Hip joint center lateralization minimally affects the biomechanics of patient-specific flanged acetabular components: A computational model.

Patient-specific flanged acetabular components are utilized to treat failed total hip arthroplasties with large acetabular defects. Previous clinical studies from our institution showed that these implants tend to lateralize the acetabular center of rotation. However, the clinical impact of lateralization on implant survivorship is debated. Our goal was to develop a finite element model to quantify how lateralization of the native hip center affects periprosthetic strain and implant-bone micromotion distributions in a static level gait loading condition. To build the model, we computationally created a superomedial acetabular defect in a computed tomography 3D reconstruction of a native pelvis and designed a flanged acetabular implant to address this simulated bone defect. We modeled two implants, one with ~1 cm and a second with ~2 cm of hip center lateralization. We applied the maximum hip contact force and corresponding abductor force observed during level gait. The resulting strains were compared to bone fatigue strength (0.3% strain) and the micromotions were compared to the threshold for bone ingrowth (20 µm). Overall, the model demonstrated that the additional lateralization only slightly increased the area of bone at risk of failure and decreased the areas compatible with bone ingrowth. This computational study of patient-specific acetabular implants establishes the utility of our modeling approach. Further refinement will yield a model that can explore a multitude of variables and could be used to develop a biomechanically-based acetabular bone loss classification system to guide the development of patient-specific implants in the treatment of large acetabular bone defects.

Does Approach Matter in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Comparison of Early Reoperations Between Direct Anterior and Postero-Lateral Approach.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether direct anterior approach (DAA) or postero-lateral approach (PLA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) confers a lower risk of postoperative complications. Robotic assistance in THA results in a more consistently accurate component position compared to manual THA. The objective of this study was to compare rates of dislocation, reoperation, revision, and patient-reported outcome measures between patients undergoing DAA and PLA robotic-assisted primary THA. METHODS: We identified 2,040 consecutive robotic-assisted primary THAs performed for primary osteoarthritis, using DAA (n = 497) or PLA (n = 1,542) between 2017 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated survivorship free of dislocation, reoperation, and revision. Achievement of patient acceptable symptom state and minimum clinically important difference were used to compare changes in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: Dislocation was rare in this series (14 in 2,040, 0.7%), including 1 of 497 (0.2%) in the DAA cohort and 13 of 1,542 (0.8%) in the PLA cohort (P = .210). There was no difference in 2-year reoperation-free survivorship (97.8 versus 98.6%, P = .59) or revision-free survivorship (98.8 versus 99.0%, P = .87) at any time point. After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, there was no difference in dislocation, reoperation, or revision. At 6-week follow-up, after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients in the DAA cohort had higher odds of achieving HOOS JR minimum clinically important difference (odds ratio = 2.01, P = .012) and HOOS JR patient acceptable symptom state (odds ratio = 1.72, P = .028). There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures by 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: For robotic-assisted primary THA, DAA may confer enhanced early (<6 weeks) functional recovery compared to the PLA, but there was no significant difference in postoperative dislocation, reoperation, or revision rates.

Telemedicine in Arthroplasty Patients: Which Factors Are Associated With High Satisfaction?

Background: During the initial coronavirus pandemic lockdown period, remote hip and knee arthroplasty care was heavily employed out of necessity. However, data on patient satisfaction with telemedicine specific to hip and knee arthroplasty patients remains unknown. Methods: All patients who had a telemedicine visit in the hip and knee arthroplasty department and completed a telemedicine satisfaction survey at a specialty hospital from April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were identified. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine, gauged through a series of questions, were analyzed and evaluated over time. Independent factors associated with high satisfaction, defined as the "Top Box" response to the survey question "Likelihood of your recommending our video visit service to others," were identified. Results: Overall, 29,003 patients who had an in-person or telemedicine visit in the hip and knee arthroplasty department during the study period were identified. During the initial coronavirus pandemic lockdown period, defined as April 1, 2020-May 31, 2020, rate of overall telemedicine utilization was approximately 84%. After the initial lockdown period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization was approximately 8% of all visits per month. Average satisfaction scores for a series of 14 questions were consistently above 4.5 out of 5. Multivariable regression revealed younger age, particularly 18-64 years old, to be the only independent factor associated with high satisfaction with telemedicine. The rate of high satisfaction remained statistically similar throughout the study period (P > .05). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was consistently high in various domains and remained high throughout the study period, regardless of loosened pandemic restrictions. This technology will most likely continue to be utilized, but perhaps it should be targeted at patients younger than 65 years of age.

The John N. Insall Award: Does Melatonin Improve Subjective Sleep Quality After Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is a common problem following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study was to determine if exogenous melatonin improves sleep quality following primary TKA. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. A total of 172 patients undergoing unilateral TKA for primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either 5 mg melatonin (n = 86) or 125 mg vitamin C placebo (n = 86) nightly for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 6 weeks and 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 6-week and 90-day patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), morphine milligram equivalents prescribed, medication compliance, adverse events, and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: Mean PSQI scores worsened at 6 weeks before returning to the preoperative baseline at 90 days in both groups. There were no differences in PSQI scores between melatonin and placebo groups at 6 weeks (10.2 ± 4.2 versus 10.5 ± 4.4, P = .66) or 90 days (8.1 ± 4.1 versus 7.5 ± 4.0, P = .43). Melatonin did not improve the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, Visual Analog Scale for pain, or Veterans Rand 12 Physical Component Score or Mental Component Score at 6 weeks or 90 days. Poor sleep quality was associated with worse PROMs at 6 weeks and 90 days on univariate and multivariable analyses, but melatonin did not modify these associations. There were no differences in morphine milligram equivalents prescribed, medication compliances, adverse events, or 90-day readmissions between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exogenous melatonin did not improve subjective sleep quality or PROMs at 6 weeks or 90 days following TKA. Poor sleep quality was associated with worse patient-reported function and pain. Our results do not support the routine use of melatonin after TKA.

Correcting Hip Dysplasia in Young Adults: Intraoperative Navigation and Outcomes.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) often leads to characteristic acetabular dysplasia and typical femoral anomalies. There are numerous treatments for skeletally mature patients with DDH including hip arthroscopy, pelvic and femoral osteotomies, as well as total hip arthroplasty. Before proceeding to an arthroplasty procedure, it can be helpful to obtain an opinion of a hip preservation specialist to ascertain if alternative surgical treatments could contribute to the patient's care. In general, the use of robotic navigation has been associated with a higher proportion of cups placed in the Lewinnek safe zone, larger improvements in Harris Hip Scores, and no difference in overall complication rates in comparison to manual total hip arthroplasty. The use of robotic navigation allows for both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional preoperative templating, enabling the surgeon to plan the position of the construct such that it achieves maximum bony purchase and hip stability. In complex DDH cases, surgeons can work with a biomechanics department to complete a fit check assessment, which utilizes 3-dimensional templating software to ascertain the appropriateness of the implant's geometry with the patient's anatomy. Furthermore, a 3-dimensional printed plastic model of the pelvis and/or femur can be constructed in order to complete a rehearsal procedure, which may be particularly helpful for those cases involving osteotomies. The literature on the use of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with DDH demonstrates improved component positioning in comparison to navigated as well as manual methods; however, studies with long-term follow-up in this patient population are lacking.

Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Update on Navigation, Robotics, and Contemporary Advancements.

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains effective for improvement of pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis, there remain areas of continued pursuit of excellence, including decreasing rates of dislocation, leg length discrepancy, implant loosening, and infection. This review article covers several bearing surfaces and articulations, computer-assisted navigation and robotic technology, and minimally invasive surgical approaches that have sought to improve such outcomes. Perhaps the most significant improvement to THA implant longevity has been the broad adoption of highly cross-linked polyethylene, with low wear rates. Similarly, navigation and robotic technology has proven to more reproducibly achieve intraoperative component positioning, which has demonstrated clinical benefit with decreased risk of dislocation in a number of studies. Given the projected increase in THA over the coming decades, continued investigation of effective incorporation of technology, soft tissue-sparing approaches, and durable implants is imperative to continued pursuit of improved outcomes in THA.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed in Patients 35 Years of Age and Younger.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) for patients aged ≤35 years are rare but necessary for patients who have diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, osteonecrosis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Few studies have examined the 10-year and 20-year survivorship and clinical outcomes of TKAs for young patients. METHODS: A retrospective registry review identified 185 TKAs in 119 patients aged ≤ 35 years performed between 1985 and 2010 at a single institution. The primary outcome was implant survivorship free of revision. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at 2 time points: 2011 to 2012 and 2018 to 2019. The average age was 26 years (range, 12 to 35). Mean follow-up was 17 years (range, 8 to 33). RESULTS: Survivorship decreased from 84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79 to 90) at 5 years to 70% (95% CI: 64 to 77) at 10 years and to 37% (95% CI: 29 to 45) at 20 years. The most common reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (6%) and infection (4%). Risk factors for revision included increasing age at time of surgery (Hazards Ratio [HR] 1.3, P = .01) and use of constrained (HR 1.7, P = .05) or hinged prostheses (HR 4.3, P = .02). There were 86% of patients reporting that their surgery resulted in "a great improvement" or better. CONCLUSION: Survivorship of TKAs in young patients is less favorable than expected. However, for the patients who responded to our surveys, TKA demonstrated substantial pain relief and improvement in function at 17-year follow-up. Revision risk increased with older age and higher levels of constraint.

Hemostatic Agents in Orthopedic Surgery.

Controlling blood loss is a crucial aspect of orthopedic surgery. Hemostatic agents can be used intraoperatively in combination with antifibrinolytics as part of an overall strategy to limit blood loss. Several new hemostatic agents have recently come to the market designed specifically for vascular surgery but have found uses in other surgical fields, including orthopedics. This article reviews the mechanisms of action and best uses of various mechanical hemostats, active hemostats, flowable hemostats, and fibrin sealants for achieving hemostasis in orthopedic surgery. Mechanical and active hemostats have been reported to successfully decrease blood loss from cancellous bone, capillaries, and venules. Flowable hemostats are generally favorable for use in small spaces where the swelling capabilities of mechanical and active hemostats can be detrimental to surrounding structures. Sealants are best used for closing defects in tissues.

Outcomes After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty From a Specific, Now-Recalled Implant System.

BACKGROUND: A specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant system was recently recalled for high incidence of early polymeric wear and osteolysis. We analyzed the early outcomes of aseptic revision with these implants. METHODS: We identified 202 aseptic revision TKAs of this implant system performed at a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Revision indications included aseptic loosening (n = 120), instability (n = 55), and polymeric wear/osteolysis (n = 27). Components were revised in 145 cases (72%) and isolated polyethylene insert exchange occurred in 57 cases (28%). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine survivorship free from all-cause rerevision and rerevision risk factors. RESULTS: At 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause rerevision was 89 and 76% in the polyethylene exchange cohort versus 92 and 84% in the component revision cohort (P = .5). At 2 and 5 years, survivorship in revision with components from the same manufacturer was 89 and 80% compared to 95 and 86% in revision with components from a different manufacturer (P = .2). Among re-revisions (n = 30), cones (37%), sleeves (7%), hinge/distal femoral replacement implants were frequently used (13%). Men had increased risk for rerevision (hazard ratio = 2.3, P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this series of aseptic revision TKAs performed on a now-recalled implant system, survivorship free from rerevision was lower than expected when components from the same manufacturer were utilized, but comparable to contemporary reports when both the components were revised with an alternative implant system. Metaphyseal fixation with cones and sleeves as well as highly constrained implants was frequently utilized at time of rerevision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Wound Complications Are Affected by Different Skin Closure Methods in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on optimal skin closure and dressing strategies to reduce early wound complication rates after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: All 13,271 patients at low risk for wound complications undergoing primary, unilateral THA (7,816), and TKA (5,455) for idiopathic osteoarthritis at our institution between August 2016 and July 2021 were identified. Skin closure, dressing type, and postoperative events related to wound complications were recorded during the first 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: The need for unscheduled office visits to address wound complications was more frequent after TKA than THA (2.74 versus 1.78%, P < .001), and after direct anterior versus posterior approach THA (2.94 versus 1.39%, P < .001). Patients who developed a wound complication, had a mean of 2.9 additional office visits. Compared to the use of topical adhesives, skin closure with staples had the highest risk of wound complications (odds ratio 1.8 [1.07-3.11], P = .028). Topical adhesives with polyester mesh had higher rates of allergic contact dermatitis than topical adhesives without mesh (1.4 versus 0.5%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Wound complications after primary THA and TKA were often self-limited but increased burden on the patient, surgeon, and care team. These data, which suggest different rates of certain complications with different skin closure strategies, can inform a surgeon on optimal closure methods in their practice. Adoption of the skin closure technique with the lowest risk of complications in our hospital would conservatively result in a reduction of 95 unscheduled office visits and save a projected $585,678 annually.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Patients Have Lower Joint Awareness and Higher Function at 5 Years Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Matched Comparison.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up in patients following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to a matched cohort of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. METHODS: Patients who had primarily medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) who met criteria for medial UKA underwent TKA or medial UKA between 2014 and 2015 at a single institution, matched for age, sex, and body mass index. There were 127 UKAs in 120 patients and 118 TKAs in 116 patients included with minimum 5-year follow-up (range, 6 to 8). Mean age was 69 years (range, 59 to 79) and 71 years (range, 62 to 80) in the UKA and TKA groups, respectively (P = .049). RESULTS: Patients who underwent UKA had significantly higher mean (±SD) Forgotten Joint Scores (87 ± 20 versus 59 ± 34, P < .001); higher Knee Society Scores (88 ± 14 versus 75 ± 21, P < .001); and lower Numeric Pain Rating Scores (0.8 ± 1.6 versus 1.9 ± 2.2, P < .001). Survivorship free from all-cause revision was 96% (95% CI = 93%-99%) and 99% (95% CI = 97%-100%) at 5 years for TKA and UKA, respectively (P = .52). There were 8 both component revisions in the TKA group within 5 years from the date of surgery and 2 UKA conversions to TKA after 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients who have medial compartment OA and underwent UKA had significantly lower joint awareness, decreased pain, improved function, and higher satisfaction compared to matched TKA patients at minimum 5-year follow-up while maintaining excellent survivorship.

History of COVID-19 infection is not associated with increased D-dimer levels and risk of deep-vein thrombosis in total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: In the acute phase of COVID-19, elevated D-dimer levels indicate a hypercoagulable state putting the patients at increased risk for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). It is unclear, if prior COVID-19 disease increases the risk for VTE after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and if D-dimer levels can be used to identify patients at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D-Dimer levels of 313 consecutive SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive and 2,053 -negative patients undergoing TJA between 05/20 and 12/20 were evaluated. D-Dimer levels were divided into three groups: < 200 ng/ml, 200-400 ng/ml, and > 400 ng/ml D-dimer units (DDU). 277 SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive patients underwent a Doppler ultrasound to rule out deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) 4-6 weeks after TJA. RESULTS: D-Dimer levels did not differ significantly between SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive and -negative patients (p value 0.53). Among SARS-CoV-2 IgG-negative patients, 1687 (82.17%) had D-dimer levels < 200 ng/ml, 256 (12.47%) between 200 and 400 ng/ml, and 110 (5.36%) > 400 ng/ml. Of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive patients, 257 (83.71%) had D-dimer levels < 200 ng/ml, 34 (11.07%) between 200 and 400 ng/ml, and 16 (5.21%) > 400 ng/ml. A postoperative DVT was detected in nine patients (2.9%) in the SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive group and a PE in one patient (0.3%). 7/229 patients with < 200 ng/ml (3.1%), 1/28 patients (3.6%) with 200-400 ng/ml and 1/9 patients (11.1%) with D-dimer levels > 400 ng/ml had a DVT or PE (p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this investigation suggest there is no difference in D-dimer levels between SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive and -negative patients undergoing TJA. Although there is a trend for increased VTE rates with increased D-dimer levels, routine D-dimer testing is not recommended based on the current data. SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive patients have a low risk of VTE in the current study.

Predicting Implant Size in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Efficient resource management is becoming more important as the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of linear regression and Bayesian statistics in predicting implant size for THA using patient demographic variables. Material and methods: A retrospective, single-institution joint-replacement registry review was performed on patients who underwent primary THA from 2005 to 2019. Demographic information was obtained along with primary THA implant data. A total of 11,730 acetabular and 8536 femoral components were included. A multivariable regression model was created on a training cohort of 80% of the sample and applied to the validation cohort (remaining 20%). Bayesian posterior probability methods were applied to the training cohort and then tested in the validation cohort to determine the 1%, 5%, and 10% error tolerance thresholds. Results: The most predictive regression model included height, weight, and sex (cup: R2 = 0.57, all P < .001; stem mediolateral size [M/L]: R2 = 0.32, all P < .001). Removing weight had a minimal effect and resulted in a more parsimonious model (cup: R2 = 0.56, all P < .001; stem M/L: R2 = 0.32, all P < .001). Applying the posterior probability estimate to the validation cohort in the Bayesian model using height, weight, and sex demonstrated high accuracy in predicting the range of required implant sizes (95.3% cup and 90.4% stem M/L size). Conclusion: Implant size in THA is correlated with demographic variables to accurately predict implant size using Bayesian modeling. Predictive models such as linear regression and Bayesian modeling can be used to improve operating room efficiency, supply chain inventory management, and decrease costs associated with THA.

Decreased Implant Survival is Associated With Younger Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Younger patients are undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at increasing rates and may face multiple revisions during their lifetimes due to mechanical complications or infections. Questions/Purposes: We sought to compare the early complication rates and revision-free implant-survival rates across age groups of patients undergoing TKA, with particular focus on implant survival in younger patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data taken from a national insurance database on patients who underwent primary TKA from 2007 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier curve survival analysis and log rank test were performed to evaluate revision rates in 7 age groups (younger than 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90 or more years of age). Complication rates were compared to rates in the age 60 to 79 years age groups using multiple logistic regression, controlling for baseline demographics and comorbidities. Results: There were 114,698 patients included in the analysis. Patients in the younger than 40 years, 40 to 49 years, and 50 to 59 years age groups had increased rates of early mechanical complications; 90-day readmission rates were significantly higher in those age groups as well. Revision-free implant survival at 5 years was significantly worse in patients younger than 60 years of age, particularly those less than 40 years, who had a 77% revision-free implant-survival rate at 5 years. Conclusions: Younger patients had a higher risk of early revision after TKA, as well as an increased rate of mechanical complications and readmissions at 90 days. These outcomes suggest more study is needed to better understand these discrepancies and to better guide preoperative counseling for young patients considering TKA.

Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision after Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged ≤55 Years.

BACKGROUND: There is a relative paucity of literature on the outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in young patients. This study reports the survivorship and risk factors for re-revision in patients aged ≤55 years. METHODS: We identified 354 patients undergoing aseptic nononcologic rTHA at mean follow-up of 5 years after revision, with mean age of 48 years, body mass index of 28 kg/m2, and 64% female. Thirty-five (10%) patients underwent at least 1 previous rTHA. The main indications for rTHA included wear/osteolysis (21%), adverse local tissue reaction (21%), recurrent instability (20%), acetabular loosening (16%), and femoral loosening (7%); and included acetabular component-only rTHA in 149 patients (42%), femoral component-only rTHA in 46 patients (13%), both component rTHA in 44 patients (12%), and head/liner exchanges in patients 115 (33%). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure survivorship free from re-revision THA, and multivariate regression was used to identify risk factors for re-revision THA. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (18%) underwent re-revision THA at the mean time of 2.5 years, most commonly for instability (37%), aseptic loosening (27%), and prosthetic joint infection (15%). The rTHA survivorship from all-cause re-revision and reoperation was 83% and 79% at 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing femoral component only (hazard ratio 4.8, P = .014) and head/liner exchange rTHA (hazard ratio 2.5, P = .022) as risk factors for re-revision THA. CONCLUSION: About 1 in 5 patients aged ≤55 years undergoing rTHA required re-revision THA at 5 years, most commonly for instability. The highest risk group included patients undergoing head/liner exchanges and isolated femoral component revisions.

High Satisfaction and Activity Levels After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under Age 21.

BACKGROUND: With improved materials and bearing surfaces, the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients is increasing. Functional outcomes and activity level are particularly relevant in this higher-demand patient population. There is a paucity of data on patient-reported outcomes and activity levels after THA in extremely young (<21 years old) patients. METHODS: We identified 196 patients (222 hips) who underwent THA at age <21 years at our institution from 1982 to 2018. After applying exclusion criteria, 113 of 160 (70.6%) patients (129 hips) were available for follow-up. Patient activity levels and functional outcomes were evaluated using the UCLA activity score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and a validated 5-question satisfaction survey. Survivorship and reasons for revision were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 17.0 ± 2.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 2-38 years). The most common indications for THA were osteonecrosis (34%) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (30%). The mean UCLA activity score was 5.9 ± 2.0, and 64% of patients reported a score ≥6. The mean FJS was 57.9 ± 31.0. The mean Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement score was 84.6 ± 16.6. Ninety percent of patients reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with their surgery. At final follow-up, 27 of 129 (20.9%) hips had undergone revision surgery. CONCLUSION: THA performed in patients under 21 years of age with end-stage hip disease allows for high levels of activity and satisfaction postoperatively, with most patients being able to participate in moderate recreational activities. These data may be useful for surgeons in planning for and counseling extremely young patients indicated for THA.