Propranolol to decrease time to delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of propranolol on time to delivery among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched from inception to December 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of propranolol on time to delivery among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor were included. RCTs that included stillbirth before randomization, non-randomized trials, observational, cohort, case control, or studies in which the control group included an intervention other than standard care were excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Primary outcome was time to delivery after administration of propranolol among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor. The summary measures were reported as summary mean difference (MD) or relative risk with 95% of confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine RCTs including 1,182 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Five studies investigated the effect of propranolol among patients undergoing induction of labor (IOL) and demonstrated a significant decrease in time to delivery (MD, -91.5 minutes, 95% CI -110.6 to -72.4). Four studies investigated the effect of propranolol among patients undergoing augmentation of labor and showed no significant decrease in time to delivery (MD, -2.98 minutes, 95% CI -21.6 to 15.6). Our pooled analysis demonstrated that the use of propranolol in IOL and augmentation was associated with a decrease in time to delivery from administration of propranolol compared to placebo (mean difference, -46.15 minutes, 95% CI -59.48 to -32.81). The meta-analysis found no increased risk of PPH, blood transfusion, cesarean delivery rates, or NICU admission with the use of propranolol during labor. CONCLUSION: The use of propranolol during induction of labor shortens overall time to delivery by about 91 minutes and did not significantly decrease time to delivery in those undergoing augmentation of labor.

Early magnesium discontinuation postpartum and eclampsia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal duration of magnesium administration postpartum for prevention of eclampsia has not yet been established. Our objective was to investigate the effect of early discontinuation of postpartum magnesium on the rates of postpartum eclampsia compared to continuation for 24-hours postpartum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searches were performed using keywords related to "preeclampsia" and "magnesium sulfate" from inception of database until August 2023. Randomized controlled trials of women with preeclampsia were included if they received magnesium prior to delivery and were randomized to early discontinuation versus 24-hours of magnesium postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of postpartum eclampsia. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 2183 women were included with five different magnesium administration time frames. In total, seven patients with postpartum eclampsia were reported in three studies. Eclampsia rates were not different between the two groups (5/1088 (0.5 %) after early discontinuation, versus 2/1095 (0.2 %) in the 24-hour group; RR 2.25, 95 % CI 0.5-9.9, I2 = 0 %, 8 studies, 2183 participants). A number needed to treat was calculated; 374 women would need to receive 24-hours of magnesium postpartum to prevent one episode of postpartum eclampsia. The early discontinuation group had a significant decrease in time to ambulation (-9.1 h, 95 % CI -14.7 - (-3.6), I2 = 98 %, 3 studies, 1509 participants) and breastfeeding (-8.4 h, 95 % CI -12.0 - (-4.8), I2 = 98 %, 2 studies, 1397 participants). CONCLUSIONS: Early magnesium discontinuation postpartum, usually ≤6 h or none at all, did not significantly increase the rate of postpartum eclampsia, however this study is likely underpowered to demonstrate a difference. The number needed to treat is similar to the number needed to treat for antepartum preeclampsia without severe features, for which magnesium is not recommended. The largest proportion of women did not receive magnesium postpartum after receiving at least 8 h of magnesium intrapartum (e.g., loading and maintenance dose). Thus, it is reasonable to consider not using magnesium postpartum, particularly if a woman has received similar adequate dose prior to delivery.

Severe perineal lacerations in induction of labor versus expectant management: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if induction of labor (IOL) is associated with an increased risk of severe perineal laceration. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINHAL using a combination of keywords and text words related to "induction of labor," "severe perineal laceration," "third-degree laceration," "fourth-degree laceration," and "OASIS" from inception of each database until January 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IOL to expectant management of a singleton, cephalic pregnancy at term gestation that reported rates of severe perineal laceration. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS AND METHODS: The primary outcome of interest was severe perineal laceration, defined as 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations. We conducted meta-analyses using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to determine the relative risks (RR) or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bias was assessed using guidelines established by Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. RESULTS: A total of 11,187 unique records were screened and ultimately eight RCTs were included, involving 13,297 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe perineal lacerations between the IOL and expectant management groups (209/6655 [3.1%] vs 202/6641 [3.0%]; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85, 1.26). There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean birth (1090/6655 [16.4%] vs 1230/6641 [18.5%], RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82, 0.95) and fetal macrosomia (734/2696 [27.2%] vs 964/2703 [35.7%]; RR 0.67: 95% CI 0.50, 0.90) in the IOL group. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the risk of severe perineal lacerations between IOL and expectant management in this meta-analysis of RCTs. Furthermore, there is a lower rate of cesarean births in the IOL group, indicating more successful vaginal deliveries with similar rates of severe perineal lacerations. Patients should be counseled that in addition to the known benefits of induction, there is no increased risk of severe perineal lacerations.

The association between uterine fibroid number and size and risk of preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: While the association between uterine fibroids and preterm birth is well known, data regarding whether fibroid characteristics such as number and size modify such risk are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between fibroid number and size and risk of preterm birth and determine whether these characteristics impact the severity of preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with singleton gestations who had at least one prenatal ultrasound at 18 0/7 weeks of gestation or later and delivered within a large university health system from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022. When fibroids were identified on ultrasound, their characteristics (i.e., number, size, and location) were documented. Patients with more than one delivery during the study period had only their first included for analysis. The primary outcome of preterm birth, stratified by gestational age (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks), was assessed based on fibroid number (1, 2, ≥3) and size (largest dimension <5 cm, 5-10 cm, >10 cm) separately in patients who had prenatally detected fibroids compared to those with no fibroids. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Data were presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among the 65,950 patients studied, 4,421 (6.7%) had at least one fibroid. The prevalence of preterm birth <37 weeks was 8.6%. The presence of any fibroid, regardless of number, was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth <37 weeks compared to no fibroids (1 fibroid: 12.8% vs. 8.2%, aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44; 2 fibroids: 12.7% vs. 8.2%, aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.58; ≥3 fibroids: 18.5% vs. 8.2%, aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.29-1.99). Patients with 2 fibroids were at increased risk of preterm birth <34, <32, and <28 weeks compared to those without fibroids, while patients with ≥3 fibroids were at increased risk of preterm birth <34 and <28 weeks compared to those without fibroids. The presence of at least one fibroid, regardless of the size of their largest dimension, was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth <37 weeks compared to no fibroids (<5 cm: 12.4% vs. 8.2%, aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.36; 5-10 cm: 15.5% vs. 8.2%, aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.75; >10 cm: 21.4% vs. 8.2%, aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.55-3.28). Increasing fibroid size by largest dimension was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth <34 weeks. Patients with fibroids >10 cm by largest dimension were at increased risk of preterm birth <28 weeks compared to those without fibroids. There was no association between increasing fibroid size by largest dimension and preterm birth <32 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this large cohort suggest that fibroid characteristics such as number and size are associated with preterm birth and impact the severity of preterm birth. Increasing fibroid number and size is associated with a higher risk of earlier preterm birth compared to those without fibroids.

SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: When pregnant patients present with nonobstetric pathology, the physicians caring for them may be uncertain about the optimal management strategy. The aim of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations for pregnant patients presenting with common surgical pathologies including appendicitis, biliary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee convened a working group to address these issues. The group generated five key questions and completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. An expert panel then met to form evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Expert opinion was utilized when the available evidence was deemed insufficient. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed on ten recommendations addressing the management of appendicitis, biliary disease, and IBD during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of appendectomy over nonoperative treatment of appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over nonoperative treatment of biliary disease and acute cholecystitis specifically. Based on expert opinion, the panel also suggested either operative or nonoperative treatment of biliary diseases other than acute cholecystitis in the third trimester, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rather than common bile duct exploration for symptomatic choledocholithiasis, applying the same criteria for emergent surgical intervention in pregnant and non-pregnant IBD patients, utilizing an open rather than minimally invasive approach for pregnant patients requiring emergent surgical treatment of IBD, and managing pregnant patients with active IBD flares in a multidisciplinary fashion at centers with IBD expertise.

The effect of cervical pessary on increasing gestational age at delivery in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic short cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: The incidence of preterm delivery is much higher in twin pregnancies than in singletons and even higher if a short cervical length is detected in the second trimester. Studies are contradictory regarding the efficacy of a cervical pessary to decrease preterm birth in twin pregnancies and short cervical length. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of cervical pessary in prolonging gestation, preventing preterm birth, and reducing adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.org were searched for randomized controlled trials from inception to June 2023. Study eligibility criteria: In this study, randomized controlled trials comparing the cervical pessary to expectant management in the pregnant population with twin gestations and asymptomatic short cervix were included. Methods: The Cochrane risk-of-bias-2 tool for randomized controlled trials was used for the evaluation of the risk of bias in included studies. A meta-analysis was performed by calculating risk ratio and mean difference with their 95% confidence interval using the random effects model or fixed effect model on the basis of heterogeneity and accounting for potential covariates among the included randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Cervical pessary did not significantly increase the gestational age at delivery in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic patients (mean difference, 0.36 weeks [-0.27 to 0.99]; P=.270; I2=72.0%). Moreover, the cervical pessary use did not result in a reduction of spontaneous or all-preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.88 [0.77-1.00]; P=.061; I2=0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in the composite neonatal adverse outcomes (risk ratio, 1.001 [0.86-1.16]; P=.981; I2=20.9%), including early respiratory morbidity, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and confirmed sepsis. Conclusion: The use of cervical pessary in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic short cervix does not seem to be effective in increasing the gestational age at delivery, preventing preterm birth, or reducing adverse neonatal outcomes. This indicates that alternative interventions should be sought for the management of this patient population.

Evidence-based cesarean delivery: preoperative management (part 7).

Preoperative preparation for cesarean delivery is a multistep approach for which protocols should exist at each hospital system. These protocols should be guided by the findings of this review. The interventions reviewed and recommendations made for this review have a common goal of decreasing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality related to cesarean delivery. The preoperative period starts before the patient's arrival to the hospital and ends immediately before skin incision. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends showering with either soap or an antiseptic solution at least the night before a procedure. Skin cleansing in addition to this has not been shown to further decrease rates of infection. Hair removal at the cesarean skin incision site is not necessary, but if preferred by the surgical team then clipping or depilatory creams should be used rather than shaving. Preoperative enema is not recommended. A clear liquid diet may be ingested up to 2 hours before and a light meal up to 6 hours before cesarean delivery. Consider giving a preoperative carbohydrate drink to nondiabetic patients up to 2 hours before planned cesarean delivery. Weight-based intravenous cefazolin is recommended 60 minutes before skin incision: 1-2 g intravenous for patients without obesity and 2 g for patients with obesity or weight ≥80 kg. Adjunctive azithromycin 500 mg intravenous is recommended for patients with labor or rupture of membranes. Preoperative gabapentin can be considered as a way to decrease pain scores with movement in the postoperative period. Tranexamic acid (1 g in 10-20 mL of saline or 10 mg/kg intravenous) is recommended prophylactically for patients at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage and can be considered in all patients. Routine use of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is recommended preoperatively and is to be continued until the patient is ambulatory. Music and active warming of the patient, and adequate operating room temperature improves outcomes for the patient and neonate, respectively. Noise levels should allow clear communication between teams; however, a specific decibel level has not been defined in the data. Patient positioning with left lateral tilt decreases hypotensive episodes compared with right lateral tilt, which is not recommended. Manual displacers result in fewer hypotensive episodes than left lateral tilt. Both vaginal and skin preparation should be performed with either chlorhexidine (preferred) or povidone iodine. Placement of an indwelling urinary catheter is not necessary. Nonadhesive drapes are recommended. Cell salvage, although effective for high-risk patients, is not recommended for routine use. Maternal supplemental oxygen does not improve outcomes. A surgical safety checklist (including a timeout) is recommended for all cesarean deliveries.

Birthweights at term have increased globally: insights from a systematic review of 183 million births.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess global trends in mean birthweights at term, as reported in peer-reviewed literature. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to September 2023, using combinations of the search terms: "birth weight"; "birth-weight"; "birthweight"; "trend". There were no restrictions based on language or geographic area. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all ecological and observational studies reporting mean birthweight at term as a continuous numerical variable over time. METHODS: We assessed the quality of included studies using the Dufault and Klar checklist modified by Betran et al. Univariate and multivariate linear models were used to examine the effects of time (years) and geographical origins. Subgroup analyses focused on national data sources and on data collected from 1950 onward. RESULTS: Among 6447 reviewed articles, 29 met our criteria, reporting mean birthweight data from over 183 million infants worldwide. Most studies were hospital-based (48.3%), 44.8% used national data, and a minority used municipality, community, or regional data (6.9%). Geographically, North America (31.0%) had the highest representation, followed by Asia and Europe (27.6% each), and South America and Oceania (6.9% each). Our univariate linear regression model (Model 1) revealed a significant increase in mean birthweight at term over time (4.74 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 3.95-5.53; P<.001). Model 2, incorporating continental dummy variables into the first model, confirmed this trend (3.85 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 2.96-4.74; P<.001). Model 3, focusing on available national data, did not find a significant relationship. Model 4 narrowed its focus on records from 1950 onward, reporting a robust annual increase of 7.26 g/y (95% confidence interval, 6.19-8.33; P<.001). Model 5, adjusting for the number of participants included in each study, reported a conclusive mean term birthweight increase of 1.46 g/y (95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.18; P<.001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review of 29 studies shows an increase in term birthweights over time, particularly when considering data since 1950. Limitations include study quality variations, data source diversity, and data sparsity, underscoring the need for future research to use precise gestational age distinctions and predetermined time frames to gain a deeper understanding of this trend and its implications for maternal and child health.

One-step vs 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening and pregnancy outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients screened with the 1-step or 2-step screening method for gestational diabetes mellitus. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception up to September 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials were included. Studies that had overlapping populations were excluded (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration number: CRD42022358903). METHODS: Risk ratios were computed with 95% confidence intervals by 2 authors. Unpublished data were requested. Large for gestational age was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The search yielded 394 citations. Moreover, 7 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 54,650 participants were screened for gestational diabetes mellitus by either the 1-step screening method (n=27,163) or the 2-step screening method (n=27,487). For large for gestational age, there was no significant difference found between the groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05; I2=0%). Newborns of patients who underwent 1-step screening had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (risk ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.34; I2=0%) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.21; I2=0%) than newborns of patients who underwent 2-step screening. Patients in the 1-step screening method group were more likely to be diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (risk ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.09; I2=80%) than patients in the 2-step screening method group. In addition, among trials that tested all patients before randomization and excluded patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus, newborns were more likely to have macrosomia (risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.34; I2=0%). Overall risk of bias assessment was of low concern. CONCLUSION: Large for gestational age did not differ between patients screened using the 1-step screening method and those screened using the 2-step screening method. However, patients randomized to the 1-step screening method had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission and maternal gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis than the patients randomized to the 2-step screening method.

Concurrent progestogen and cerclage to reduce preterm birth: a multicenter international retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Both progestogens and cerclage are individually effective in preterm birth prevention in high risk pregnancies. However, national and international guidelines cite a lack of data available to comment on the potential benefit of concurrent progestogen therapy after cerclage has been placed. Studies to date have been small with mixed results regarding benefit of concurrent progestogen with cerclage leaving uncertainty regarding best clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether cerclage with progestogen therapy was superior to cerclage alone in the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. METHODS: This is an international retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, without major anomaly or aneuploidy, and with cerclage placed at 10 different institutions in the United States and Colombia from June 2016 to June 2020. Exclusion criteria were lack of documentation regarding whether progestogen was prescribed, unavailable delivery outcome, and pregnancy termination (spontaneous or induced) before 16 weeks' gestation. The exposure of interest was progestogen use with cerclage placement, which included those who continued to use progestogen or who started progestogen after cerclage. The comparison group consisted of those without progestogen use after cerclage placement, which included those who had no progestogen use during the entire pregnancy or who initiated progestogen and then stopped it after cerclage placement. Progestogen type, cerclage indication, maternal baseline characteristics, and maternal/neonatal outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks. The secondary outcomes were spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks, gestational age at delivery, and a composite neonatal outcome including ≥1 of the following: perinatal mortality, confirmed sepsis, grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. There were planned subgroup analyses by cerclage indication, progestogen type (vaginal progesterone vs 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate), preterm birth history, and site. Continuous variables were compared in adjusted analyses with analysis of covariance, and categorical variables were compared with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders with adjusted odds ratio. A Cox regression survival curve was generated to compare latency to spontaneous delivery, censored after 37 weeks. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 699 singletons met the inclusion criteria: 561 in the progestogen with cerclage group and 138 with cerclage alone. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the higher likelihood of previous spontaneous preterm birth in the progestogen group (61% vs 41%; P<.001). Within the progestogen group, 52% were on 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate weekly, 44% on vaginal progesterone daily, and 3% on oral progesterone daily. Progestogen with cerclage was associated with a significantly lower frequency of spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks (31% vs 39%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.59 [0.39-0.89]; P=.01) and <34 weeks (19% vs 27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.87]; P=.01), increased latency to spontaneous delivery (hazard ratio for spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks, 0.66 [0.49-0.90]; P=.009), and lower frequency of perinatal death (7% vs 16%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.37 [0.20-0.67]; P=.001). In planned subgroup analyses, association with reduced odds of preterm birth <37 weeks persisted in those on vaginal progesterone, those without a previous preterm birth, those with ultrasound- or examination-indicated cerclage, those who started progestogen therapy before cerclage, and in sites restricted to the United States. CONCLUSION: Use of progestogen with cerclage was associated with reduced rates of spontaneous preterm birth and early spontaneous preterm birth compared with cerclage alone. Although this study was not sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis, the strength of evidence for benefit appeared greatest for those with ultrasound- or examination-indicated cerclage, and with vaginal progesterone. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

Universal cervical length screening and risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of spontaneous preterm birth with or without universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening at the time of midtrimester scan. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to November 12, 2023, using combinations of the relevant medical subject heading terms, key words, and word variants that were considered suitable for the topic. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies including individuals with singleton gestations at 16-25 weeks of gestation screened or not screened with universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening were considered eligible. Primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks; secondary outcomes were spontaneous preterm birth <34 and <32 weeks. METHODS: Random effect head-to-head analyses were used to directly compare each outcome, expressing the results as summary odds ratio and relative 95% confidence interval. The quality of the included studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers, using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled studies. The study was registered on the prospective register of systematic reviews database (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42022385325). RESULTS: Eight studies, including 447,864 pregnancies, were included in the meta-analysis (213,064 screened with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length and 234,800 unscreened). In the overall analysis, universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length did not significantly decrease the spontaneous preterm birth rates <37 weeks (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.01], P=.07) and <34 weeks (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.04], P=.12), but was significantly associated with a lower risk of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (odds ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94], P=.002). Individuals without a prior spontaneous preterm birth had a significantly lower risk of spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks (odds ratio, 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.97], P=.01) and a lower trend of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.01], P=.06) when screened with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length, compared with no screening. CONCLUSION: Universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening usually <24 weeks in singletons without a prior spontaneous preterm birth, is associated with a significant reduction in spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks, compared with no screening.

Contractions of the lower uterine segment during transvaginal ultrasound cervical length: incidence, significance, proper measurement, and management.

An accurate transvaginal ultrasound cervical length is paramount to obtain the best prediction for preterm birth. Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should be optimally obtained when a lower uterine segment contraction is not seen. For universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening at approximately 20 weeks of gestation, the options are to do the transvaginal ultrasound soon after bladder void (lower uterine segment contractions present in 16%-43% of this approach) or to wait until the end of the anatomy scan (ideally within 30 minutes after bladder voiding) to decrease the chance of a lower uterine segment contraction. If the lower uterine segment contraction persists even after waiting up to 20 minutes or more, only the true transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should be reported. In particular, in patients with a previous spontaneous preterm birth, if the lower uterine segment contraction persists, the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length can be repeated in ≤7 days even in the presence of a normal (>25 mm) cervical length. Similar to a blood pressure cuff that must be of the right size for proper blood pressure measurement and a glucometer that must be properly calibrated, screening with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should only be performed following a proper and standardized technique, including avoiding as much as feasible the presence of lower uterine segment contractions.

Factors Associated with Provider Counseling Against Breastfeeding in the Setting of Marijuana Use: A Population-Based Survey.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to explore patient demographic factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. METHODS: A cross-sectional study derived using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in collaboration with state and local health departments. This study sample included survey participants whose responses indicate they received counseling discouraging breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the relationship between factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. RESULTS: Of the 10,911 participants in this sample, 9,695 participants who answered the question about receiving counseling discouraging breastfeeding while using marijuana were included in the analysis (89% response rate for the total sample). Twenty nine percent of participants were advised by a provider not to breastfeed while using marijuana. Participants who received this counseling were more likely to be people of color, age less than or equal to 29, with a high school education or less, unmarried, report governmental or no insurance prepregnancy, and report marijuana use postpartum. In the multivariate analysis, age less than or equal to 20 (P = .001), being unmarried (P = .023), and marijuana use postpartum (P = .034) remained associated with counseling against breastfeeding. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that individuals are being counseled differently. Unmarried and young people (age <20 years) were more likely to report receiving counseling against breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Given the growing national acceptability of marijuana use, the known benefits of breastfeeding, and the unclear risks of marijuana in human milk, there is a need to standardize counseling to avoid a missed opportunity to educate breastfeeding populations who use marijuana and to reduce the risk of counseling based on providers' personal attitudes and biases not aligned with evidence-based guidelines.

Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in pregnancies with placenta previa and risk of perinatal adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between cervical length and the risk of adverse outcomes in placenta previa pregnancies. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of cervical length in predicting emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage was evaluated. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched up to January 21, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies investigating the relationship between cervical length and maternal adverse outcomes in patients with placenta previa were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of cervical length measured at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation for the prediction of emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage. The secondary outcomes were the probability of antenatal bleeding, preterm birth (both iatrogenic and spontaneous), and postpartum hemorrhage >2000 mL. Insufficient data were available on the transfusion procedure in cases where the cervical length was <30 mm. METHODS: For prognostic analysis, the random-effects model was used to pool the odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. For the diagnostic part, we used a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve, pooled sensitivities and specificities, area under the curve, and summary likelihood ratios. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies presenting data on 1462 pregnancies with placenta previa were included. Cervical length ≤30 mm at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation had a sensitivity of 61% (95% confidence interval, 43-77), specificity of 83% (95% confidence interval, 76-88), and area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.86) for the prediction of emergency cesarean delivery. Furthermore, cervical length ≤30 mm was associated with antenatal bleeding (odds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-6.26; P<.001; I2=54.8%), preterm birth (odds ratio, 8.46; 95% confidence interval, 3.05-23.44; P<.001; I2=83.6%), and postpartum hemorrhage (odds ratio, 6.89; 95% confidence interval, 4.51-10.53; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION: Short cervical length (≤30 mm) measured at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation can assist in predicting the risk of emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage in pregnancies with placenta previa. Furthermore, short cervical length is significantly associated with the risk of antenatal bleeding, preterm birth, and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnancies with placenta previa.