Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 35(10): 682-693, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37558548

RESUMEN

AIMS: To report toxicity profile, outcomes and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients' folders were retrospectively extracted, focusing on the primary neoplasm, previous systemic therapies and previous radiotherapy. Concerning SBRT, the total dose (five daily fractions) was delivered with a linear accelerator using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. Acute and late toxicities were assessed by the CTCAE 4.03 scale. QoL was evaluated according to the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS1 (fatigue), CLAS2 (energy level), CLAS3 (daily activities)]. RESULTS: Between December 2005 and August 2021, 23 patients (median age 71 years, range 48-80) with 27 lesions were treated. Most patients had endometrial (34.8%), ovarian (26.1%) and cervical cancer (26.1%) as the primary tumour. The most common SBRT schedules in five fractions were 30 Gy (33.3%), 35 Gy (29.6%) and 40 Gy (29.6%). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 3-128). There were no patients reporting acute or late toxicities higher than grade 2, except for a bone fracture. One- and 2-year local control was 77.9% and 70.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival was 82.6% and 75.1%, respectively. The overall response rate was 96.0%. Regarding QoL, no statistically significant difference was identified between the baseline and follow-up values: the median CLAS1, CLAS2 and CLAS3 scores for each category were 6 (range 4-10) at baseline and 6 (range 3-10) 1 month after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary experience suggests that SBRT retreatment for recurrent gynaecological cancer is a highly feasible and safe treatment with limited side-effects and no short-term QoL impairment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Radiocirugia , Reirradiación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calidad de Vida , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Reirradiación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 24(6): 1177-1183, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984604

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this analysis was to report toxicity and clinical outcomes in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for bone metastases. METHODS: We separately analyzed clinical data of PCa patients with bone oligometastases enrolled in a prospective phase I trial (DESTROY-2). DESTROY-2 was based on SRS delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in several extra-cranial body sites. Acute and late toxicity, biochemical tumor response, local control (LC), distant metastases-free (DPFS), progression-free (PFS), time to next-line systemic treatment-free (NEST-FS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS: Data on 37 PCa patients, carrying out 50 bone metastases, candidates for curative-intent treatment and treated with SRS at our Institution were collected. SRS dose ranged between 12 and 24 Gy. One grade 1 acute skin toxicity in one patient treated on the hip (24 Gy) and one grade 1 late skin toxicity in a patient with a scapular lesion (24 Gy) were recorded. No cases of bone fracture were registered in the treated population. With a median follow-up of 25 months (range 3-72 months) 2-year actuarial LC, DPFS, PFS, and OS were 96.7%, 58.1%, 58.1%, and 95.8%, respectively. Median and 2-year NEST-FS were 30 months (range 1-69 months) and 51.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis showed few toxicity events, high local control rate and prolonged NEST-FS after linear accelerator-based radiosurgery of bone oligometastases from PCa. The possibility of postponing systemic treatments in patients with oligometastatic PCa by means of SRS should be taken into account. Further prospective studies on larger series are needed to confirm the reported results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 38(6): 519-526, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34651242

RESUMEN

The prognosis of prostate cancer (PC) is generally favorable but the incidence of metastases is relatively high after the treatment of the primary tumor, especially in high-risk patients. Fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or single fraction stereotactic body radiosurgery (SRS) are emerging treatment options in this setting. However, data on SBRT/SRS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) are largely lacking, particularly in subjects with nodal lesions. Therefore, we evaluated outcomes and toxicity recorded in mCRPC patients with nodal oligoprogression. Patients included in this analysis had ≤ 5 metastatic sites without visceral lesions and underwent SBRT/SRS on nodal metastases. Thirty-eight patients carrying out 61 nodal metastases were analyzed. The median SRS dose was 20 Gy (range 12-24 Gy) and the most common schedule was 20 Gy (44.8%). The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (range 20-50 Gy) and the most common regimen was 45 Gy in 5 fractions (37.9%). Thirty-seven patients (97.4%) showed only grade 0-1 acute toxicity while one patient reported grade 2 dysphagia. In terms of late toxicity, one grade 2 laryngeal, one grade 1 skin and one grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities were recorded. Two-year actuarial local control (LC), distant progression-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 94.0, 47.2, 47.2, and 90.2%, respectively. Two-year next line systemic therapy-free survival (NEST-FS) was 67.7%. In conclusion, the efficacy in terms of LC of SBRT/SRS in patients with nodal metastases from PC was confirmed. Moreover, this analysis suggests the efficacy in terms of PFS and NEST-FS also in the setting of oligoprogressive PC. In fact, about one-third of patients were free from progressive disease and two-third of subjects did not require hormonal therapy switch or discontinuation three years after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/radioterapia , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/mortalidad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Semergen ; 40(3): 143-8, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24001573

RESUMEN

The bisphosphonates are stable inorganic pyrophosphate analogs that have demonstrated their efficacy in treatment of osteolytic lesions associated with bony metastases, and multiple myeloma, malignant hypercalcemia, Paget's disease, and osteoporosis. Several publications within the last few years have suggested that osteonecrosis of the jaw is associated with bisphosphonate therapy. The diagnosis and management strategies of the patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is very difficult. It is important for patients to be informed of the risk of this complication, so that they have the opportunity to assess the need for dental treatment before starting therapy. Preventive measures must be taken before, during, and after treatment with bisphosphonates. If osteonecrosis of the jaw is present, management should be conservative: oral chlorhexidine and antibiotics. Surgical treatment should be reserved for those patients who are symptomatic.


Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/prevención & control , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/diagnóstico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA