RESUMEN
This study aimed to explore the feasibility of Phase I percutaneous spinal endoscopy with a 270° single incision in the ventral and dorsal dura mater for decompression treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS). Phase I percutaneous spinal endoscopy with a two-path (posterior and posterolateral approaches) single incision with a 270° decompression was performed in four cases of TSS with compression in the ventral and dorsal dura mater. The affected intervertebral space was located during the surgery, and the ossified ligamentum flavum in the ventral and dorsal dura mater was removed via laminectomy, which formed a decompression space in the thoracic cord. Next, posterolateral transforaminal expansion and plasty were performed to remove the ventral intervertebral disk. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, thoracic spinal cord function score of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) (11-point method), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. No dura mater or thoracic nerve injury occurred during the surgery. The symptoms of weakness in the lower extremities improved after the surgery. The postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography examinations showed compression removal and dura mater bulging. The postoperative VAS, JOA, and ODI scores improved compared with the preoperative scores. Two surgical trajectories, posterior and posterolateral approaches, were established by a single incision using thoracic spinal canal decompression with Phase I 270° single-incision percutaneous spinal endoscopy. The posterior approach was performed mainly by translaminar unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression in the ventral and dorsal dura mater, whereas the posterolateral approach was performed by decompression in the ventral dura mater to the midline of the vertebrae. This surgical method could be applied as a safe and feasible minimally invasive treatment for TSS with compression on both the ventral and dorsal dura mater.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Espinal , Enfermedades Torácicas , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Canal Medular , Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcorporeal percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (TcPECD) destroys the integrity of the vertebral body. We herein discuss its long-term risks and avoidance measures. Case presentation: A 44-year-old woman underwent TcPECD. Although her upper limb symptoms were relieved after the operation, the bone channel did not heal and the endplate of the segment was altered. She consequently developed chronic neck and shoulder discomfort. CONCLUSION: Careful preoperative planning is needed to avoid non-healing of the bone channel following TcPECD. The diameter of the bony channel should be as small as possible and the channel should be opened at the posterior edge of the upper endplate to avoid collapse.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Discectomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Adulto , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía Percutánea/métodos , Femenino , Fracturas no Consolidadas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/etiología , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Espondilosis/complicaciones , Espondilosis/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology was used to simulate the placement of the lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT), to determine the starting point and direction of the screw trajectory. METHODS: Between February 2017 and April 2018, 24 patients with lumbar CT were selected as the study object. There were 7 males and 17 females, with an average age of 50.4 years (range, 37-68 years). The CT DICOM data of patients were imported into Mimics 16.0 software, and the three-dimensional model of lumbar spine was established. A 5 mm diameter cylinder was set up to simulate the CBT by using Mimics 16.0 software. According to the different implant schemes, the study was divided into groups A, B, and C, the track of the screw respectively passed through the upper edge, the medial edge, and the lower edge of the isthmus of the pedicle. The intersection of simulated screw and lumbar spine was marked as region of interest (ROI) and a mask was generated. The average CT value [Hounsfield unit (HU)] and the screw length of ROI were automatically measured by Mimics 16.0 software. In addition, the head inclination angle and head camber angle of the screw were measured respectively. Point F was the intersection of the level of the lowest edge of the transverse process and the lumbar isthmus periphery. The horizontal and vertical distance between point F and the starting point were measured, and the relationship between the three schemes and the position of the zygapophysial joint and spinous process was observed. RESULTS: Plan A has the highest ROI average HU, with the maximum value appearing in L 4; plan B has the longest screw length, with the maximum value appearing in L 5; plan C has the largest nail track head inclination angle, with the maximum value appearing in L 4; plan B has the largest nail track head camber angle, with the maximum value appearing in L 3. The screw length and head camber angle of the nail in group B were significantly greater than those in groups A and C ( P<0.05); the head inclination angle in groups A, B, and C was gradually increased, showing significant differences ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the average HU value of ROI between the 3 groups ( P>0.05). In plan A, 74.48% (143/192) screws had a horizontal distance of -2 to 4 mm from point F, a vertical distance of 6-14 mm from point F, a head inclination angle of (14.64±2.77)°, and a head camber angle of (6.55±2.09)°, respectively; in plan B, 84.58% (203/240) screws had a horizontal distance of 1-6 mm from point F, a vertical distance of 1-5 mm from point F, a head inclination angle of (26.93±2.21)°, and a head camber angle of (10.29±2.46)°, respectively; in plan C, 85.94% (165/192) screws had a horizontal distance of -2 to 3 mm from point F, a vertical distance of -2 to 4 mm from point F, a head inclination angle of (33.50±3.69)°, and a head camber angle of (6.47±2.48)°, respectively. CONCLUSION: Plan B should be selected as the starting point of the L 1-L 5 CBT implant. It is located at the intersection of the lowest horizontal line of the transverse process root and the lateral edge of the lumbar isthmus, which is 1-6 mm horizontally inward, 1-5 mm vertically upward, with a head inclination angle of (26.93±2.21)°, and a head camber angle of (10.29±2.46)°, respectively.