RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on abortion care-seeking in Maryland, a state with Medicaid coverage for abortion, high service availability, and laws supporting abortion rights. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 15 women who had an abortion between January 2021 and March 2022 at a hospital-based clinic in a mid-sized Maryland city. We purposively recruited participants with varied pandemic financial impacts. Interview questions prompted participants to reflect on how the pandemic affected their lives, pregnancy decisions, and experiences seeking abortion care. We analyzed our data for themes. RESULTS: All participants had some insurance coverage for their abortion; over half paid using Medicaid. Many participants experienced pandemic financial hardship, with several reporting job, food, and housing insecurity as circumstances influencing their decision to have an abortion. Most women who self-reported minimal financial hardship caused by the pandemic indicated they sought an abortion for reasons unrelated to COVID-19. In contrast, women with economic hardship viewed their pregnancies as unsupportable due to COVID-19 exacerbating financial instability, even when they desired to continue the pregnancy. All participants expressed that having an abortion was the best decision for their lives. Yet, when making decisions about their pregnancy, the most financially disadvantaged women weighed their desires against the pandemic's constraints on their reproductive self-determination. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic changed abortion care-seeking circumstances even in a setting with minimal access barriers. Financial hardship influenced some women to have an abortion for a pregnancy that-while unplanned-they may have preferred to continue.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , COVID-19 , Medicaid , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto , Embarazo , Maryland , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Estados Unidos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Adulto Joven , Pandemias , Investigación Cualitativa , Entrevistas como Asunto , Cobertura del SeguroRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been substantial progress in developing approaches to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth. However, less is known about the differences in measurement approaches. In this study, we compare measures of mistreatment obtained from the same women using labour observations and community-based surveys in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria. METHODS: Experiences of mistreatment during childbirth are person-centred quality measures. As such, we assessed individual-level and population-level accuracy of labour observation relative to women's self-report for different types of mistreatment. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement and population-level inflation factor (IF), assessing prevalence of mistreatment in labour observation divided by 'true' prevalence in women's self-report. We report the IF degree of bias as: low (0.75Asunto(s)
Dolor
, Parto
, Femenino
, Humanos
, Embarazo
, Autoinforme
, Ghana
, Guinea/epidemiología
, Nigeria
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a commonly proposed explanation for increasing rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in the United States: shifts in the birthing population to older maternal ages, a known risk factor for SMM. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing delivery hospitalizations from two time points (2008-2009 to 2017-2018) using hospital discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample. We used demographic decomposition techniques to evaluate whether increasing rates of SMM and nontransfusion SMM were explained by population-level increases in maternal age or changes in age-specific rates. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Rates of SMM and nontransfusion SMM significantly increased in the United States between 2008 and 2018 from 135.6 to 170.5 and 58.8 to 67.9 per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations, respectively, with increases observed for nearly all racial and ethnic groups. Over this same period, the proportion of births to people younger than age 25 years decreased and births to people of advanced maternal age (35 years and older) increased, with the largest increases occurring among people identified as non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native (9.8-13.0%), non-Hispanic Black (10.7-14.4%), and Hispanic (12.1-17.1%). Decomposition analyses indicated that the changing maternal age distribution had little effect on SMM trends. Rather, increases in SMM and nontransfusion SMM were primarily driven by increases in age-specific SMM rates, including rising rates among younger people. Contributions of maternal age shifts were minimal for all racial and ethnic groups except among non-Hispanic Black people, for which 17-34% of the rise in SMM was due to increasing maternal age. CONCLUSION: Except among certain racial groups, increases in U.S. population-level SMM rates over the past decade were due to increases in age-specific rates rather than shifts to older maternal age among the birthing population. Increasing SMM rates across the maternal age spectrum could indicate worsening prepregnancy health status of the birthing population.
Asunto(s)
Edad Materna , Morbilidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Morbilidad/tendencias , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
One of the most common barriers to using effective family planning methods is the belief that hormonal contraceptives and contraceptive devices have adverse effects on future fertility. Recent evidence from high-income settings suggests that some hormonal contraceptive methods are associated with delays in return of fecundity, yet it is unclear if these findings generalize to low- and middle-income populations, especially in regions where the injectable is widely used and pressure to bear children is significant. Using reproductive calendar data pooled across 47 Demographic and Health Surveys, we find that the unadjusted 12-month probability of pregnancy for women attempting pregnancy after discontinuing traditional methods, condoms, the pill, and the IUD ranged from 86% to 91%. The 12-month probability was lowest among those who discontinued injectables and implants, with approximately 1 out of 5 women not becoming pregnant within one year after discontinuation. Results from multivariable analysis showed that compared with users of either periodic abstinence or withdrawal, users of the pill, IUD, injectable, and implant had lower fecundability following discontinuation, with the largest reductions occurring among women who used injectables and implants. These findings indicate that women's concerns about potential short-term reductions in fecundity following contraceptive use are not unfounded.
Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Países en Desarrollo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Fertilidad , Anticonceptivos , Servicios de Planificación FamiliarRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This exploratory study aimed to assess COVID-19-related changes in abortion service availability and use in Washington, DC, Maryland, and Virginia. DESIGN: Data came from a convenience sample of eight abortion clinics in this region. We implemented a cross-sectional survey and collected retrospective aggregate monthly abortion data overall and by facility type, abortion type, and patient characteristics for March 2019-August 2020. We evaluated changes in the distribution of the total number of patients for March-August in 2019 compared to March-August 2020. We also conducted segmented regression analyses and produced scatter plots of monthly abortion patients overall and by facility type, abortion type, and patient characteristics, with separate fitted regression lines from the segmented regression models for the pre- and during-COVID-19 periods. RESULTS: Five clinics reported a reduced number of appointments early in the pandemic while four reported increased call volume. There were declines in the monthly abortion trend at hospital-based clinics at the outset of the pandemic. Monthly number of medication abortions increased from March 2020 through August 2020 compared to pre-COVID-19 trends while instrumentation abortions 11 up to 19 weeks decreased. The share of abortions to Black individuals increased during the early phase of the pandemic, as did the monthly trend in abortions among this group. We also saw changes in payment type, with declines in patients paying out-of-pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed differences in abortion services, numbers, and types during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Washington, DC, Maryland, and Virginia.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , COVID-19 , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Maryland/epidemiología , Virginia/epidemiología , District of Columbia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Aborto LegalRESUMEN
Black birthing people are twice as likely to experience severe maternal morbidity (SMM) as their white counterparts. Structural racism provides a framework for understanding root causes of perinatal health disparities. Our objective was to investigate associations between measures of structural racism and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among Black birthing people in the US. We linked delivery hospitalizations for Black birthing people in the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2011) with data from the American Community Survey 5-year estimates and the Vera Institute of Justice Incarceration Trends datasets (2008-2011). Structural racism measures included the Index of Concentration at the Extremes for race and income (i.e., racialized economic segregation) and Black-white incarceration inequality, assessed as quintiles by hospital county. Multilevel logistic regression assessed the relationship between these county-level indicators of structural racism and SMM. Black birthing people delivering in quintiles 5 (concentrated deprivation; OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.16-1.81) and 3 (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04-1.56) experienced increased odds of SMM compared to those in quintile 1 (concentrated privilege). After adjusting for individual characteristics, obstetric comorbidities, and hospital characteristics the odds of SMM remained elevated for Black birthing people delivering in quintiles 5 (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.02-1.71) and 3 (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.02-1.51). Delivering in the quintile with the highest incarceration inequality (Q5) was not significantly associated with SMM (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.72-1.25) compared to those delivering in counties with the lowest incarceration inequality (Q1). In this national-level study, racialized economic segregation was associated with SMM among Black birthing people. Our findings highlight the need to promote maternal and perinatal health equity through actionable policies that prioritize investment in communities experiencing deprivation.
Asunto(s)
Racismo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Comorbilidad , Hospitalización , Renta , Racismo Sistemático , Población NegraRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postpartum care (PPC) is a key component of maternal health, particularly for people who use opioids during pregnancy. Little is known about the prevalence and correlates of PPC visit attendance among those using opioids compared with nonusers in a privately insured population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using nationwide private insurance claims between 2011 and 2017 (N = 1,291,352 women) comparing the following opioid use groups: nonusers, nonchronic prescription users, chronic prescription users, and women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated the odds of PPC attendance and the mean time to an initial PPC visit for each user group. Stratified models identified factors associated with PPC attendance by opioid use type. RESULTS: Overall, 45% of the cohort attended a PPC visit and nearly 10% had any opioid use during pregnancy. More women in the three opioid use categories attended PPC than nonusers (50-56% vs. 45%). Opioid use regardless of type was associated with higher odds and earlier PPC visitation than women with no opioid use; nonchronic and chronic users had 17% and 40% greater odds of PPC than nonusers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.19; aOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.34-1.46), whereas women with OUD had 7% higher odds (aOR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00-1.13). Antenatal care and psychiatric, hypertensive, and pain conditions were most strongly associated with higher odds of attending PPC; older maternal age was negatively associated with PPC. Stratified analysis showed opioid correlates varied similarly across user groups. CONCLUSIONS: PPC use was generally low in this study cohort of privately insured women. Women who used opioids and those with chronic conditions had greater odds of attending PPC. Improved efforts are needed to engage people in PPC, as well as service integration and coordination for people who use opioids during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Seguro , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Posnatal , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Many people wanted to avoid or delay childbearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study sought to examine the extent COVID-19 influenced abortion care-seeking in a region that did not enact policy restricting abortion due to the pandemic, has high service availability, and few abortion-restrictive policies. METHODOLOGY: We conducted telephone surveys with adults (n=72) requesting abortion appointments between September 2020 and March 2021 at five clinics in Washington, DC, Maryland, and Virginia. We used χ2 tests to compare sociodemographic, reproductive history, service delivery characteristics, and pandemic-related life changes by whether COVID-19 influenced abortion care-seeking. RESULTS: Most respondents (93%) had an abortion at the time of the survey, 4% were awaiting their scheduled appointment, and 3% did not have an appointment scheduled. Nearly 40% of people reported COVID-19 influenced their decision to have an abortion. These individuals were significantly more likely to report "not financially prepared" (44% vs. 16%) as a reason for termination compared to people reporting no influence of COVID-19. They were also more likely to have lost or changed their health insurance due to pandemic-related employment changes (15% vs. 2%), report substantial money difficulties due to COVID-19 (59% vs. 33%), and report that paying for their abortion was "very difficult" (25% vs. 2%). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 influenced many people to have an abortion, particularly those financially disadvantaged by the pandemic. Expansion of Medicaid abortion coverage in Washington, DC and Virginia could reduce financial barriers to care and help people to better meet their reproductive needs amid future crises.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , District of Columbia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Maryland/epidemiología , Pandemias , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Virginia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: High and increasing levels of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity in the U.S. indicate that the underlying health status of reproductive-aged women may be far from optimal, yet few studies have examined mortality trends and disparities exclusively among this population. METHODS: All-cause and cause-specific mortality data for 1999-2019 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER Underlying Cause of Death database. Levels and trends in mortality between 1999 and 2019 for women aged 15-44 years stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and state were examined. Given the urgent need to address pregnancy-related health disparities, the correlation between all-cause and pregnancy-related mortality rates across states for the years 2015-2019 was also examined. RESULTS: Age-adjusted, all-cause mortality rates among women aged 15-44 years improved between 2003 and 2011 but worsened between 2011 and 2019. The recent increase in mortality among this age group was not driven solely by increases in external causes of death. Patterns differed by age, race/ethnicity, and geography, with non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaskan Native women having 2.3 and non-Hispanic Black women having 1.4 times the risk of all-cause mortality in 2019 compared with that of non-Hispanic White women. Age-adjusted all-cause mortality rates and pregnancy-related mortality rates were strongly correlated at the state level (r=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing mortality among reproductive-aged women has substantial implications for maternal, women's, and children's health. Given the high correlation between pregnancy-related mortality and all-cause mortality at the state level, addressing the structural factors that shape mortality risks may have the greatest likelihood of improving women's health outcomes across the life course.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Mortalidad , Salud de la Mujer , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Mortalidad/etnología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer/etnología , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Mistreatment of women during childbirth is increasingly recognised as a significant issue globally. Research and programmatic efforts targeting this phenomenon have been limited by a lack of validated measurement tools. This study aimed to develop a set of concise, valid and reliable multidimensional measures for mistreatment using labour observations applicable across multiple settings. METHODS: Data from continuous labour observations of 1974 women in Nigeria (n=407), Ghana (n=912) and Guinea (n=655) were used from the cross-sectional WHO's multicountry study 'How women are treated during facility-based childbirth' (2016-2018). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to develop a scale measuring interpersonal abuse. Two indexes were developed through a modified Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development approach for generating composite indexes. Measures were evaluated for performance, validity and internal reliability. RESULTS: Three mistreatment measures were developed: a 7-item Interpersonal Abuse Scale, a 3-item Exams & Procedures Index and a 12-item Unsupportive Birth Environment Index. Factor analysis results showed a consistent unidimensional factor structure for the Interpersonal Abuse Scale in all three countries based on factor loadings and interitem correlations, indicating good structural construct validity. The scale had a reliability coefficient of 0.71 in Nigeria and approached 0.60 in Ghana and Guinea. Low correlations (Spearman correlation range: -0.06-0.19; p≥0.05) between mistreatment measures supported our decision to develop three separate measures. Predictive criterion validation yielded mixed results across countries. Both items within measures and measure scores were internally consistent across countries; each item co-occurred with other items in a measure, and scores consistently distinguished between 'high' and 'low' mistreatment levels. CONCLUSION: The set of concise, comprehensive multidimensional measures of mistreatment can be used in future research and quality improvement initiatives targeting mistreatment to quantify burden, identify risk factors and determine its impact on health and well-being outcomes. Further validation and reliability testing of the measures in other contexts is needed.
Asunto(s)
Parto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age (AMA) has been linked to both higher risk of adverse birth outcomes and higher levels of comorbidities. It is unclear if adverse outcomes are higher for older healthy women. This study examined the association between AMA and adverse birth outcomes among women with and without preexisting and pregnancy-related health conditions. METHODS: Analysis of data for 14,933 singleton births between 2004 and 2015 from the population-based Maryland Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System was conducted, comparing women aged 20-34 years and 35 years and older. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the difference in odds of preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) by age group among women with and without health conditions. The analysis of women without health conditions was stratified by parity. RESULTS: Among women without health conditions, AMA was associated with higher odds of PTB regardless of birthweight, LBW regardless of term, LBW term births, and LBW PTBs; stratified analysis showed higher risk of these outcomes among both older primiparas and multiparas. Compared with younger women with hypertensive disorders, older women with similar health conditions had higher odds of PTB regardless of birthweight. Older women with asthma had higher odds of LBW term births. CONCLUSIONS: AMA is associated with adverse birth outcomes among women with and without health conditions compared with younger women with similar health status. Improved screening and management of health conditions during pregnancy is needed for older women, regardless of parity.
Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Maryland/epidemiología , Edad Materna , Paridad , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Labour companionship refers to support provided to a woman during labour and childbirth, and may be provided by a partner, family member, friend, doula or healthcare professional. A Cochrane systematic review of interventions by Bohren and colleagues, concluded that having a labour companion improves outcomes for women and babies. The presence of a labour companion is therefore regarded as an important aspect of improving quality of care during labour and childbirth; however implementation of the intervention is not universal. Implementation of labour companionship may be hampered by limited understanding of factors affecting successful implementation across contexts. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the review were to describe and explore the perceptions and experiences of women, partners, community members, healthcare providers and administrators, and other key stakeholders regarding labour companionship; to identify factors affecting successful implementation and sustainability of labour companionship; and to explore how the findings of this review can enhance understanding of the related Cochrane systematic review of interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and POPLINE K4Health databases for eligible studies from inception to 9 September 2018. There were no language, date or geographic restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis; focused on women's, partners', family members', doulas', providers', or other relevant stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of labour companionship; and were from any type of health facility in any setting globally. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used a thematic analysis approach for data extraction and synthesis, and assessed the confidence in the findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We used two approaches to integrate qualitative findings with the intervention review findings. We used a logic model to theorise links between elements of the intervention and health and well-being outcomes. We also used a matrix model to compare features of labour companionship identified as important in the qualitative evidence synthesis with the interventions included in the intervention review. MAIN RESULTS: We found 51 studies (52 papers), mostly from high-income countries and mostly describing women's perspectives. We assessed our level of confidence in each finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We had high or moderate confidence in many of our findings. Where we only had low or very low confidence in a finding, we have indicated this.Labour companions supported women in four different ways. Companions gave informational support by providing information about childbirth, bridging communication gaps between health workers and women, and facilitating non-pharmacological pain relief. Companions were advocates, which means they spoke up in support of the woman. Companions provided practical support, including encouraging women to move around, providing massage, and holding her hand. Finally, companions gave emotional support, using praise and reassurance to help women feel in control and confident, and providing a continuous physical presence.Women who wanted a companion present during labour and childbirth needed this person to be compassionate and trustworthy. Companionship helped women to have a positive birth experience. Women without a companion could perceive this as a negative birth experience. Women had mixed perspectives about wanting to have a male partner present (low confidence). Generally, men who were labour companions felt that their presence made a positive impact on both themselves (low confidence) and on the relationship with their partner and baby (low confidence), although some felt anxious witnessing labour pain (low confidence). Some male partners felt that they were not well integrated into the care team or decision-making.Doulas often met with women before birth to build rapport and manage expectations. Women could develop close bonds with their doulas (low confidence). Foreign-born women in high-income settings may appreciate support from community-based doulas to receive culturally-competent care (low confidence).Factors affecting implementation included health workers and women not recognising the benefits of companionship, lack of space and privacy, and fearing increased risk of infection (low confidence). Changing policies to allow companionship and addressing gaps between policy and practice were thought to be important (low confidence). Some providers were resistant to or not well trained on how to use companions, and this could lead to conflict. Lay companions were often not integrated into antenatal care, which may cause frustration (low confidence).We compared our findings from this synthesis to the companionship programmes/approaches assessed in Bohren's review of effectiveness. We found that most of these programmes did not appear to address these key features of labour companionship. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We have high or moderate confidence in the evidence contributing to several of these review findings. Further research, especially in low- and middle-income settings and with different cadres of healthcare providers, could strengthen the evidence for low- or very low-confidence findings. Ahead of implementation of labour companionship, researchers and programmers should consider factors that may affect implementation, including training content and timing for providers, women and companions; physical structure of the labour ward; specifying clear roles for companions and providers; integration of companions; and measuring the impact of companionship on women's experiences of care. Implementation research or studies conducted on labour companionship should include a qualitative component to evaluate the process and context of implementation, in order to better interpret results and share findings across contexts.
Asunto(s)
Doulas , Familia , Amigos , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Chaperones Médicos , Parto/psicología , Esposos , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Masculino , Defensa del Paciente , Prioridad del Paciente , Atención Perinatal , Embarazo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Female sex workers (FSW) have a heightened vulnerability to violence and negative sexual/reproductive health outcomes. Limited research has examined how experiencing physical and sexual violence (PSV) mediates risk for poor health outcomes among FSW in Swaziland. The present analyses aim to contribute to literature linking violence with poor health outcomes, high-risk behaviors, and reduced health service-seeking among FSW. Data were analyzed from a cross-sectional study conducted in Swaziland between July and September 2011 with 325 adult women who reported exchanging sex for money, goods, or favors in the last 12 months, recruited through respondent-driven sampling (RDS). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between PSV and ancillary violence/abuse exposures, risk behaviors, and sexual/reproductive and mental health outcomes. PSV was conceptualized as either ever having been beaten up as a result of selling sex or ever being forced to have sex since the age of 18, or both. Prevalence of PSV in this sample was 59.0% in crude estimation, and 48.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]:[39.2,57.6]) with RDS weighting. Separate RDS-weighted estimates of being beaten up as a result of sex work and ever being forced to have sex were 32.4% (95%CI=[24.4,40.4]) and 33.1% (95%CI =[25.0,41.2%]), respectively. Experiencing PSV was associated with being blackmailed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]= 1.93, 95%CI= [1.07,3.52]), non-injection drug use in the last 12 months (aOR= 1.84, 95%CI= [1.02,3.33]), and feeling afraid to seek health services as a result of selling sex (aOR = 1.74, 95%CI= [1.01,2.99]). Given these findings, violence prevention strategies should be prioritized in programs that address Swazi FSW health, empowerment, and safety.