Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(5): 348-352, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548389

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cystic echinococcosis is a zoonotic infection frequently involving the liver. Treatment options, including surgery, are decided based on the staging of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Ultrasound is the cornerstone for diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cystic echinococcosis. MRI can help to evaluate for cystobiliary complications and planning of the surgery. The two main surgical approaches for cystic echinococcosis include a radical approach, which entails a partial hepatectomy and total pericystectomy, and a conservative approach or endocystectomy. Recent data suggest a conservative approach is well tolerated with acceptable morbidity and no mortality. Recurrences in centers with experience are rare. Data on laparoscopic surgery is emerging, but long-term follow-up still needs to be improved. SUMMARY: Surgical treatment options should be carefully evaluated according to the cystic echinococcosis disease staging. A multidisciplinary approach, including diagnostic and interventional radiology, abdominal and liver surgery, and infectious diseases, results in better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Equinococosis Hepática , Equinococosis , Humanos , Equinococosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Equinococosis Hepática/cirugía , Equinococosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Equinococosis/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(4): 846-848, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36696625

RESUMEN

We describe a case of mpox characterized by a circularly distributed facial rash but no identified risk factors. Fomite transmission of monkeypox virus from contaminated linen at a massage spa was suspected. Clinicians should consider mpox in patients with consistent clinical syndromes, even in the absence of epidemiologic risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca , Mpox , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Massachusetts , Monkeypox virus , Síndrome
4.
J Clin Med ; 11(11)2022 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35683518

RESUMEN

While the relative efficacy of remdesivir as a therapeutic agent in selected patients with COVID-19 has been established, safety concerns have been raised regarding potential nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. Our main objective was to investigate the kidney- and liver-related safety outcomes in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir in a public hospital in New York. A propensity score-matched retrospective study was conducted in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from 1 June 2020 to 10 March 2021. A total of 927 patients were included in this study (remdesivir: 427, non-remdesivir: 500; women: 51.8%; median age 61 years; median BMI: 28.5 kg/m2). Matching without replacement yielded a cohort of 248 patients (124 in each group). In the matched cohort, the remdesivir group had a significantly lower rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) (12.1% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.042), a lower rate of acute liver injury (ALI) on the verge of statistical significance (7.3% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.067), and non-significantly lower death rate (13.7% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.593) compared to the non-remdesivir group. Multivariable analyses revealed that patients treated with remdesivir were found to be associated with a significantly lower likelihood for AKI (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24−0.67, p < 0.001), no association was found for ALI (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.35−1.30, p = 0.241), while a trend towards an association of patients treated with remdesivir with a lower likelihood for in-hospital death was observed (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.32−1.01, p = 0.053). In conclusion, no safety concerns with regards to renal and liver outcomes were raised in patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir. Instead, there were signals of possible nephroprotection and improved in-hospital mortality.

5.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(5): 447-454, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34267044

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is unprecedented movement of people across international borders and parasitic infections, previously restricted to endemic regions, are now encountered in nonendemic areas of the world. RECENT FINDINGS: Migrants may import parasitic infections acquired in their countries of origin. Increasingly, clinicians in nonendemic regions are faced with patients with neglected diseases such as Chagas disease, malaria and strongyloidiasis. There are gaps in knowledge among physicians in nonendemic regions, which lead to missed opportunities for preventive strategies and early treatment. Both primary care and infectious disease physicians should have a broad knowledge of common parasitic infections to improve health outcomes and decrease healthcare disparities through early identification and treatment of disease encountered in migrants. SUMMARY: Migrant health is still a young field in medicine; clinicians should be aware of diseases seen in migrants, and access both educational and clinical resources, including experts in tropical medicine, in order to reduce health disparities among migrants. Collaboration between primary care and infectious disease/tropical medicine experts should be strengthened.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Chagas , Enfermedades Parasitarias , Migrantes , Medicina Tropical , Humanos , Enfermedades Desatendidas
6.
J Clin Med ; 10(10)2021 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34068023

RESUMEN

Together, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma account for the most common non-infectious respiratory pathologies. Conflicting preliminary studies have shown varied effect for COPD and asthma as prognostic factors for mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to explore the association of COPD and asthma with in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 by systematically reviewing and synthesizing with a meta-analysis the available observational studies. MEDLINE, Scopus, and medRxiv databases were reviewed. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used, and I-square was utilized to assess for heterogeneity. In-hospital mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were performed. Thirty studies with 21,309 patients were included in this meta-analysis (1465 with COPD and 633 with asthma). Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with COPD had higher risk of death compared to those without COPD (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.79-2.93; I2 59.6%). No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was seen in patients with and without asthma (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.68-1.10; I2 0.0%). The likelihood of death was significantly higher in patients with COPD that were hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to patients without COPD. Further studies are needed to assess whether this association is independent or not. No significant difference was demonstrated in COVID-19-related mortality between patients with and without asthma.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA