Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 18(3): 612-616, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35900530

RESUMEN

Context: The submandibular glands (SMGs) excision during head-and-neck oncosurgeries lead to significant morbidity and degradation of quality of life (QOL). The preservation of SMGs during head-and-neck oncosurgeries, without affecting oncological safety, will improve QOL by preventing xerostomia in these patients. Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the involvement of SMG by malignancy during neck dissection being done for the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of tongue and to evaluate oncological safety of SMG preservation in SCC of the tongue. Settings and Design: The study design was a retrospective analytical study. Subjects and Methods: The study included 391 patients of SCC of tongue operated at Quaternary oncological center from January 2016 to February 2020. The treatment records of 371 patients were reviewed for demographical data, nodal metastasis, and histopathological involvement of SMG by SCC. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22. Results: A total of 555 necks dissected were assessed, out of which 95 necks dissected were positive for nodal metastasis at level Ib. The SMG was involved by SCC in only two cases, both of which were poorly differentiated SCC. No intraglandular lymph nodes were detected in any of the SMG dissected. Conclusions: The study showed that involvement of the SMG by SCC of the tongue is not very common, and it may be possible to preserve the SMG during neck dissection in selected cases in SCC of the tongue. The preservation will definitely improve QOL of the patients, as excision of the SMG is one of the prominent factors, resulting in xerostomia.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de la Boca , Xerostomía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Disección del Cuello/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glándula Submandibular/patología , Glándula Submandibular/cirugía , Lengua/patología , Xerostomía/patología
2.
South Asian J Cancer ; 10(3): 167-171, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34938679

RESUMEN

Context Tumors of parapharyngeal space (PPS) are rare and histologically diverse. The management of these tumors requires diligent assessment and planning with due consideration of various anatomical and pathological aspects of the lesion. Aims This retrospective study aims to present our experiences in the clinical and pathological aspects of PPS tumors with a critical evaluation of management. Settings and Design Retrospective analytical study. Methods and Material The electronic medical records of 60 cases of PPS tumors, managed surgically from 2007 to 2017, were reviewed and analyzed using SPSS 22 software. The mean follow-up duration was 44 months. Results The mean age was 45 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7 (38:22). The majority of the tumors were benign (71.7%) and the most common presentation being upper neck mass or oropharyngeal mass. Histologically, neurogenic tumors were most common (43.3%) PPS tumors, followed by tumors of salivary gland origin. Magnetic resonance imaging was used as a diagnostic modality in 70% of cases, and computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography/CT were used in 26.7 and 3.3% of cases, respectively. In our study, the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology was 71% for benign and 47% for malignant lesions. The most common approach for surgery used was transcervical (72%). Conclusion The study reveals that cranial nerve palsy is the most common complication associated with PPS tumors. Completely resected, malignant tumors originating within PPS have a good prognosis, as compared with tumors extending or metastasized to PPS.

3.
Rambam Maimonides Med J ; 12(3)2021 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270403

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to retrospectively review clinical data, management protocols, and clinical outcomes of patients with fibromatoses of head and neck region treated at our tertiary care center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients with confirmed histopathological diagnosis of fibromatosis registered in the Department of Head and Neck Surgery at Tata Memorial Centre, India, between 2009 and 2019. Various clinical and pathological features and treatment modalities were evaluated. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis ranged between 18 and 74 years, with a median age of 36 years. The female-to-male ratio was 5:6. Supraclavicular fossa (n=4) was the most common subsite of origin in the neck (n=8). The lateral (n=2) and posterior cervical regions (n=2) were other common neck subsites. Less commonly involved sites were the mandible (n=1), maxilla (n=1), and thyroid (n=1). A total of eight patients underwent surgery at other centers before being referred to us for further management. Out of a total 11 patients, nine patients had unresectable disease at presentation. Six of the patients with unresectable disease received a combination of weekly doses of vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and methotrexate 30 mg/m2 for a median duration of 6 months (range 6-18 months) followed by hormonal therapy with tamoxifen. Three patients received metronomic chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy. One treatment-naive patient with fibromatosis of posterior cervical (suboccipital) region underwent R2 resection (excision of bulk of the tumor with preservation of critical structures) at our center along with adjuvant radiotherapy. One pregnant patient reported to us after undergoing surgery outside and defaulting radiotherapy. During median follow-up of 29 months (range 1-77 months), six patients had stable disease, and four patients had disease reduction. Disease progression was seen in one patient. The two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 90% (95% CI 70%-100%). CONCLUSION: Gross residual resection (R2) was the mainstay of surgical treatment in our series, as obtaining clear surgical margins is seldom possible in these locally aggressive tumors. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy are the other preferred and more conservative treatment modalities. The goal of surgery should be preserving function with minimal or no morbidity. As fibromatoses in the head and neck region are extremely rare, their treatment awaits the development of standard treatment protocols.

4.
Cancer ; 127(10): 1576-1589, 2021 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405231

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common head and neck malignancy. Although the survival rate of patients with advanced-stage disease remains approximately 20% to 60%, when detected at an early stage, the survival rate approaches 80%, posing a pressing need for a well validated profiling method to assess patients who have a high risk of developing OCSCC. Tumor DNA detection in saliva may provide a robust biomarker platform that overcomes the limitations of current diagnostic tests. However, there is no routine saliva-based screening method for patients with OCSCC. METHODS: The authors designed a custom next-generation sequencing panel with unique molecular identifiers that covers coding regions of 7 frequently mutated genes in OCSCC and applied it on DNA extracted from 121 treatment-naive OCSCC tumors and matched preoperative saliva specimens. RESULTS: By using stringent variant-calling criteria, mutations were detected in 106 tumors, consistent with a predicted detection rate ≥88%. Moreover, mutations identified in primary malignancies were also detected in 93% of saliva samples. To ensure that variants are not errors resulting in false-positive calls, a multistep analytical validation of this approach was performed: 1) re-sequencing of 46 saliva samples confirmed 88% of somatic variants; 2) no functionally relevant mutations were detected in saliva samples from 11 healthy individuals without a history of tobacco or alcohol; and 3) using a panel of 7 synthetic loci across 8 sequencing runs, it was confirmed that the platform developed is reproducible and provides sensitivity on par with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The current data highlight the feasibility of somatic mutation identification in driver genes in saliva collected at the time of OCSCC diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , ADN de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Boca , Saliva , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Boca/genética , Mutación
5.
South Asian J Cancer ; 9(1): 34-37, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor for oral cancers (oral squamous cell carcinoma [OSCC]). The correlation of margin with the type of reconstruction has never been studied. AIM: This study aimed to correlate surgical margins with the type of reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 410 treatment-naïve OSCC patients. As per the methods of reconstruction, three groups were made when reconstruction was performed using pedicled flap (PF) or local flap, free flap, and primary closure (PC). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test was used for comparison of margin status as per the method of reconstruction. Mann-Whitney test was used to find the difference between the mean margin width with respect to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: The overall incidence of close/positive margins was 7.8%. The incidence of close/positive margins was not significantly different in free flap group compared to PF (P = 0.06) or PC (P = 0.835) group. However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of close/positive margins between PC and PF groups (P = 0.021). Whether the reconstruction is performed by the primary surgeon or by a another surgeon, it did not have an impact on adequacy of margins (P = 0.334). Margins were wider when the reconstruction is performed by a different team (P = 0.015) or when reconstruction is performed as compared to PC. CONCLUSION: Margins are not affected by the type of reconstruction (pedicled vs. free flap) and the team doing reconstruction (same vs. another team). Margins are significantly compromised when a surgeon performs PC himself/herself compared to PF.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA