Oncologic surveillance after surgical treatment for clinically localized kidney cancer: UroCCR study n. 129.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the EAU Guidelines implemented a novel, expert opinion-based follow-up scheme, with a three-risk-category system for clear cell (cc) and non-cc renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) after surgery with curative intent. We aimed to validate the novel follow-up scheme and provide data-driven recurrence estimates according to risk groups, to confirm or implement the oncologic surveillance strategy. METHODS: We identified 5,320 patients from a prospectively maintained database involving 28 French referral centers. The risk of recurrence, as either loco-regional or distant, was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method for each group (low- intermediate- or high-risk) according to ccRCC or non-ccRCC histology. The noncumulative distribution of recurrences was graphically investigated through the LOWESS smoother. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety-three (58%), 926 (23%), and 738 (19%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk ccRCC, and 683 (50%), 297 (22%), and 383 (28%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk non-ccRCC, respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 46 months. Overall, 661 patients experienced recurrence. Over time, the noncumulative risk of recurrence was approximately 10% for low-risk cc-RCC, non-ccRCC, and intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, with non-significant difference among the three recurrence functions (P=0.9). At 5-year, time point after which imaging should be de-intensified to biennial, the noncumulative risks of recurrence were: for intermediate risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 15% and 11%, respectively; for high-risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 24% and 8%, respectively. Among high-risk non-ccRCC patients there were 9 recurrences at 3-month. There was no significant difference between the recurrence function of high-risk non-ccRCC patients with negative imaging at 3-month and the one of intermediate-risk ccRCC (P=0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Given the relatively low recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, those individuals could be followed up with a similar strategy to the low-risk category. Similarly, patients with high-risk non-ccRCC with negative imaging at 3-month, could be followed up similarly to intermediate-risk ccRCC after the 3-month time point.

Feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has emerged as the gold standard for the management of adrenal diseases. Despite its low complication rate, the utilization of LA in outpatient settings remains limited. This study explored the feasibility of outpatient LA for primary aldosteronism (PA). DESIGN & METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted by reviewing the medical records of consecutive LA procedures performed for PA in our department from 2013 to 2021. A successful outpatient procedure was defined as same-day discharge, less than 12 hours after admission, with no readmission within 48 hours. A postoperative day one (D1) follow-up call by a nurse assessed complications, pain, and patient satisfaction (Numeric Rating Scale [0-10]). Follow-up visits were scheduled at one, three, and six months. RESULTS: During the study period, 76 LAs were performed for PA, with 60 (78.9%) being outpatient procedures. Sixteen patients (21.9%) were not selected for outpatient procedures. The main reasons for contraindicating outpatient procedures were anesthetic or social issues. The success rate of the outpatient procedures was 95% (57/60), with no reported surgical complications. Prolonged hospitalization occurred due to medical reasons such as pain or vomiting. There were no readmissions within 48 hours after discharge. The mean pain and patient satisfaction, evaluated at D1, were 2.1/10 and 9.4/10, respectively. At 6 months, 32 patients (59.2%) were cured without any antihypertensive drugs, and 15 (27.8%) were improved (reduction of their antihypertensive treatment). CONCLUSION: Outpatient LA for PA has demonstrated feasibility with a high success rate, no readmissions, low postoperative pain, and a high level of patient satisfaction.

An international consensus panel on the potential value of Digital Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of digital technology in surgery is increasing rapidly, with a wide array of new applications from presurgical planning to postsurgical performance assessment. Understanding the clinical and economic value of these technologies is vital for making appropriate health policy and purchasing decisions. We explore the potential value of digital technologies in surgery and produce expert consensus on how to assess this value. DESIGN: A modified Delphi and consensus conference approach was adopted. Delphi rounds were used to generate priority topics and consensus statements for discussion. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An international panel of 14 experts was assembled, representing relevant stakeholder groups: clinicians, health economists, health technology assessment experts, policy-makers and industry. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A scoping questionnaire was used to generate research questions to be answered. A second questionnaire was used to rate the importance of these research questions. A final questionnaire was used to generate statements for discussion during three consensus conferences. After discussion, the panel voted on their level of agreement from 1 to 9; where 1=strongly disagree and 9=strongly agree. Consensus was defined as a mean level of agreement of >7. RESULTS: Four priority topics were identified: (1) how data are used in digital surgery, (2) the existing evidence base for digital surgical technologies, (3) how digital technologies may assist surgical training and education and (4) methods for the assessment of these technologies. Seven consensus statements were generated and refined, with the final level of consensus ranging from 7.1 to 8.6. CONCLUSION: Potential benefits of digital technologies in surgery include reducing unwarranted variation in surgical practice, increasing access to surgery and reducing health inequalities. Assessments to consider the value of the entire surgical ecosystem holistically are critical, especially as many digital technologies are likely to interact simultaneously in the operating theatre.

[89Zr]Zr-girentuximab for PET-CT imaging of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: With limitations of conventional imaging and biopsy, accurate, non-invasive techniques to detect clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in patients with renal masses remain an unmet need. 89Zr-labelled monoclonal antibody ([89Zr]Zr-girentuximab) has high affinity for carbonic anhydrase 9, a tumour antigen highly expressed in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab PET-CT imaging for detection and characterisation of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: ZIRCON was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial conducted at 36 research hospitals and practices across nine countries (the USA, Australia, Canada, the UK, Türkiye, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and France). Patients aged 18 years or older with an indeterminate renal mass 7 cm or smaller (cT1) suspicious for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma and scheduled for nephrectomy received a single dose of [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab (37 MBq ±10%; 10 mg girentuximab) intravenously followed by abdominal PET-CT imaging 5 days (±2 days) later. Surgery was performed no later than 90 days after administration of [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab. Blinded central review, conducted by three independent readers, determined the histology from surgical samples. The coprimary endpoints, determined for each individual reader, were the sensitivity and specificity of [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab PET-CT imaging to detect clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, with histopathological confirmation as standard of truth. Analyses were on the full analysis set of patients, defined as patients who had evaluable PET-CT imaging and a confirmed histopathological diagnosis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03849118, and EUDRA Clinical Trials Register, 2018-002773-21, and is closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between Aug 14, 2019, and July 8, 2022, 371 patients were screened for eligibility, 332 of whom were enrolled. 300 patients received [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab (214 [71%] male and 86 [29%] female). 284 (95%) evaluable patients were included in the primary analysis. The mean sensitivity was 85·5% (95% CI 81·5-89·6) and mean specificity was 87·0% (81·0-93·1). No safety signals were observed. Most adverse events were not or were unlikely to be related to [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab, with most (193 [74%] of 261 events) occurring during or after surgery. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were post-procedural haemorrhage (in six [2%] of 261 patients), urinary retention (three [1%]), and hypertension (three [1%]). In 25 (8%) of 300 patients, 52 serious adverse events were reported, of which 51 (98%) occurred after surgery. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that [89Zr]Zr-girentuximab PET-CT has a favourable safety profile and is a highly accurate, non-invasive imaging modality for the detection and characterisation of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, which has the potential to be practice changing. FUNDING: Telix Pharmaceuticals.

Testicular Germ Cell Tumors with Venous Tumor Thrombus: Prevalence, Presentation, and Management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on the prevalence and management of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) cases presenting with venous tumor thrombus (VTT). Our objectives were to describe the prevalence of TGCT with VTT, to identify a multicenter retrospective cohort, and to ascertain expert opinion regarding optimal management of this entity. METHODS: Using the IBM Marketscan database, we identified men with testicular cancer who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) with concurrent VTT or inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombectomy to estimate the prevalence of VTT in TGCT. To identify a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients, we surveyed surgeons and described the presentation, management, and outcomes for the cohort. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The prevalence of TGCT with VTT in the IBM Marketscan database was 0.3% (n = 7/2517) when using stringent criteria and 3.1% (n = 79/2517) when using broad criteria. In response to our survey, 16 surgeons from ten centers contributed data for 34 patients. Most patients (n = 29, 85%) presented with nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Surgical management was used for 93.9% (n = 31), including postchemotherapy tumor thrombectomy with primary cavorrhaphy in 63%. The Marketscan analysis was limited to insured individuals and did not include clinicopathological details, and use of billing codes may have included patients with stromal tumors. In addition, lack of responses to the anonymous survey limited data capture, and the RedCap survey did not address symptoms specific to IVC obstruction or allow central review of the imaging leading to VTT diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: VTT among males with TGCT is rare and requires complex multidisciplinary management, including venous tumor thrombectomy at the time of postchemotherapy RPLND. PATIENT SUMMARY: Using a medical database, we estimated that the frequency of testicular cancer cases in which the tumor extends into a blood vessel (called venous tumor thrombus, VTT) is just 0.3-3.1%. We carried out a survey of surgeons with experience of this condition. Our results indicate that although testicular cancers respond well to chemotherapy, VTT is less responsive and complex surgery is necessary for this rare condition.

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar and Nonhilar Renal Masses: Comparison of Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Results in a Multicentre Prospective Cohort (NEPRAH Study, UroCCR 175).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A hilar location for a renal tumour is sometimes viewed as a limiting factor for safe partial nephrectomy. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar tumours (RAPN-H) in comparison to RAPN for nonhilar tumours (RAPN-NH). METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicentre cohort study using prospectively collected data from the French Research Network on Kidney Cancer (UroCCR). The registry includes data for 3551 patients who underwent RAPN for localised or locally advanced renal masses between 2010 and 2023 in 29 hospitals in France. We studied the impact of a hilar location on surgery, postoperative renal function, tumour characteristics, and survival. We also compared rates of trifecta achievement (warm ischaemia time [WIT] <25 min, negative surgical margins, and no perioperative complications) between the groups. Finally, we performed a subgroup analysis of RAPN without vascular clamping. Variables were compared in univariable analysis and using multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for relevant patient and tumour covariates. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The analytical population included 3451 patients, of whom 2773 underwent RAPN-NH and 678 underwent RAPN-H. Longer WIT (ß = 2.4 min; p < 0.01), longer operative time (ß = 11.4 min; p < 0.01) and a higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.33; p = 0.05) were observed in the hilar group. Blood loss, the perioperative transfusion rate, postoperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and trifecta achievement rates were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). At mean follow-up of 31.9 mo, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.2; p = 0.3), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.48-2.6; p = 0.79), or overall survival (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.53; p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient and tumour characteristics rather than just hilar location should be the main determinants of the optimal surgical strategy for hilar tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that kidney tumours located close to major kidney blood vessels led to a longer operation and a higher risk of complications during robot-assisted surgery to remove the tumour. However, tumours in these locations were not related to a higher risk of kidney function loss, cancer recurrence, or death.

Improving pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant waiting list between 2017 and 2021: assessment of a regional program in Aquitaine / Amélioration de l'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale entre 2017 et 2021 : bilan d'un programme régional en Aquitaine.

Introduction: Pre-emptive access to the kidney transplant (KT) waiting list remains limited in France, with only 3.9% of patients on pre-emptive KT and 5.6% of patients registered at the time of initiation of dialysis. A similar trend was observed in Aquitaine. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a regional program in terms of access to the waiting list for patients initiating a kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods: We included all patients assessed for registration on the list between 2017 and 2020, 2017 being the reference year and 2018 the beginning of the program. Using the CRISTAL and REIN registries, we assessed changes in the number of patients on the list at the time of initiation of dialysis or transplantation. Results: The number of new assessed candidates increased gradually each year from 255 in 2017 to 352 in 2020 (+38%). The number of patients on the list sharply increased in 2018 from 229 in 2017 to 319 in 2018 (+39.3%) and then remained stable. At the initiation of KRT, the proportion of patients registered on the waiting list increased gradually from 7.1% in 2017 to 18.2% in 2020. The proportion of pre-emptive KT remained stable between 2017 and 2021 (around 7%) with a decrease in 2020 (4.6%). Approximately 60% of patients had a contraindication to transplantation throughout the study. Conclusion: This study showed that a regional program aimed at providing better information to healthcare professionals and patients and encouraging rapid assessment of transplant candidates could increase the rate of pre-emptive registration on the KT waiting list for eligible patients over 4 years.

Introduction: L'accès préemptif à la liste d'attente de transplantation rénale (TR) reste limité en France, avec seulement 3,9 % de TR préemptives et 5,6 % de patients inscrits lors de l'initiation de la dialyse. Une tendance similaire était observée en Aquitaine. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'impact d'un programme régional en termes d'accès à la liste d'attente chez les patients débutant un traitement de suppléance. Méthodes: Nous avons inclus l'ensemble des patients évalués pour une inscription sur liste entre 2017 et 2020, 2017 étant l'année de référence et 2018 l'année de début du programme régional. Nous avons évalué de façon annuelle, grâce aux registres CRISTAL et REIN, l'évolution du nombre de patients inscrits sur liste lors de l'initiation du traitement de suppléance par dialyse ou transplantation. Résultats: Le nombre de nouveaux candidats évalués a augmenté graduellement chaque année, passant de 255 en 2017 à 352 en 2020 (+ 38 %). Le nombre de patients inscrits sur la liste a fortement augmenté en 2018 passant de 229 en 2017 à 319 en 2018 (+39,3 %), puis est resté stable. À l'initiation du traitement de suppléance, la proportion de patients inscrits a augmenté graduellement passant de 7,1 % en 2017 à 18,2 % en 2020. La proportion de TR préemptive est restée stable entre 2017 et 2021 (environ 7 %) avec une baisse en 2020 (4,6 %). Environ 60 % des patients présentaient une contre-­indication à la transplantation tout au long de cette étude. Conclusion: Cette étude a montré qu'un programme régional visant à mieux informer les professionnels de santé et les patients et favorisant l'évaluation rapide des candidats à la greffe permet d'augmenter en 4 ans le taux d'inscription préemptive sur liste d'attente de TR chez les patients éligibles.

Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR 43-Robese study).

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence on the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). In this study, we aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of RPN and OPN. METHODS: We relied on data from patients who underwent PN from 2009 to 2017 at 16 departments of urology participating in the UroCCR network, which were collected prospectively. In an effort to adjust for potential confounders, a propensity-score matching was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared between OPN and RPN patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 1277 obese patients (932 robotic and 345 open were included. After propensity score matching, 166 OPN and 166 RPN individuals were considered for the study purposes; no statistically significant difference among baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics was present. A higher overall complication rate and major complications rate were recorded in the OPN group (37 vs. 25%, p = 0.01 and 21 vs. 10%, p = 0.007; respectively). The length of stay was also significantly longer in the OPN group, before and after propensity-score matching (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in Warm ischemia time (p = 0.66), absolute change in eGFR (p = 0.45) and positive surgical margins (p = 0.12). At a median postoperative follow-up period of 24 (8-40) months, DFS and OS were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, RPN was associated with better perioperative outcomes (improvement of major complications rate and LOS) than OPN. The oncological outcomes were found to be similar between the two approaches.

Preparing for the Worst: Management and Predictive Factors of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Renal Tumor Surgery (UroCCR-135 Study).

Background and objective: Data regarding open conversion (OC) during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for renal tumors are reported from big databases, without precise description of the reason and management of OC. The objective of this study was to describe the rate, reasons, and perioperative outcomes of OC in a cohort of patients who underwent MIS for renal tumor initially. The secondary objective was to find the factors associated with OC. Methods: Between 2008 and 2022, of the 8566 patients included in the UroCCR project prospective database (NCT03293563), who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted minimally invasive partial (MIPN) or radical (MIRN) nephrectomy, 163 experienced OC. Each center was contacted to enlighten the context of OC: "emergency OC" implied an immediate life-threatening situation not reasonably manageable with MIS, otherwise "elective OC". To evaluate the predictive factors of OC, a 2:1 paired cohort on the UroCCR database was used. Key findings and limitations: The incidence rate of OC was 1.9% for all cases of MIS, 2.9% for MIRN, and 1.4% for MIPN. OC procedures were mostly elective (82.2%). The main reason for OC was a failure to progress due to anatomical difficulties (42.9%). Five patients (3.1%) died within 90 d after surgery. Increased body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.009) and cT stage (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.24-4.25, p = 0.008) were independent predictive factors of OC. Conclusions and clinical implications: In MIS for renal tumors, OC was a rare event (1.9%), caused by various situations, leading to impaired perioperative outcomes. Emergency OC occurred once every 300 procedures. Increased BMI and cT stage were independent predictive factors of OC. Patient summary: The incidence rate of open conversion (OC) in minimally invasive surgery for renal tumors is low. Only 20% of OC procedures occur in case of emergency, and others are caused by various situations. Increased body mass index and cT stage were independent predictive factors of OC.

The Impact of Histological Variants on Oncological Outcomes After Surgical Resection of a Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus: A Multi-institutional Study.

Background: There is no definitive evidence of the prognosis impact of histological variants (HVs) in patients who undergo surgical resection of a nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (nm-RCC) with venous tumor thrombus (TT). Objective: To investigate the impact of HVs on the prognosis of patients with nm-RCC with TT after radical surgery. Design setting and participants: Patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with the removal of the venous TT for an nm-RCC were included in a retrospective study. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Three groups were identified: clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), and chromophobe (chRCC) RCC. The primary outcome measures (disease-free and overall survival [OS]) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the impact of HVs on survival. Results and limitations: A total of 873 patients were included. The histological subtypes were distributed as follows: ccRCC in 780 cases, pRCC in 58 cases, and chRCC in 35 cases. At the time of data analysis, 612 patients were recurrence free and 228 had died. A survival analysis revealed significant differences in both OS and recurrence-free survival across histological subtypes, with the poorest outcomes observed in pRCC patients (p < 0.05). In a multivariable analysis, pRCC was independently associated with worse disease-free survival and OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71; p = 0.01 and HR: 1.24; p = 0.04), while chRCC was associated with more favorable outcomes than ccRCC (HR: 0.05; p < 0.001 and HR: 0.02; p < 0.001). A limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. Conclusions: In this multicentric series, HVs appeared to impact the medium-term oncological prognosis of kidney cancer with TT. Patient summary: This study investigated the differences in oncological outcomes among histological variants (clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe) in a cohort of nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with venous tumor thrombus extension. We observed that these histological variants within this specific subgroup exhibit distinct outcomes, with papillary renal cell carcinoma being associated with the worst prognosis.

UroPredict: Machine learning model on real-world data for prediction of kidney cancer recurrence (UroCCR-120).

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most often diagnosed at a localized stage, where surgery is the standard of care. Existing prognostic scores provide moderate predictive performance, leading to challenges in establishing follow-up recommendations after surgery and in selecting patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapy. In this study, we developed a model for individual postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) prediction using machine learning (ML) on real-world prospective data. Using the French kidney cancer research network database, UroCCR, we analyzed a cohort of surgically treated RCC patients. Participating sites were randomly assigned to either the training or testing cohort, and several ML models were trained on the training dataset. The predictive performance of the best ML model was then evaluated on the test dataset and compared with the usual risk scores. In total, 3372 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months. The best results in predicting DFS were achieved using Cox PH models that included 24 variables, resulting in an iAUC of 0.81 [IC95% 0.77-0.85]. The ML model surpassed the predictive performance of the most commonly used risk scores while handling incomplete data in predictors. Lastly, patients were stratified into four prognostic groups with good discrimination (iAUC = 0.79 [IC95% 0.74-0.83]). Our study suggests that applying ML to real-world prospective data from patients undergoing surgery for localized or locally advanced RCC can provide accurate individual DFS prediction, outperforming traditional prognostic scores.

Nephrometry scores to predict oncological outcomes following partial nephrectomy (UroCCR Study 70).

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy (PN) for large or complex renal tumors can be difficult and associated with a higher risk of recurrence than radical nephrectomy. We aim to evaluate the clinical useful of nephrometry scores for predicting oncological outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent PN for renal cell carcinomas. METHODS: Our analysis included patients who underwent PN for renal cell carcinoma in 21 French academic centers (2010-2020). RENAL, PADUA, and SPARE scores were calculated based on preoperative imaging. Uni- and multivariate cox models were performed to identify predictors of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify models with the highest discrimination. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) determined the net benefit associated with their use. RESULTS: A total of 1927 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 32 months (14-45). RENAL score (p = 0.01), age (p = 0.002), histological type (p = 0.001), high nuclear grade (p = 0.001), necrotic component (p < 0.001), and positive margins (p = 0.005) were significantly related to recurrence in multivariate analyses. The discriminative performance of the 3 radiological scores was modest (65, 63, and 63%, respectively). All 3 scores showed good calibration, which, however, deteriorated with time. Decision curve analysis of the three models for the prediction of overall and recurrence-free survival was similar for all three scores and of limited clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: The association between nephrometry scores and oncological outcomes after NP is very weak. The use of these scores for predicting oncological outcomes in routine practice is therefore of limited clinical value.

Percutaneous tumor ablation versus image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for cT1b renal cell carcinoma: a comparative matched-pair analysis (UroCCR 80).

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment for cT1b renal tumors. Percutaneous guided thermal ablation (TA) has proven oncologic efficacy with low morbidity for the treatment of small renal masses (<3 cm). Recently, 3D image-guided robot-assisted PN (3D-IGRAPN) has been described, and decreased perioperative morbidity compared to standard RAPN has been reported. Our objective was to compare two minimally invasive image-guided nephron-sparing procedures (TA vs. 3D-IGRAPN) for the treatment of cT1b renal cell carcinomas (4.1-7 cm). METHODS: Patients treated with TA and 3D-IGRAPN for cT1b renal cell carcinoma, prospectively included in the UroCCR database (NCT03293563), were pair-matched for tumor size, pathology, and RENAL score. The primary endpoint was the local recurrence rate between the two groups. Secondary endpoints included metastatic evolution, perioperative complications, decrease in renal function, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included and matched into two groups of 72 patients. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the TA group than that in the 3D-IGRAPN group (4.2% vs. 15.2%, P=0.04). Metastatic evolution and perioperative outcomes such as major complications, eGFR decrease, and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-IGRAPN resulted in a significantly lower local recurrence rate and comparable rates of complications and metastatic evolution compared with thermal ablation.

Can Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) Nephrometry scoring system help predict renal function outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? (UroCCR study 93).

BACKGROUND: The SPARE Nephrometry Score (NS) is described as easier to implement than the RENAL and PADUA NSs, currently more widely used. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of SPARE NS in predicting renal function outcomes following RAPN. METHODS: A multicentric retrospective study was conducted using French kidney cancer network (UroCCR, NCT03293563) database. All patients included had RAPN for cT1 renal tumors between May 2010 and March 2021. SPARE was compared to RENAL, PADUA and Tumor Size to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging, de novo CKD at 3-6 months follow-up and Trifecta failure. The ability of the different NSs and tumor size to predict renal function outcomes was evaluated using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: According to our study criteria, 1171 patients were included. Mean preoperative tumor size and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 3.4±1.4 cm and 85.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. In total, 266 (22.7%), 87 (7.4%), 94 (8%), and 624 (53.3%) patients had AKI, de novo CKD, CKD upstaging, and Trifecta failure, respectively. In multivariate analysis, all three NSs and tumor size were independent predictors of AKI, CKD de novo, CKD upgrade and Trifecta failure. There was no significant difference between all three NS and tumor sizes in predicting renal function outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SPARE Score seems to be a valid alternative to predict renal function outcomes after RAPN. Nevertheless, in our study, tumor size was as accurate as NSs in predicting postoperative outcomes and, therefore, seems to be the logical choice for surgical decisions.

A CT-Based Clinical, Radiological and Radiomic Machine Learning Model for Predicting Malignancy of Solid Renal Tumors (UroCCR-75).

BACKGROUND: Differentiating benign from malignant renal tumors is important for patient management, and it may be improved by quantitative CT features analysis including radiomic. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare performances of machine learning models using bio-clinical, conventional radiologic and 3D-radiomic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant solid renal tumors using pre-operative multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A unicentric retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a national kidney cancer database was conducted between January 2016 and December 2020. Histologic findings were obtained by robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Lesion images were semi-automatically segmented, allowing for a 3D-radiomic features extraction in the nephrographic phase. Conventional radiologic parameters such as shape, content and enhancement were combined in the analysis. Biological and clinical features were obtained from the national database. Eight machine learning (ML) models were trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation. Predictive performances were evaluated comparing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients with 132 renal lesions, including 111 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (111/132, 84%) and 21 benign tumors (21/132, 16%), were evaluated (58 +/- 14 years, men 74%). Unilaterality (100/111, 90% vs. 13/21, 62%; p = 0.02), necrosis (81/111, 73% vs. 8/21, 38%; p = 0.02), lower values of tumor/cortex ratio at portal time (0.61 vs. 0.74, p = 0.01) and higher variation of tumor/cortex ratio between arterial and portal times (0.22 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) were associated with malignancy. A total of 35 radiomics features were selected, and "intensity mean value" was associated with RCCs in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.99). After ten-fold cross-validation, a C5.0Tree model was retained for its predictive performances, yielding a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 42%, accuracy of 87% and AUC of 0.74. CONCLUSION: Our machine learning-based model combining clinical, radiologic and radiomics features from multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT scans may help differentiate benign from malignant solid renal tumors.

Retroperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter propensity-score matching analysis (PADORA Study - UroCCR n° 68).

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. This study aimed to compare the rate of trifecta achievement between retroperitoneal (RRPN) and transperitoneal (TRPN) robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using a large multicenter prospectively-maintained database and propensity-score matching analysis. METHODS: This study was launched by the French Kidney Cancer Research Network, under the UroCCR Project (NCT03293563). Patients who underwent TRPN or RRPN by experienced surgeons in 15 participating centers were included. Data on demographic and clinical parameters, tumor characteristics, renal function, and surgical parameters were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of trifecta achievement, which was defined as a warm ischemia time of less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins, and no major complications. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital length-of-stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, postoperative renal function, and each trifecta item taken alone. Subgroup analysis was done according to tumor location. RESULTS: A total of 2879 patients (2581 TRPN vs. 298 RRPN) were included in the study. Before matching, trifecta was achieved in 73.0% of the patients in the TRPN group compared to 77.5% in the RRPN group (P=0.094). After matching 157 patients who underwent TRPN to 157 patients who underwent RRPN, the trifecta rate was 82.8% in the TRPN group vs. 84.0% in the RRPN group (P=0.065). The RRPN group showed shorter operative time (123 vs. 171 min; P<0.001) and less blood loss (161 vs. 293 mL; P<0.001). RRPN showed a higher trifecta achievement for posterior tumors than TRPN (71% vs. 81%; P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: RRPN is a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach, particularly for posterior renal tumors, and is a safe and effective option for partial nephrectomy.

Clinical trial protocol for P-NeLoP: a randomized controlled trial comparing the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with low insufflation pressure using AirSeal versus standard insufflation pressure (UroCCR no. 85 study).

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the standard of care for small, localized kidney tumors. This surgery is conducted within a short hospital stay and can even be performed as outpatient surgery in selected patients. In order to allow early rehabilitation of patients, an optimal control of postoperative pain is necessary. High-pressure pneumoperitoneum during surgery seems to be the source of significant pain during the first hours postoperatively. Our study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study which aims to compare post-operative pain at 24 h between patients undergoing RAPN at low insufflation pressure (7 mmHg) and those operated on at standard pressure (12 mmHg) using the AirSeal system.This trial is registered in the US National Library of Medicine Trial Registry (NCT number: NCT05404685).

Minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatments for T1 renal cell cancer in patients over 75 years: a comparison of outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation.

PURPOSE: To compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) for treatment of T1 renal cell cancer (RCC) in patients older than 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective national multicenter study included all patients older than 75 years treated for a T1 RCC by RPN or PTA between January 2010 and January 2021. Patients' characteristics, tumor data, and perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients for 209 procedures (143 RPN and 66 PTA) were included. In the PTA group, patients were older (80.4 ± 3.7 vs. 79 ± 3.7 years (p = 0.01)); frailer (ASA score (2.43 ± 0.6 vs. 2.17 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01)); and more frequently had a history of kidney surgery (16.7% [11/66] vs. 5.6% [8/143] (p = 0.01)) than in the RPN group. Tumors were larger in the RPN group (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.9 cm (p < 0.01)). Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in RPN (respectively 92.1 ± 42.7 vs. 150.7 ± 61.3 min (p < 0.01); 1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 4.2 ± 3.4 days (p < 0.01); 1.9 ± 19.3% vs. 10.1 ± 23.7 (p = 0.03)). Disease-free survival and time to progression were similar (respectively, HR 2.2; 95% CI 0.88-5.5; p = 0.09; HR 2.1; 95% CI 0.86-5.2; p = 0.1). Overall survival was shorter for PTA that disappeared after Cox adjusting model (HR 3.3; 95% CI 0.87-12.72; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Similar oncological outcomes are observed after PTA and RPN for T1 RCC in elderly patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous thermal ablation have similar oncological outcomes for T1a kidney cancer in patients over 75 years; however, operative time, decrease in renal function, and length of hospital stay were lower with ablation. KEY POINTS: • After adjusting model for age and ASA score, similar oncological outcomes are observed after percutaneous thermal ablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell cancer in elderly patients. • Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy group.

Post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumors: safety and perioperative outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and early oncologic outcomes after post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RARPLND) for metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients from four tertiary centers who underwent PC-RARPLND for mGCT, from 2011 to 2021. Previous treatment of mGCT, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and early oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 66 patients were included. The majority of patients had non-seminoma mTGCT (89%). Median size of retroperitoneal lymph node (RLN) before surgery was 26 mm. Templates of PC-RARPLND were left modified, right modified, and full bilateral in 56%, 27%, and 14%, respectively. Median estimated blood loss and length of stay were 50 mL [50-150] and 2 [1-3] days. Four patients (6.1%) had a vascular injury, only one with significant blood loss and conversion to open surgery (OS). Two other patients had a conversion to OS for difficulty of dissection. No patient had transfusion, most frequent complications were ileus (10.6%) and symptomatic lymphorrea (7.6%) and no complications grade IIIb or more occurred. With a median follow-up of 16 months, two patients had a relapse, all outside of the surgical template (one in the retrocrural space with reascending markers, one in lungs). CONCLUSION: PC-RARPLND is a challenging surgery. In expert centers and for selected patients, it seemed safe and feasible, with a low morbidity. Further prospective evaluation of this procedure and long-term oncologic results are needed.