RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different suture patterns for gastrostomy closure, with a focus on major complications and survival time. We hypothesized that using a full-thickness single-layer simple continuous pattern would be as safe as the traditional double-layer pattern and would not be associated with more major complications. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the suture patterns used for gastric closure in clinical situations. ANIMALS: 60 dogs that underwent gastrostomy for foreign body removal, with 20 dogs in each group. METHODS: Dogs treated with gastrotomy from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2023, were randomly assigned to groups based on the suture pattern used at the gastrotomy site. Gastrotomies were closed with a double-layer inverting continuous pattern (DLI) in the DLI group. Gastrotomies were closed using a double-layer simple continuous pattern (DLS) in the DLS group. Gastrotomies were closed with a full-thickness single-layer simple continuous pattern (SLS) in the SLS group. RESULTS: All dogs were discharged from hospitalization. The survival rate did not differ among the 3 groups 1 month postoperatively, and major complications were not observed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using a full-thickness single-layer pattern is a safe alternative for gastrotomy closure.
Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía , Estómago , Perros , Animales , Estómago/cirugía , Gastrostomía/veterinaria , Suturas , Técnicas de Sutura/veterinariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of dogs surgically treated for gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV) after rapid versus prolonged medical stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, monoinstitutional. SAMPLE POPULATION: One hundred and sixty-two dogs with GDV. METHODS: Dogs presenting with a GDV were allocated to 1 of 2 groups, immediate or delayed. In the immediate group, dogs were stabilized for 90 min prior to undergoing surgery. In the delayed group, dogs underwent surgery after at least 5 h of stabilization. Medical stabilization included gastric decompression and placement of an indwelling nasogastric tube to prevent further gastric dilatation in all dogs. Short-term outcomes were compared between surgical timings by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Dogs (n = 89) in the immediate group underwent surgery a median time of 2.1 h after presentation (range 1.9-2.5 h), whereas those in the delayed surgery group (n = 73) were operated a median time of 9.8 h (range 5.4-13.7 h) after presentation. Survival rates did not differ between dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgery at discharge (70/89 and 60/73, respectively) or at 1 month postoperatively (68/89 and 55/73, respectively). The degree of gastric torsion was differently distributed between the 2 groups (P = .05). In the immediate group, 19, 52, and 9 dogs had a 0°, 180° and 270° gastric torsion respectively, whereas in the delayed group, 27, 32, and 5 dogs had a 0°, 180° and 270° gastric torsion respectively. Hyperlactatemia 24 h after initiation of fluid therapy was associated with an increased in-hospital mortality risk and at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: No survival benefit was detected as a result of proceeding to surgery after either a rapid or a prolonged medical stabilization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The aggressive stabilization and monitoring protocol described here can be considered as an alternative to stabilize dogs with GDV prior to surgery within 13.7 h of presentation. Further research is required to investigate the potential risks and benefits of prolonged over rapid stabilization and to identify candidates for each approach.