Guselkumab treatment normalizes the stratum corneum ceramide profile and alleviates barrier dysfunction in psoriasis: results of a randomized controlled trial.

The epidermal inflammation associated with psoriasis drives skin barrier perturbations. The skin barrier is primarily located in stratum corneum (SC). Its function depends on the SC lipid matrix of which ceramides constitute important components. Changes in the ceramide profile directly correlate to barrier function. In this study, we characterized the dynamics of the barrier function and ceramide profile of psoriatic skin during anti-Interleukin-23 therapy with guselkumab. We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in which 26 mild-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients were randomization 3:1-100 mg guselkumab or placebo for 16 weeks and barrier dynamics monitored throughout. Barrier function was measured by trans-epidermal water loss measurements. Untargeted ceramide profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry after SC was harvested using tape-stripping. The barrier function and ceramide profile of lesional skin normalized to that of controls during treatment with guselkumab, but not placebo. This resulted in significant differences compared to placebo at the end of the treatment. Changes in the lesional ceramide profile during treatment correlated with barrier function and target lesion severity. Nonlesional skin remained similar throughout treatment. Guselkumab therapy restored the skin barrier in psoriasis. Concomitant correlations between skin barrier function, the ceramide profile, and disease severity demonstrate their interdependency.

Intradermal substance P as a challenge agent in healthy individuals.

Pharmacological challenge models are deployed to evaluate drug effects during clinical development. Intradermal injection of Substance P (SP) neuropeptide, a potential challenge agent for investigating local mediators, is associated with wheal and flare response mediated by the MRGPRX2 receptor. Although dose-dependent data on SP effects exist, full characterization and information on potential carryover effect after repeated challenge are lacking. This open-label, two-part, prospective enabling study of SP intradermal challenge in healthy participants aimed to understand and distinguish between wheal and flare responses following various SP doses. Part 1 included one challenge visit to determine optimum SP dose range for evaluation in part 2, which determined variability in 20 participants and used intradermal microdialysis (IDM) for SP-challenged skin sampling. At 5, 15, 50, and 150 pmol doses, respectively, posterior median area under the curve (AUC; AUC0-2h ) was 4090.4, 5881.2, 8846.8, and 9212.8 mm2 /min, for wheal response, and 12020.9, 38154.3, 65470.6, and 67404.4 mm2 /min for flare response (SP-challenge visit 2). When the challenge was repeated ~2 weeks later, no carryover effect was observed. IDM histamine levels were relatively low, resulting in low confidence in the data to define temporal characteristics for histamine release following SP challenge. No safety concerns were identified using SP. Wheal and flare responses following intradermal SP challenge were dose-dependent and different. The results indicate that this challenge model is fit-for-purpose in future first-in-human studies and further assessment of novel drugs targeting dermal inflammatory disease responses, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, chronic inducible urticaria, and pseudo-allergic reactions.