Diagnostic utility of DNA methylation analysis in genetically unsolved pediatric epilepsies and CHD2 episignature refinement.

Sequence-based genetic testing identifies causative variants in ~ 50% of individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). Aberrant changes in DNA methylation are implicated in various neurodevelopmental disorders but remain unstudied in DEEs. We interrogate the diagnostic utility of genome-wide DNA methylation array analysis on peripheral blood samples from 582 individuals with genetically unsolved DEEs. We identify rare differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and explanatory episignatures to uncover causative and candidate genetic etiologies in 12 individuals. Using long-read sequencing, we identify DNA variants underlying rare DMRs, including one balanced translocation, three CG-rich repeat expansions, and four copy number variants. We also identify pathogenic variants associated with episignatures. Finally, we refine the CHD2 episignature using an 850 K methylation array and bisulfite sequencing to investigate potential insights into CHD2 pathophysiology. Our study demonstrates the diagnostic yield of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis to identify causal and candidate variants as 2% (12/582) for unsolved DEE cases.

Solving the Etiology of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy with Spike-Wave Activation in Sleep (D/EE-SWAS).

OBJECTIVE: To understand the etiological landscape and phenotypic differences between 2 developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) syndromes: DEE with spike-wave activation in sleep (DEE-SWAS) and epileptic encephalopathy with spike-wave activation in sleep (EE-SWAS). METHODS: All patients fulfilled International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) DEE-SWAS or EE-SWAS criteria with a Core cohort (n = 91) drawn from our Epilepsy Genetics research program, together with 10 etiologically solved patients referred by collaborators in the Expanded cohort (n = 101). Detailed phenotyping and analysis of molecular genetic results were performed. We compared the phenotypic features of individuals with DEE-SWAS and EE-SWAS. Brain-specific gene co-expression analysis was performed for D/EE-SWAS genes. RESULTS: We identified the etiology in 42/91 (46%) patients in our Core cohort, including 29/44 (66%) with DEE-SWAS and 13/47 (28%) with EE-SWAS. A genetic etiology was identified in 31/91 (34%). D/EE-SWAS genes were highly co-expressed in brain, highlighting the importance of channelopathies and transcriptional regulators. Structural etiologies were found in 12/91 (13%) individuals. We identified 10 novel D/EE-SWAS genes with a range of functions: ATP1A2, CACNA1A, FOXP1, GRIN1, KCNMA1, KCNQ3, PPFIA3, PUF60, SETD1B, and ZBTB18, and 2 novel copy number variants, 17p11.2 duplication and 5q22 deletion. Although developmental regression patterns were similar in both syndromes, DEE-SWAS was associated with a longer duration of epilepsy and poorer intellectual outcome than EE-SWAS. INTERPRETATION: DEE-SWAS and EE-SWAS have highly heterogeneous genetic and structural etiologies. Phenotypic analysis highlights valuable clinical differences between DEE-SWAS and EE-SWAS which inform clinical care and prognostic counseling. Our etiological findings pave the way for the development of precision therapies. ANN NEUROL 2024.

Experience of the first adult-focussed undiagnosed disease program in Australia (AHA-UDP): solving rare and puzzling genetic disorders is ageless.

BACKGROUND: Significant recent efforts have facilitated increased access to clinical genetics assessment and genomic sequencing for children with rare diseases in many centres, but there remains a service gap for adults. The Austin Health Adult Undiagnosed Disease Program (AHA-UDP) was designed to complement existing UDP programs that focus on paediatric rare diseases and address an area of unmet diagnostic need for adults with undiagnosed rare conditions in Victoria, Australia. It was conducted at a large Victorian hospital to demonstrate the benefits of bringing genomic techniques currently used predominantly in a research setting into hospital clinical practice, and identify the benefits of enrolling adults with undiagnosed rare diseases into a UDP program. The main objectives were to identify the causal mutation for a variety of diseases of individuals and families enrolled, and to discover novel disease genes. METHODS: Unsolved patients in whom standard genomic diagnostic techniques such as targeted gene panel, exome-wide next generation sequencing, and/or chromosomal microarray, had already been performed were recruited. Genome sequencing and enhanced genomic analysis from the research setting were applied to aid novel gene discovery. RESULTS: In total, 16/50 (32%) families/cases were solved. One or more candidate variants of uncertain significance were detected in 18/50 (36%) families. No candidate variants were identified in 16/50 (32%) families. Two novel disease genes (TOP3B, PRKACB) and two novel genotype-phenotype correlations (NARS, and KMT2C genes) were identified. Three out of eight patients with suspected mosaic tuberous sclerosis complex had their diagnosis confirmed which provided reproductive options for two patients. The utility of confirming diagnoses for patients with mosaic conditions (using high read depth sequencing and ddPCR) was not specifically envisaged at the onset of the project, but the flexibility to offer recruitment and analyses on an as-needed basis proved to be a strength of the AHA-UDP. CONCLUSION: AHA-UDP demonstrates the utility of a UDP approach applying genome sequencing approaches in diagnosing adults with rare diseases who have had uninformative conventional genetic analysis, informing clinical management, recurrence risk, and recommendations for relatives.

Familial aggregation of seizure outcomes in four familial epilepsy cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible effects of genetics on seizure outcome by estimating the familial aggregation of three outcome measures: seizure remission, history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures, and seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medication. METHODS: We analyzed families containing multiple persons with epilepsy in four previously collected retrospective cohorts. Seizure remission was defined as being 5 and 10 years seizure-free at last observation. Total number of tonic-clonic seizures was dichotomized at <4 and ≥4 seizures. Seizure control in patients taking antiseizure medication was defined as no seizures for 1, 2, and 3 years. We used Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) to estimate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the family-specific random effect, controlling for epilepsy type, age at epilepsy onset, and age at last data collection as fixed effects. We analyzed each cohort separately and performed meta-analysis using GLMMs. RESULTS: The combined cohorts included 3644 individuals with epilepsy from 1463 families. A history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures showed strong familial aggregation in three separate cohorts and meta-analysis (ICC .28, 95% confidence interval [CI] .21-.35, Bayes factor 8 × 1016). Meta-analyses did not reveal significant familial aggregation of seizure remission (ICC .08, 95% CI .01-.17, Bayes factor 1.46) or seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medication (ICC .13, 95% CI 0-.35, Bayes factor 0.94), with heterogeneity among cohorts. SIGNIFICANCE: A history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures aggregated strongly in families, suggesting a genetic influence, whereas seizure remission and seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medications did not aggregate consistently in families. Different seizure outcomes may have different underlying biology and risk factors. These findings should inform the future molecular genetic studies of seizure outcomes.

Exploring individual fixel-based white matter abnormalities in epilepsy.

Diffusion MRI has provided insight into the widespread structural connectivity changes that characterize epilepsies. Although syndrome-specific white matter abnormalities have been demonstrated, studies to date have predominantly relied on statistical comparisons between patient and control groups. For diffusion MRI techniques to be of clinical value, they should be able to detect white matter microstructural changes in individual patients. In this study, we apply an individualized approach to a technique known as fixel-based analysis, to examine fibre-tract-specific abnormalities in individuals with epilepsy. We explore the potential clinical value of this individualized fixel-based approach in epilepsy patients with differing syndromic diagnoses. Diffusion MRI data from 90 neurologically healthy control participants and 10 patients with epilepsy (temporal lobe epilepsy, progressive myoclonus epilepsy, and Dravet Syndrome, malformations of cortical development) were included in this study. Measures of fibre density and cross-section were extracted for all participants across brain white matter fixels, and mean values were computed within select tracts-of-interest. Scanner harmonized and normalized data were then used to compute Z-scores for individual patients with epilepsy. White matter abnormalities were observed in distinct patterns in individual patients with epilepsy, both at the tract and fixel level. For patients with specific epilepsy syndromes, the detected white matter abnormalities were in line with expected syndrome-specific clinical phenotypes. In patients with lesional epilepsies (e.g. hippocampal sclerosis, periventricular nodular heterotopia, and bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia), white matter abnormalities were spatially concordant with lesion location. This proof-of-principle study demonstrates the clinical potential of translating advanced diffusion MRI methodology to individual-patient-level use in epilepsy. This technique could be useful both in aiding diagnosis of specific epilepsy syndromes, and in localizing structural abnormalities, and is readily amenable to other neurological disorders. We have included code and data for this study so that individualized white matter changes can be explored robustly in larger cohorts in future work.

Somatic mosaicism in focal epilepsies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past decade, it has become clear that brain somatic mosaicism is an important contributor to many focal epilepsies. The number of cases and the range of underlying pathologies with somatic mosaicism are rapidly increasing. This growth in somatic variant discovery is revealing dysfunction in distinct molecular pathways in different focal epilepsies. RECENT FINDINGS: We briefly summarize the current diagnostic yield of pathogenic somatic variants across all types of focal epilepsy where somatic mosaicism has been implicated and outline the specific molecular pathways affected by these variants. We will highlight the recent findings that have increased diagnostic yields such as the discovery of pathogenic somatic variants in novel genes, and new techniques that allow the discovery of somatic variants at much lower variant allele fractions. SUMMARY: A major focus will be on the emerging evidence that somatic mosaicism may contribute to some of the more common focal epilepsies such as temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis, which could lead to it being re-conceptualized as a genetic disorder.

Applying the ILAE diagnostic criteria for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in the real-world setting: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is an archetypal developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, for which novel treatments are emerging. Diagnostic criteria for LGS have recently been defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). We aimed to apply these criteria in a real-world setting. METHODS: We applied ILAE diagnostic criteria to a cohort of patients diagnosed with LGS by epileptologists following inpatient video-EEG monitoring (VEM) at tertiary comprehensive epilepsy centers between 1995 and 2015. We also assessed mortality in this cohort. RESULTS: Sixty patients diagnosed with LGS and had complete records available for review were identified. Among them, 29 (48%) patients met ILAE diagnostic criteria for LGS (ILAE-DC group). Thirty-one did not meet criteria (non-ILAE-DC) due to the absence of documented tonic seizures (n = 7), EEG features (n = 12), or both tonic seizures and EEG features (n = 10), intellectual disability (n = 1), or drug resistance (n = 1). The ILAE-DC group had a shorter duration of epilepsy at VEM than the non-ILAE-DC group (median = 12.0 years vs. 23.7 years, respectively; p = 0.015). The proportions of patients with multiple seizure types (100% vs. 96.7%), ≤2.5 Hz slow spike-and-wave EEG activity (100% vs. 90%), seizure-related injuries (27.6% vs. 25.8%), and mortality (standardized mortality ratio 4.60 vs. 5.12) were similar between the groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Up to 52% of patients diagnosed with LGS following VEM may not meet recently accepted ILAE criteria for LGS diagnosis. This may reflect both the limitations of retrospective medical record review and a historical tendency of applying the LGS diagnosis to a broad spectrum of severe, early-onset drug-resistant epilepsies with drop attacks. The ILAE criteria allow the delineation of LGS based on distinct electroclinical features, potentiating accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and management formulation. Nonetheless, mortality outcomes between those who did and did not meet ILAE diagnostic criteria for LGS were similarly poor, and both groups suffered high rates of seizure-related injury. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: More than half of patients diagnosed with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) at three Australian epilepsy monitoring units between 1995 and 2015 did not meet the recently devised International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) diagnostic criteria for LGS. Mortality was equally high in those who did and did not meet the ILAE diagnostic criteria, and seizure-related injury was common. The ILAE diagnostic criteria will guide accurate diagnosis, management, prognostication, and research in patients with LGS, however may be limited in their practical application to patients with a longer duration of epilepsy, or to those for whom detailed assessment is difficult.