Effect of Prior Treatment With Fingolimod on Early and Late Response to Rituximab/Ocrelizumab in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Real-life studies noted that the risk of disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) after switching to rituximab (RTX) or ocrelizumab (OCR) may be unequal depending on prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT), with a higher risk associated with fingolimod (FING). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a structured prospective data collection including all consecutive patients with relapsing MS who were prescribed RTX/OCR in the MS center of Marseille. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to clinical and MRI outcomes. RESULTS: We included 321 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up of 3.5 years (1.5-5) after RTX/OCR initiation. At the first RTX/OCR infusion, the mean (SD) age of patients was 37 (10) years, and the median (IQR) disease duration was 8 years (3-15): 68 patients did not receive treatment before RTX/OCR and 108 switched from FING, 47 from low efficacy therapy, and 98 from natalizumab. For statistical analysis, the group "FING" was divided into "short-FING" and "long-FING" groups according to the median value of the group's washout period (27 days). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, for only the "long-FING" group, the risk of relapse within the first 6 months of RTX/OCR was increased as compared with patients without previous DMT (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.78; 95% CI 1.72-44.86; p < 0.01). Previous DMT and washout period duration of FING had no effect on B-cell levels at 6 months. Beyond the first 6 months of RTX/OCR, age <40 years was associated with increased risk of relapse (HR: 3.93; 95% CI 1.30-11.89; p = 0.01), male sex with increased risk of new T2 lesions (HR: 2.26; 95% CI 1.08-4.74; p = 0.03), and EDSS ≥2 with increased risk of disability accumulation (HR: 3.01; 95% CI 1.34-6.74; p < 0.01). Previous DMT had no effect on the effectiveness of RTX/OCR beyond 6 months after initiation. DISCUSSION: For patients switching from FING to RTX/OCR, the risk of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of treatment was increased as compared with patients with other DMT or no previous DMT only when the washout period exceeded 26 days. Neither FING nor other previous DMT reduced the effectiveness of RTX/OCR beyond the first 6 months of treatment.

Low-dose erythromycin in pediatrics: Formulation and stability of 20 mg hard gelatin capsules.

OBJECTIVE: Erythromycin is a macrolide antibiotic that is also prescribed off-label in premature neonates as a prokinetic agent. There is no oral formulation with dosage and/or excipients adapted for these high-risk patients. METHODS: Clinical studies of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent were reviewed. Capsules of 20 milligrams of erythromycin were compounded with microcrystalline cellulose. Erythromycin capsules were analyzed using the chromatographic method described in the United States Pharmacopoeia which was found to be stability-indicating. The stability of 20 mg erythromycin capsules stored protected from light at room temperature was studied for one year. RESULTS: 20 mg erythromycin capsules have a beyond use date not lower than one year. CONCLUSION: 20 milligrams erythromycin capsules can be compounded in batches of 300 unities in hospital pharmacy with a beyond-use-date of one year at ambient temperature protected from light.

Pre-formulation and Stability Study of 20-mcg Clonidine Hydrochloride Pediatric Capsules.

OBJECTIVE: Clonidine hydrochloride is an antihypertensive, centrally acting α2 adrenergic agonist with various pediatric indications. For pediatric patients, 20-mcg clonidine hydrochloride capsules can be compounded from commercial tablets or from a pre-compounded titrated powder. These methods should be compared to ensure the best quality for the high-risk patients, and a beyond-use date should be established. METHODS: Eight experimental batches were made from commercial tablets and 8 were made from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)-based titrated powders. Quality controls were performed to determine the best compounding protocol. Stability study was conducted on capsules compounded with the best method. RESULTS: Of 8 batches manufactured from commercial tablets, 7 were compliant for both clonidine mean content and content uniformity, whereas 7 of 8 batches manufactured from titrated powders were not. A clonidine loss during compounding was evidenced by surface sampling analyses. Clonidine hydrochloride 20-mcg capsules' mean content remained higher than 90% of initial content for 1 year when stored at 25°C with 60% relative humidity and protected from light. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial tablets should be preferred to 1% clonidine hydrochloride and MCC titrated powder made from the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Twenty-microgram clonidine hydrochloride capsules made from commercial tablets are stable for 1 year when stored under managed ambient storage condition.

Stability Studies of Fludrocortisone Acetate Capsules and Fludrocortisone Acetate Titrated Powders (Powder Triturates).

Fludrocortisone acetate is a drug used to treat adrenal insufficiencies which can be prescribed to hospitalized or ambulatory pediatric patients at dosages not commercially available. For these patients, 10-µg fludrocortisone capsules are currently compounded from a pre-compounded titrated powder (powder triturate). Fludrocortisone stability studies were carried out to ensure a valid beyond-use date. First, a stability-indicating fludrocortisone acetate dosing method was validated. Then fludrocortisone acetate 10-µg capsules and 1% fludrocortisone acetate titrated powders (powder triturates) were realized. Finally, stability studies were performed. The fludrocortisone acetate titrated powders (powder triturates) were stable for one year at controlled ambient temperature and protected from light, whereas 10-µg fludrocortisone acetate capsules were stable for six months. One year after, even if the fludrocortisone content remained conformed, an increase in product degradation was noted. Our work allowed us to determine a six-month beyond-use date for fludrocortisone acetate titrated powder (powder triturate) with the three most commonly used excipients for capsule compounding. We also confirmed the sixmonth theoretical stability for capsules.

Beyond-Use Dates Assignment for Pharmaceutical Preparations: Example of Low-Dose Amiodarone Capsules.

Background: Beyond-use dates (BUDs) in compounding practice are assigned from stability studies. The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP 42 NF 37) suggested to assign a 6 months BUD for dry oral forms. A new pediatric formula of amiodarone capsules was implemented in our hospital, with 3 dosages (5 mg, 20 mg, and 50 mg). Objective: BUD of these new formulas had to be determined by stability study. Methods: The method for the determination of amiodarone content was validated to be stability indicating, and a stability study was performed. Different excipients commonly used for capsule compounding were compared. Results: We found that, with microcrystalline cellulose as excipient, 50 mg amiodarone capsules were stable for 1 year, whereas 5 mg and 20 mg capsules were not. This difference was studied, and lactose or mannitol were found to be better excipients for 5 mg amiodarone capsules, despite their potential side effects. A potential drug-excipient interaction between microcrystalline cellulose and amiodarone hydrochloride is described. Conclusion: Amiodarone hydrochloride/microcrystalline cellulose capsules have a BUD of 1 month for 5 mg capsules, 6 months for 20 mg, and 1 year for 50 mg.

Comparison of rituximab originator (MabThera®) to biosimilar (Truxima®) in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab's originator MabThera® or Rituxan® has demonstrated high efficacy in multiple sclerosis (MS). Because of the patent expiration, rituximab biosimilars have been developed. However, because a biosimilar is not the exact copy of the originator, the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar may significantly differ. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar Truxima® and the originator MabThera® in MS. METHODS: Consecutive MS patients receiving MabThera® or Truxima® were prospectively followed during 1 year after treatment introduction. Allocation to each treatment depended on the period of introduction and not the physician's choice. Lymphocyte count, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: In total, 105 and 40 patients received MabThera® and Truxima®, respectively. The two groups did not differ in baseline characteristics. Effect on CD19+ lymphocytes and disease activity were similar during follow-up. EDSS remained stable, with no difference between groups. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of the rituximab biosimilar Truxima® seem equivalent to the originator MabThera® in MS patients. Truxima® could represent a relatively cheap and safe therapeutic alternative to MabThera® and could improve access to highly efficient therapy for MS in low- or middle-income countries.

Do pharmacist-led medication reviews in hospitals help reduce hospital readmissions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the impact of in-hospital pharmacist-led medication reviews in paediatric and adult patients. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from the Medline and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they met the following criteria (without any language or date restrictions): design: randomized controlled trial; intervention: in-hospital pharmacist-led medication review (experimental group) vs. usual care (control group); participants: paediatric or adult population. The primary outcome was all-cause readmissions and/or emergency department (ED) visits at different time points. The secondary outcomes were all-cause readmissions, all-cause ED visits, drug-related readmissions, mortality, length of hospital stay, adherence and quality of life. We calculated the relative risk (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each study. We used fixed and/or random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: We systematically reviewed 19 randomized controlled trials (4805 participants). The readmission rates did not differ between the experimental group and the control group (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.89; 1.05, p = 0.470). The secondary outcomes did not differ between the two groups, except for in drug-related readmissions, which were lower in the experimental group (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14; 0.45, p < 0.001), and all-cause ED visits (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59; 0.85 p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The low-quality evidence in this analysis suggests an impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews on drug-related readmissions and all-cause ED visits. Few studies reported on adherence and quality of life. More high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews on patient-relevant outcomes, including adherence and quality of life.