RESUMEN
The objective of this study is to characterize changes in rape myth acceptance (RMA) among college students from 2010 to 2017. Two samples of undergraduates in a northeastern university in the United States participated in the study, consisting of 464 students in the fall semester of 2010 and 534 students in the spring semester of 2017. Participants took an anonymous web-based survey to measure levels of RMA. The instrument was a revised and updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale. Data analysis was both descriptive and inferential. For all subscales and the overall total RMA, differences in scores by year of survey (2017 compared with 2010) were significant; 2017 scores were significantly lower than 2010 scores. The greatest differences were for the She asked for it and She lied subscales, 1.76 versus 2.62 (p < .001) and 2.26 versus 2.69 (p < .001), respectively. In both years, male students and younger students were significantly more likely to endorse rape myths. RMA among undergraduates at one northeastern university has lessened since 2010.
Asunto(s)
Violación , Femenino , Humanos , Illinois , Masculino , Estudiantes , Estados Unidos , UniversidadesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Survival time in HIV/AIDS patients has increased as a result of improved treatments, but many acquire functional impairments that may necessitate multidisciplinary medical rehabilitation. In the United States, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) provide this care, but outcomes are not well described in this population. We used the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR) database to describe 11,051 HIV/AIDS IRF patients; HIV/AIDS patients were grouped according to the following admission criteria: (1) HIV/AIDS as primary reason for admission (n = 225); (2) HIV/AIDS symptomatic comorbidity (n = 6569); and (3) HIV/AIDS asymptomatic comorbidity (n = 4257). We used standard descriptive statistics to summarize demographic, medical, rehabilitation, and discharge setting characteristics by group. When compared to patients with HIV/AIDS as a comorbidity, primary HIV/AIDS patients had worse outcomes. They made less functional change (25.1 versus 29.8 and 28.9, p < .001), went home less (73.8% versus 74.5% and 77.8%, p < .001) and to an acute care hospital more frequently (18.2% versus 13.9% and 10.1%, p < .001). These findings help to characterize the HIV/AIDS patient population who receive inpatient medical rehabilitation, which helps inform clinical care, and highlight the positive impact IRF care can make to minimize functional disability among chronic HIV/AIDS patients and possibly decrease costs of home health care.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Pacientes Internos , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por VIH/rehabilitación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Recuperación de la Función , Centros de Rehabilitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To explore awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) and use of HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) by college students. PARTICIPANTS: The sample was composed of 817 undergraduates at 2 northeastern US universities; they participated between February and May 2010. METHODS: Students were provided with a link to an anonymous, self-administered, Web-based survey comprised of 76 questions. The survey included questions about health behaviors, awareness, and knowledge of HPV and the 2 HPV vaccines, and vaccine uptake. RESULTS: Results indicate high levels of awareness of HPV as well as marked sex differences related to vaccine awareness and uptake. Both sexes are largely unaware of Cervarix and the differences between Cervarix and Gardasil. CONCLUSION: The study affirms the importance of a clinician's recommendation for HPV vaccination. Public health messaging should become more inclusive of adolescent and young adult males. College students' awareness of HPV vaccine options mirrors Gardasil's market dominance in the United States.