Definitions of resilience and resilience resource use as described by adults with congenital heart disease.

Background: Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) is a lifelong illness that presents ongoing challenges to quality of life. Fostering personal resilience resources to sustain well-being can enhance patients' psychosocial health. Objective: We aimed to describe patients' resilience experiences: how they understand, develop, and utilize resilience resources in managing ACHD. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of patients with ACHD. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted June 2020 to August 2021. We queried approaches to managing ACHD-related stress and experiences with resilience and analyzed responses with thematic analysis. Results: Participant (N = 25) median age was 32 years (range 22-44); 52% identified as female and 72% non-Hispanic white. Participants' anatomic ACHD was moderate (56%) or complex (44%); physiologically, 76% were functional class C or D. Participants described various resilience resources, which map to an established resilience framework: 1) internal resources: maintaining positivity, self-directed activity, and setting goals; 2) external resources: social support; 3) existential resources: purpose, gratitude, and cultivating health. Even among participants who reported feeling unfamiliar (8/25) with the term "resilience," all participants shared experiences reflecting resilience developed while living with ACHD. Conclusion: ACHD-relevant resilience resources may help patients and clinicians navigate ACHD-related stress and promote psychosocial well-being.

Beyond shadowing: Active involvement of pre-health undergraduate students in patient- and family-centered rounds.

An early introduction to interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) has many benefits for students. However, pre-health undergraduate (PHU) students have limited exposure to IPCP. Observing patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) offer a potential avenue for PHU students to learn about IPCP. This report describes a study wherein PHU students used the High-Value Care Rounding Tool (HVCRT) to collect observational data at Seattle Children's Hospital. Results were shared with a convenience sample of attending physicians (N = 17) from the observed care teams, who then completed a survey about their perceptions of the program. PHU students also participated in semi-structured interviews and surveys (N = 7). Observational data showed a low frequency of HVCRT topics discussed during PFCR (N = 53). Qualitative analysis of interview, survey, and observational data revealed 5 main themes: (1) PHU students provided tangible and actionable feedback on communication techniques for interprofessional teams, (2) PHU students observed PFCR from a family-like perspective, (3) PHU students' feedback was valued by attending physicians, (4) PHU students appreciated structured experiences for their future careers, and (5) PHU students had an engaging learning experience during PFCR. This program offered PHU students a structured shadowing experience and improved their understanding of IPCP, while also providing valuable feedback for health professionals.

Development and Usability Testing of a System to Detect Adverse Events and Medical Mistakes.

Many inpatient hospital visits result in adverse events, and a disproportionate number of adverse events are thought to occur among vulnerable populations. The personal and financial costs of these events are significant at the individual, care team, and system levels. Existing methods for identifying adverse events, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Global Trigger Tool, typically involve retroactive chart review to identify risks or triggers and then detailed review to determine whether and what type of harm occurred. These methods are limited in scalability and ability to prospectively identify triggers to enable intervention before an adverse event occurs. The purpose of this study was to gather usability feedback on a prototype of an informatics intervention based on the IHI method. The prototype electronic Global Trigger Tool collects and presents risk factors for adverse events. Six health professionals identified as potential users in clinical, quality improvement, and research roles were interviewed. Interviewees universally described insufficiencies of current methods for tracking adverse events and offered important information on desired future user interface features. A key next step will be to refine and integrate an electronic Global Trigger Tool system into standards-compliant electronic health record systems as a patient safety module.

Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design Teams.

The University of Washington's Engineering Innovation in Health program is a yearlong engineering design course sequence where senior undergraduate and graduate engineering students across different disciplines work in teams with health professionals to address their unmet needs. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, these team- and project-based courses shifted from an in-person to remote course environment. Here, we share innovative teaching strategies for a team-based, remote course environment. We show how this shift affected productivity by comparing survey results from before (in person) and during (remote) the pandemic. Preliminary results show that overall project outcomes and productivity were as high or, in some cases, higher during the pandemic than prior to the pandemic. These findings suggest that the innovative remote teaching strategies implemented by the teaching team provided effective options in the absence of certain hands-on experiences that are considered critical to engineering capstone design courses. A discussion on these teaching strategies in the context beyond the pandemic are considered in the discussion.

Can relational coordination theory be used to understand and improve interprofessional care coordination in schools? A pilot study.

Attending to the health needs of students with chronic conditions requires a fluid exchange of information and coordination between parents, educators, administrators, and school healthcare professionals. Previous research often omits school nurses in this exchange, although their role is key to successful outcomes. Relational Coordination (RC) theory posits that cohesive relationships help support communication, enabling stakeholders to coordinate their work. This article preliminarily explores whether RC domains might be relevant in school health settings, utilizing existing qualitative data. Responses from focus group sessions were analyzed using a deductive and inductive analytic approach. Data were coded using the 7 RC domains as a priori codes. Frequent, timely, and accurate communication emerged as major themes in the communication domain. Shared knowledge was a major theme within the relationship domain. Problem-solving communication, shared goals, and mutual respect were minor themes. The results suggest that improving interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and health outcomes in children with chronic conditions using RC theory-informed interventions will be important to deepen the understanding of how these different domains interact and influence student health outcomes.

Measuring the Impact of the National Train-the-Trainer Interprofessional Team Development Program (T3-ITDP) on the Implementation of Interprofessional Education and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice.

BACKGROUND: In order to prepare current and future educators and clinicians to lead interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), faculty and staff need training in collaborative approaches to developing, implementing, assessing, and sustaining high quality IPE across the interprofessional learning continuum. The Train-the-Trainer Interprofessional Team Development Program (T3-ITDP) is a 3.5-day program designed to develop expert IPE teams through interactive workshops, coaching, and the development and implementation of an IPE or IPCP (IPECP) project for their home institutions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of the T3-ITDP on the development and implementation of IPECP projects by participating teams. METHODS: The T3-ITDP impact survey was created and administered to collect data on the scope and impact of participant teams' projects, including learner and project outcomes, training methods, dissemination plans, assessment strategies, and teams' intentions to continue working together beyond the initial project. With human subject's approval, we invited 55 T3-ITDP participant teams to complete the impact survey. These teams were at least one year post-completion of the in-person portion of the program and thus had time to initiate their IPECP projects. RESULTS: Forty-one (74.5%) teams responded to the survey. Of those teams, 31 (76%) used T3-ITDP content and/or approaches to develop their IPECP projects that targeted learners across the interprofessional learning continuum. Sustainability of IPECP projects was supported through several mechanisms, including institutional support or incorporating IPECP activities into existing courses. Almost half of the teams worked together on new projects, and 74% of teams planned to repeat a newly developed activity. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS: Results of the T3-ITDP impact survey demonstrated that team-based, project-focused professional development catalyzed the development, implementation, and sustainment of new IPECP projects at academic and community institutions throughout the U.S.

A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals.

Poor communication within healthcare teams occurs commonly, contributing to inefficiency, medical errors, conflict, and other adverse outcomes. Interprofessional bedside rounds (IBR) are a promising model that brings two or more health professions together with patients and families as part of a consistent, team-based routine to share information and collaboratively arrive at a daily plan of care. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to investigate the breadth and quality of IBR literature to identify and describe gaps and opportunities for future research. We followed an adapted Arksey and O'Malley Framework and PRISMA scoping review guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase were systematically searched for key IBR words and concepts through June 2020. Seventy-nine articles met inclusion criteria and underwent data abstraction. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. Publications in this field have increased since 2014, and the majority of studies reported positive impacts of IBR implementation across an array of team, patient, and care quality/delivery outcomes. Despite the preponderance of positive findings, great heterogeneity, and a reliance on quantitative non-randomized study designs remain in the extant research. A growing number of interventions to improve safety, quality, and care experiences in hospital settings focus on redesigning daily inpatient rounds. Limited information on IBR characteristics and implementation strategies coupled with widespread variation in terminology, study quality, and design create challenges in assessing the effectiveness of models of rounds and optimal implementation strategies. This scoping review highlights the need for additional studies of rounding models, implementation strategies, and outcomes that facilitate comparative research.

Sustaining improvements in relational coordination following team training and practice change: A longitudinal analysis.

BACKGROUND: Poor communication is a leading cause of errors in health care. Structured interprofessional bedside rounds are a promising model to improve communication. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to test if an intervention to improve communication and coordination in an inpatient heart failure care unit would result in lasting change. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The relational coordination (RC) survey was administered to seven workgroups (i.e., nurses, physicians) at baseline (2015) and three subsequent years following the intervention (team training, leadership development workshops, and structured interprofessional bedside round implementation). Descriptive analysis and mixed-effects models were used to assess the impact of the intervention on improving RC. RESULTS: During the study period (2015-2018), 344 participants completed the survey for an overall response rate of 53.5% (n = 643). Postintervention, the RC index significantly increased from 3.79 to 4.08 (p < .001) and remained significantly higher over 2 years, with an RC index of 4.12 and 4.04, respectively (p < .001). The range of RC scores between and within workgroups narrowed over time, with nonrotating workgroups showing the most improvements. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that positive changes as a result of the intervention have been sustained, despite high rates of turnover among all workgroups. Notably, positive change in RC was found to be more pronounced for nonrotating workgroups compared to team members who rotate within the hospital (i.e., pharmacists who rotate to other units every month). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This intervention holds promise for teams seeking best practice models of "high-reliability" care organization and delivery. Sustained changes from this intervention represent an important area of future practice-based research.

Relationships Between the Great Recession and Widening Maternal and Child Health Disparities: Findings From Washington and Florida.

The purpose of this study was to explore relationships between the Great Recession in the United States and maternal and child health (MCH) disparities in prenatal care, birth weight, gestational age, and infant mortality. Using annual, 2005-2011 individual-level Washington (WA) and Florida (FL) birth certificate data, we analyzed MCH outcome rates and disparities among subpopulation component groups (e.g., subpopulation 'maternal ethnicity' divided into component groups such as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black). We focused on whether disparities widened during two recession periods: Period 1 (December 2007-June 2009-official dates of Great Recession) and Period 2 (January 2010-December 2011) and compared these to a Baseline Period 0 (January 2005-March 2007). Subpopulations (n=14) and component groups (n=47) were identified a priori. Results indicate that disparities widened on at least one MCH outcome for 22 component groups in WA during Period 1 and 37 component groups during Period 2, compared to baseline. In FL, disparities widened for 25 component groups during Period 1 and 31 during Period 2. Disparities increased in both periods on the same outcomes for 11 WA component groups and 7 component groups in FL. Disparity increases tended to cluster among those with young age, low education, and among members of minority race/ethnicity groups-particularly Black mothers. Findings support hypothesized relationships between expected increases in need during the Great Recession, and worsening MCH outcomes and disparities. Compared to baseline, there were more disparity increases in Period 2 than 1. Additional research regarding specific factors influencing changes in disparities are needed.