to analyse the economic, and clinical burden of HIV management, after the introduction of systematic use of cART. METHODS: Data from HIV-infected patients, treated at Policlinico San Martino Hospital in Genova (Italy) were retrospectively collected. A comparison between years 2009 and 2015 was performed. HIV-related admissions were identified by using the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) codes. The resource consumption of outpatient services was derived by using a modelling approach. Expenditure for drugs was also analysed, as aggregate data. RESULTS: The number of HIV-infected patients was 898 in 2009 and 1006 in 2015. Overall, the virological success rate improved from 2009 to 2015, as the percentage of patients with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL increased from 79 to 89% (P < 0.05). The average incidence of hospitalizations per-patient decreased from 0.30 in 2009, to 0.13 in 2015. Average expenditure per-patient decreased from 10,107 in 2009 to 9063 in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis confirmed the role of cART in controlling HIV viral load and, consequently, in reducing hospitalizations, admissions to day-hospital and the use of outpatient services. Clinical improvements and economic savings more than compensated the investments required to treat HIV-infected patients with cART. Health Authorities should invest in modern cART supply and universal treatment, to use at best the available resources and obtain a cost-effective improvement of health in people living with HIV. Additional research, with the involvement of different centers and the use of patient-specific data, are recommended to consolidate the findings of this analysis.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Fármacos Anti-VIH/economía , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Bases de Datos Factuales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
A technical error led to incorrect rendering of the author group in this article. The correct authorship is as follows: Daniele Roberto Giacobbe1, Valerio Del Bono1, Malgorzata Mikulska1, Giulia Gustinetti1, Anna Marchese2, Federica Mina3, Alessio Signori4, Andrea Orsi5, Fulvio Rudello6, Cristiano Alicino5, Beatrice Bonalumi3, Alessandra Morando7, Giancarlo Icardi5, Sabrina Beltramini3, Claudio Viscoli1; On behalf of the San Martino Antimicrobial Stewardship Group.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The overuse of antimicrobials favors the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, as well as invasive fungal diseases and Clostridium difficile infections (CDI). In this study, we assessed the impact of a mixed educational and semi-restrictive antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) project in a large teaching hospital in Italy. METHODS: The AMS project was conducted from May 2014 to April 2016. It consisted of two initiatives in two consecutive periods: (1) educational activities; (2) semi-restrictive control of antimicrobial prescribing through a computerized software. The primary endpoint was consumption of antibacterials and antifungals. Secondary endpoints were incidence of CDI, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) BSI, and Candida BSI. RESULTS: During the study period, a statistically significant reduction in consumption was observed for antibacterials (-1.45 defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days monthly, 95% confidence intervals [CI] -2.38 to -0.52, p 0.004), mainly driven by reductions in the use of fluoroquinolones, third/fourth generation cephalosporins, and carbapenems. No decrease in consumption of antifungals was observed (-0.04 DDD/1000 patient-days monthly, 95% CI -0.34 to +0.25, p 0.750). A statistically significant trend towards reduction was observed for incidence of CRKP BSI (incidence rate ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p 0.013). No statistically significant variations in trends were observed for CDI, MRSA BSI, and Candida BSI. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed AMS project was effective in reducing the use of major antibacterials and the incidence of CRKP BSI. Further research is needed to assess the extent of long-term benefits of semi-restrictive approaches.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Candidiasis/sangre , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy has become a promising approach for the treatment of NSCLC. In order to stimulate the host immune system against tumour antigens, several cancer vaccines have been generated and evaluated. Belagenpumatucel-L is a whole tumour cell vaccine expressing the antisense strand of the TGF-ß2 gene. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this article is to review the most relevant findings of clinical trials testing belagenpumatucel-L in advanced NSCLC patients. EXPERT OPINION: Although the Phase III trial investigating belagenpumatucel-L in stage III/IV patients did not meet its primary end point, a survival benefit was observed in several subgroups of patients. Further studies are needed in order to select patients who may benefit from this vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta2/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Originally formulated as an intravenous (i.v.) agent, vinorelbine is also currently available as an oral chemotherapeutic agent. Oral vinorelbine has demonstrated significant activity in different settings for NSCLC, including adjuvant treatment for resected disease, concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC and palliative chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, as part of combination schedules or as a single-agent treatment. AREAS COVERED: The authors explored the available data describing the use of oral vinorelbine in NSCLC. PubMed articles and abstracts presented at international conferences were analysed, and relevant trials were reported and discussed. Specific settings, including the treatment of elderly and unfit patients and metronomic schedules including oral vinorelbine, were evaluated. Available pharmacoeconomic data were also assessed. EXPERT OPINION: Oral vinorelbine is an appealing agent, particularly as part of combination regimens containing platinum derivatives, although it can have a role as a single-agent treatment as well. Its safety profile is generally favourable and its route of administration is generally preferred by patients receiving chemotherapy. Compared to i.v. vinorelbine and other antineoplastic agents, oral vinorelbine has been reported to be advantageous in terms of cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Antineoplásicos/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/economía , VinorelbinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The cost of new anti-cancer drugs has dramatically increased in recent years, and countermeasures are required in order to limit pharmaceutical expenses. Sponsored clinical trials that provide drugs free of charge may be a useful tool in order to reduce drug costs. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the effect of clinical trials on pharmaceutical expenditure savings. METHODS: We evaluated the cost of drugs administered in clinical practice and in clinical trials (considering only the standard regimens that were administered also in clinical practice) in 2010 at the Lung Cancer Unit of the National Institute for Cancer Research in Genoa, Italy. The cost of drugs was calculated on the price charged at our Institute in 2010. The supposed cost of experimental treatment replacing standard therapy was converted in the cost of the treatments that would have been chosen in clinical practice, considering histology, line of treatment and number of administered cycles. RESULTS: From 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2010, 196 patients affected by lung cancer or pleural mesothelioma were treated. 152 patients (78%) received treatment in clinical practice or in non-sponsored trials (18 patients in 4 trials), while 44 (22%) were treated in one of the 12 sponsored clinical trials recruiting in 2010. Globally, 606 cycles of treatment would have been administered to patients, of which 436 (72%) were administered in clinical practice or in non-sponsored trials and 170 (28%) were administered in pharmaceutical company sponsored clinical trials. The overall cost of those anti-neoplastic drugs, based on the prices charged at our Institute in 2010, was 799 803. The cost of drugs administered in clinical practice or in non-sponsored trials was 556 649 (70%), whereas the cost of standard drugs administered in clinical trials was 243 154 (30%). The grants provided by pharmaceutical companies were evaluated and amounted to 235 965. CONCLUSIONS: The participation in sponsored clinical trials in which drugs are provided free of charge offers substantial cost savings for the National Health Service; moreover, the grants received for each enrolled patient produced additional income.