Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Insufficiency: A Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increasingly been utilized in patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) with insufficient data on its safety. The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing TAVI for AI. Net clinical events (composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, major bleeding) and procedural complications were assessed using a propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR). A total of 185,703 (AI 3873, aortic stenosis [AS] 181,830) patients were included in the analysis. Due to a significant difference in the baseline characteristics, a matched sample of 7929 patients (AI 3873, AS 4056) was selected. At index admission, the adjusted odds of in-hospital NACE (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.59-2.51), mortality (aOR 3.06, 95% CI 2.38-5.47), major bleeding (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13-2.06) and valvular complications (aOR 9.48, 95% CI 6.73-13.38) were significantly higher in patients undergoing TAVI for AI compared with those undergoing TAVI for AS. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of NACE, mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation at 30- and 180-days follow-up. TAVI in AI was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural NACE, mortality, and major bleeding. The risk of these complications attenuated at 30- and 180-day readmission.

Improving Time to Defibrillation Following Ventricular Tachycardia (VTach) and Ventricular Fibrillation (VFib) Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Retrospective and Prospective Quality Improvement Study.

The goal of this study was to identify how often 2 independent centers defibrillated patients within the American Heart Association recommended 2-minute time interval following ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia arrest. A retrospective chart review revealed significant delays in defibrillation. Simulation sessions and modules were implemented to train nursing staff in a single nursing unit at a Philadelphia teaching hospital. Recruited nurses completed a code blue simulation session to establish a baseline time to defibrillation. They were then given 2 weeks to complete an online educational module. Upon completion, they participated in a second set of simulation sessions to assess improvement. First round simulations resulted in 33% with delayed defibrillation and 27% no defibrillation. Following the module, 77% of the second round of simulations ended in timely defibrillation, a statistically significant improvement ( P < 0.00001). Next steps involve prospective collection of the code blue data to analyze improvement in real code blue events.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

Background: The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. It is uncertain whether substrate modification with additional extensive ablation improves outcomes. We reviewed our experience to determine whether pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation (PVIEA) improves outcomes compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone (PVIA) for AF ablation. Methods: Consecutive cases of patients with PVIA versus PVIEA were compared between September 9, 2013 and December 12, 2020. Procedural data collected include radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT) and arrhythmia inducibility. Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post-procedure. Results: A total of 235 patients were studied (67 PVIA and 168 PVIEA). RADT was shorter when comparing ablation with PVIA versus PVIEA (32 vs. 40 min; p = .04). More arrhythmias were inducible with PVIEA (p < .01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank test p = .75), after 3 or 12 months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type (paroxysmal and persistent), left atrial volume, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left ventricular ejection fraction, or catheter ablation setting (high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, temperature-controlled non-contact-force). Conclusion: AF ablation with PVIA or PVIEA produces similar sinus rhythm maintenance overall and when stratified by catheter setting and AF type. PVIA reduced procedure times and less arrhythmias were inducible post-ablation.

High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.

INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has directly compared HPSD versus standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) contact force-sensing settings in patients presenting for repeat ablation with AF recurrence after initial ablation. METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing repeat ablation with SPSD or HPSD settings after their initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with temperature controlled non-contact force, SPSD or HPSD settings between 6/23/14 and 3/4/20. Procedural data collected included radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT). Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients underwent repeat ablation (36 SPSD, 25 HPSD). A total of 51 patients (83.6%) were found to have pulmonary vein reconnections necessitating repeat isolation, 10 patients (16.4%) had durable PVI and ablation targeted non-PV sources. RADT was shorter when comparing repeat ablation using HPSD compared to SPSD (22 vs 35 min; p = 0.01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log rank test p = 0.87), after 3 or 12-months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type, left atrial volume index, CHA2DS2-VASc score, or left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that repeat AF ablation with HPSD reduced procedure times with similar sinus rhythm maintenance compared to SPSD in those presenting for repeat ablation.

Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for power-controlled radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigates the outcomes of HPSD (50 W delivered for up to 15 s, Lesion Size Index of 5-6) compared to standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) (20-25 W until 400-500 gram seconds, up to 60 s) and temperature-controlled noncontact (TCNC) (20-40 W up to 60 s of ablation) settings. METHODS: We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with TCNC, SPSD, and HPSD between January 7th, 2013 and January 11th, 2019. Procedural data collected include time to isolate the left (LPVT) and right pulmonary veins (RPVT), total ablation time (TAT), and radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT). Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance postprocedure. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients were studied (44 TCNC, 51 SPSD, 76 HPSD). RADT was shorter when comparing HPSD to SPSD (25 vs. 41 min; p < .01), HPSD to TCNC (25 vs. 76 min; p < .01), and SPSD to TCNC groups (41 vs. 76 min; p < .01). TAT, LPVT, and RPVT were reduced between HPSD versus SPSD, HPSD versus TCNC, and SPSD versus TCNC groups, respectively (p < .01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log rank test p = .12), after 3 or 12 months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type, left atrial volume, CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, or left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: AF ablation with HPSD reduced procedure times with similar sinus rhythm maintenance compared to SPSD and TCNC.

Contemporary Analysis of Calculous Nephrectomy Utilization and Outcomes in the United States.

Introduction: Calculous nephrectomy was a mainstay of treatment of complex upper tract stone disease up until the 1970s, but data on its contemporary utilization in the current era of rising rates of stone disease are lacking. We characterized the nationwide utilization and outcomes for calculous nephrectomy in the United States. Patients and Methods: The National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases for 2001 to 2014 were queried for adults with a principal diagnosis of upper urinary tract calculi (UUTCs), who underwent nephrectomy as well as other inpatient surgeries for UUTCs. Per-population trend in utilization of calculous nephrectomy was analyzed using negative binomial regression. The proportion of calculous nephrectomy as a fraction of all inpatient surgical procedures for UUTCs was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Patient demographics, hospital characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and complications were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Of almost 1.42 million inpatient UUTC procedures performed over the study period, 9232 (0.65%) were calculous nephrectomies. Per-population utilization rate for calculous nephrectomy decreased significantly over time (incidence rate ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.91, p < 0.001). The proportion of calculous nephrectomy as a fraction of all inpatient surgical procedures for UUTC also decreased significantly over time (p < 0.0001). Majority of the procedures were performed in females, in urban teaching hospitals, and in the Southern United States. The overall complication rate was 38.3%, most commonly hemorrhage requiring transfusion (15.6%). Older age, female gender, and nonprivate insurance or lack of insurance were significant predictors of increased risk of complications, whereas hospitalization in urban hospitals was a predictor of lower risk. Conclusions: Despite increasing prevalence of stone disease in the United States in the contemporary era, utilization of calculous nephrectomy is low and is declining. Inpatient complication rates are moderately high and influenced by patient sociodemographic and hospital characteristics.