Interpenetrating network ceramic-resin composite dental restorative materials.

OBJECTIVES: This paper investigates the structure and some properties of resin infiltrated ceramic network structure materials suitable for CAD/CAM dental restorative applications. METHODS: Initially the basis of interpenetrating network materials is defined along with placing them into a materials science perspective. This involves identifying potential advantages of such structures beyond that of the individual materials or simple mixing of the components. RESULTS: Observations from a number of recently published papers on this class of materials are summarized. These include the strength, fracture toughness, hardness and damage tolerance, namely to pointed and blunt (spherical) indentation as well as to burr adjustment. In addition a summary of recent results of crowns subjected to simulated clinical conditions using a chewing simulator are presented. These results are rationalized on the basis of existing theoretical considerations. SIGNIFICANCE: The currently available ceramic-resin IPN material for clinical application is softer, exhibits comparable strength and fracture toughness but with substantial R-curve behavior, has lower E modulus and is more damage tolerant than existing glass-ceramic materials. Chewing simulation observations with crowns of this material indicate that it appears to be more resistant to sliding/impact induced cracking although its overall contact induced breakage load is modest.

Success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth; a systematic review after 6 years.

The aims of this systematic review were to investigate the success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth and their manner of failure. PubMed and hand literature searches were conducted on studies published until June 2012. Only clinical studies on human subjects referring to the success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth with a follow-up period of at least 6 years were reviewed. A total of four studies were identified. Meta-analysis showed the success rate to be 92% (CI 82-98%) for single crowns on endodontically treated teeth and 79% (72-86%) for fixed dental prostheses. Only one study reported on removable dental prostheses with a success rate of 66%. Single crowns on teeth restored without posts demonstrated a success rate of 94% (CI 84-99%), whereas where posts were placed, the success rate was lower (92% CI 82-98%). Single crowns over cast post-and-cores and prefabricated posts showed success rates of 93% (CI 82-99%) and 94% (CI 90-97%), respectively; both differences were not statistically significant (significance level of 5%). The most common reason for failure was post-debonding. Single crowns seem to be the best treatment modality for endodontically treated teeth. However, due to the low number of studies included and their design, the results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution. Further clinical studies are needed to provide high-quality evidence on the topic.