Elevated Urinary Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 Detects Underlying Renal Allograft Inflammation and Injury.

BACKGROUND: The urinary CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)10 detects renal transplant inflammation noninvasively, but has limited sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we performed urinary proteomic analysis to identify novel biomarkers that may improve the diagnostic performance of urinary CXCL10 for detecting alloimmune inflammation in renal transplant patients. METHODS: In preliminary studies, adult renal transplant patients with normal histology (n = 5), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (n = 6), subclinical (n = 6) and clinical rejection (n = 6), underwent in-depth urine protein compositional analysis with LC-MS/MS, and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) were identified as a potential candidate for the diagnosis of renal allograft inflammation. Urine MMP7 performance was then studied in a larger, prospective adult renal transplant population (n = 148 urines from n = 133 patients) with matched surveillance/indication biopsies. The diagnostic performance of urinary MMP7 and CXCL10 in combination was next evaluated using concordance (C-) statistics, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement indices, to determine whether it was better than CXCL10 alone. RESULTS: Urinary MMP7:creatinine (Cr) was lower in normal transplants compared to those with inflammation: glomerulonephritis (P = 0.009), viral nephropathies (P = 0.002), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and inflammation (P = 0.04), borderline (P = 0.08), subclinical (P = 0.01) and clinical rejection (P = 0.0006), and acute tubular necrosis (P < 0.0001). Urinary MMP7:Cr and CXCL10:Cr significantly distinguished noninflamed from inflamed biopsies (area under the curve, 0.74 and 0.70, respectively). The addition of urinary MMP7:Cr to CXCL10:Cr improved the diagnostic performance for subclinical and clinical inflammation/injury by integrated discrimination improvement (P = 0.002) and net reclassification improvement (P = 0.006) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary MMP7:Cr improves the overall diagnostic performance of urinary CXCL10:Cr for distinguishing normal histology from subclinical and clinical inflammation/injury, but not subclinical inflammation alone.

Urinary hepcidin-25 and risk of acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) complicating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in increased morbidity and mortality. Urinary hepcidin-25 has been shown to be elevated in patients who do not develop AKI after CPB using semiquantitative mass spectrometry (SELDI TOF-MS). The goals of this study were to quantitatively validate these findings with ELISA and evaluate the diagnostic performance of hepcidin-25 for AKI. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested, case-control analysis of urinary hepcidin-25 in AKI (n = 22) and non-AKI (n = 22) patients was conducted to validate the SELDI TOF-MS data at the following times: preoperatively; the start of CPB; 1 hour on CPB; on arrival to the intensive care unit; and postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 to 5. The diagnostic performance of hepcidin-25 was then evaluated in the entire prospective observational cohort (n = 338) at POD 1. AKI was defined as Cr >50% from baseline, within 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Urinary hepcidin-25/Cr ratio was significantly elevated in all patients at POD 1 compared with baseline (P < 0.0005) and was also significantly elevated in non-AKI versus AKI patients at POD 1 (P < 0.0005). Increased log(10) hepcidin-25/Cr ratio was strongly associated with avoidance of AKI on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the log(10) hepcidin-25/Cr ratio (P < 0.0001) was associated with avoidance of AKI with an area under the curve of 0.80, sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.68, and negative predictive value 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated urinary hepcidin-25 on POD 1 is a strong predictor of avoidance of AKI beyond postoperative day 1.

Validation of urinary CXCL10 as a marker of borderline, subclinical, and clinical tubulitis.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft injury secondary to subclinical and clinical tubulitis remains an important cause of allograft fibrosis and loss despite modern immunosuppression. The goal of this study was to validate the previously reported use of urinary CXCL10 (interferon-γ-induced protein of 10 kDa) as a noninvasive marker of tubulitis in an independent clinical cohort. METHODS: Urine samples (n=102) from 91 patients with protocol or indication biopsies were assayed for urinary CXCL10 using ELISA. The groups analyzed were as follows: normal histology (n=22); interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) (n=20); IFTA and borderline tubulitis (n=13); borderline (n=13), subclinical (n=17); and clinical tubulitis (n=17) without IFTA. RESULTS: The ratio of urinary CXCL10 to creatinine (CXCL10: Cr) was found to distinguish borderline, subclinical and clinical tubulitis from normal histology, and IFTA. The area under the curve receiver operating characteristic curve to distinguish normal versus borderline and subclinical tubulitis was 0.845 (OR 1.407, P=0.0184); normal versus borderline, subclinical and clinical tubulitis was 0.835 (OR 1.400, P=0.0127). CXCL10: Cr demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 72.7% for normal versus borderline and subclinical tubulitis at a cut-off of 1.97 ng CXCL10/mmol Cr. CONCLUSION: This study validates urinary CXCL10 as a noninvasive, sensitive, and specific marker for tubulitis in an independent cohort. The straightforward urine processing is accessible to clinical laboratories. We propose that CXCL10 may be useful as a supplementary noninvasive screening test for tubulitis in renal transplant patients, with a level more than 1.97 ng CXCL10/mmol Cr being a threshold to consider biopsy.

Early urinary CCL2 is associated with the later development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft injury resulting in progressive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is a leading cause of graft loss. The goal of this study was to identify early urinary predictors for the subsequent development of IFTA in a prospective cohort of patients (n=111) who underwent serial protocol biopsies at 0, 6, and 24 months. METHODS: The urinary proteins evaluated were CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, and alpha1-microglobulin (alpha1M) using ELISA and immunonephelometry. RESULTS: We first evaluated urines obtained at 1 to 3 months and found that alpha1M and CXCL10 were associated with IFTA at 6 months but not at 24 months. Next, we evaluated urines at 6 months and found that CCL2 was associated with both IFTA and graft dysfunction at 24 months. On univariate analysis, 6-month urinary CCL2 was a risk factor for developing 24-month IFTA, defined as ci+ct score more than 0 (odds ratio 1.045, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.084, P=0.028). Furthermore, CCL2 remained an independent predictor of IFTA on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 1.049, 95% confidence interval: 1.006-1.094, P=0.024) when adjusted for donor age, delayed graft function, deceased donation, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker exposure. In comparison, alpha1M, CXCL9, and CXCL10 were not associated with late graft outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that early urinary CCL2 is an independent predictor for the subsequent development of IFTA at 24 months.

Detection of subclinical tubular injury after renal transplantation: comparison of urine protein analysis with allograft histopathology.

BACKGROUND: Tubulointerstitial injury due to rejection leads to tubular atrophy (TA)/interstitial fibrosis (IF) followed by deterioration of allograft function. This study investigated whether urinary tubular injury biomarkers can detect subclinical tubulitis found in protocol biopsies allowing for a noninvasive screening procedure. METHODS: Four rigidly defined groups (stable transplants with normal tubular histology [n=24], stable transplants with subclinical tubulitis [n=38], patients with clinical tubulitis Ia/Ib [n=18], and patients with other clinical tubular pathologies [n=20]) were compared for differences in urinary intact/cleaved beta2-microglobulin (i/cbeta2m), retinol-binding protein (RBP), neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and alpha1-microglobulin (alpha1m). RESULTS: Tubular proteinuria was present in 38% (RBP) to 79% (alpha1m) of patients in the stable transplant with normal tubular histology group. The stable transplant with subclinical tubulitis group had slightly higher levels of i/cbeta2m (P=0.11), RBP (P=0.17), alpha1m (P=0.09), and NGAL (P=0.06) than the stable transplant with normal tubular histology group with a substantial overlap. The clinical tubulitis Ia/Ib and the other clinical tubular pathology groups had significantly higher levels of RBP, NGAL, and alpha1m than stable transplants with normal tubular histology or stable transplants with subclinical tubulitis (P<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: None of the investigated biomarkers allow for clear differentiation between stable transplants with normal tubular histology and stable transplants with subclinical tubulitis. Therefore, the protocol allograft biopsy currently remains the preferred tool to screen for subclinical tubulitis. Further longitudinal studies should determine whether tubular proteinuria in stable transplants with normal tubular histology indicates a clear risk for early development of TA/IF.