A randomised comparison of C-MAC™ and King Vision® videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in 180 obstetric patients.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that there is uncertainty about which videolaryngoscope performs best in obstetric anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare C-MAC and King Vision® videolaryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation of patients undergoing caesarean section. METHODS: One hundred and eighty women were randomly assigned. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes were the time to the best laryngeal view, grade of Cormack and Lehane view, overall and first-pass success, intubation difficulty, the number of intubation attempts and optimisation manoeuvres; and complications. RESULTS: The time to successful intubation, first-pass and overall success rates did not differ between the devices. The difficulty of intubation was less for C-MAC than King Vision® (P <0.001). No difference was observed between King Vision® and direct laryngoscopy (P=0.06) or C-MAC and direct laryngoscopy (P=0.05). King Vision® required the longest time to best laryngeal view (9 ±â€¯6 s, P=0.028), had the highest rate of grade 1 view (47 (80%) patients, P <0.001), and the highest need for optimisation manoeuvres (59 (100%) patients, P <0.0001). Five minor complications were recorded with King Vision® and one with direct laryngoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to direct laryngoscopy, C-MAC and King Vision® did not prolong the time to intubation, supporting these videolaryngoscopes as primary intubation devices in obstetric anaesthesia. The C-MAC was easier to use and needed fewer additional manoeuvres than the King Vision®. The C-MAC may be better suited for tracheal intubation of obstetric patients undergoing caesarean section.

Impact of epidural analgesia on cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates classified by the Ten Groups Classification System.

BACKGROUND: The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) allows critical analysis according to the obstetric characteristics of women in labor: singleton or multiple pregnancy, nulliparous, multiparous, or multiparous with a previous cesarean delivery, cephalic, breech presentation or other malpresentation, spontaneous or induced labor, and term or preterm births. Labor outcomes associated with epidural analgesia may be different among the different labor classification groups. The aim of this study was to explore associations between epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery, and epidural analgesia and assisted vaginal delivery, in women classified using the TGCS. METHODS: Slovenian National Perinatal Information System data for the period 2007-2014 were analyzed. All women after spontaneous onset or induction of labor were classified according to the TGCS, within which cesarean and vaginal assisted delivery rates were investigated (P <0.003 significant). RESULTS: Data on 207 525 deliveries (and 211 197 neonates) were analyzed. In most TGCS groups women with epidural analgesia had lower cesarean delivery rates. Women in group 1 (nulliparous term women with singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation in spontaneous labor) with epidural analgesia had a higher cesarean delivery rate. In most TGCS groups women with epidural analgesia had higher assisted vaginal delivery rates. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia is associated with different effects on cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal delivery rates in different TGCS groups.