Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Med Microbiol ; 71(8)2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994523

RESUMEN

Introduction. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that can facilitate the diagnosis of a panel of tropical infectious diseases are critically needed. DPP® Fever Panel II Asia is a multiplex lateral flow immunoassay comprising antigen and IgM panels for the diagnosis of pathogens that commonly cause febrile illness in Southeast Asia.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Accuracy of DPP® Fever Panel II Asia has not been evaluated in clinical studies.Aim. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of DPP® Fever Panel II Asia for malaria, dengue and melioidosis.Methodology. We conducted a cohort-based case-control study. Both cases and controls were derived from a prospective observational study of patients presenting with community-acquired infections and sepsis in northeast Thailand (Ubon sepsis). We included 143 and 98 patients diagnosed with malaria or dengue based on a positive PCR assay and 177 patients with melioidosis based on a culture positive for Burkholderia pseudomallei. Controls included 200 patients who were blood culture-positive for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, and cases of the other diseases. Serum samples collected from all patients within 24 h of admission were stored and tested using the DPP® Fever Panel II Asia antigen and IgM multiplex assays. We selected cutoff values for each individual assay corresponding to a specificity of ≥95 %. When assessing diagnostic tests in combination, results were considered positive if either individual test was positive.Results. Within the DPP® Fever Panel II Asia antigen assay, a combination of pLDH and HRPII for malaria had a sensitivity of 91 % and a specificity of 97 %. The combination of dengue NS1 antigen and dengue antibody tests had a sensitivity of 61 % and a specificity of 91 %. The B. pseudomallei CPS antigen test had a sensitivity of 27 % and a specificity of 97 %. An odds ratio of 2.34 (95 % CI 1.16-4.72, P=0.02) was observed for the association between CPS positivity and mortality among melioidosis patients.Conclusion. The performance of the DPP® Fever Panel II Asia for diagnosis of malaria was high and that for dengue and melioidosis was relatively limited. For all three diseases, performance was comparable to that of other established RDTs. The potential operational advantages of a multiplex and quantitative point-of-care assay are substantial and warrant further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Dengue , Malaria , Melioidosis , Sepsis , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dengue/diagnóstico , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M , Malaria/diagnóstico , Melioidosis/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tailandia/epidemiología
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e041022, 2021 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a Sepsis Fast Track (SFT) programme initiated at a regional referral hospital in Thailand in January 2015. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis using the data of a prospective observational study (Ubon-sepsis) from March 2013 to January 2017. SETTING: General medical wards and medical intensive care units (ICUs) of a study hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with community-acquired sepsis observed under the Ubon-sepsis cohort. Sepsis was defined as modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score ≥2. MAIN EXPOSURE: The SFT programme was a protocol to identify and initiate sepsis care on hospital admission, implemented at the study hospital in 2015. Patients in the SFT programme were admitted directly to the ICUs when available. The non-exposed group comprised of patients who received standard of care. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were measured sepsis management interventions. RESULTS: Of 3806 sepsis patients, 903 (24%) were detected and enrolled in the SFT programme of the study hospital (SFT group) and 2903 received standard of care (non-exposed group). Patients in the SFT group had more organ dysfunction, were more likely to receive measured sepsis management and to be admitted directly to the ICU (19% vs 4%). Patients in the SFT group were more likely to survive (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.88, p=0.001) adjusted for admission year, gender, age, comorbidities, modified SOFA Score and direct admission to the ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: The SFT programme is associated with improved sepsis care and lower risk of death in sepsis patients in rural Thailand, where some critical care resources are limited. The survival benefit is observed even when all patients enrolled in the programme could not be admitted directly into the ICUs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02217592.


Asunto(s)
Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Tailandia
4.
J Intensive Care ; 7: 55, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31827803

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The burden of sepsis is highest in low- and middle-income countries, though the management of sepsis in these settings is poorly characterized. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the early management of sepsis in Thailand. METHODS: Pre-planned analysis of the Ubon-sepsis study, a single-center prospective cohort study of Thai adults admitted to the general medical wards and medical intensive care units (ICUs) of a regional referral hospital with community-acquired sepsis. RESULTS: Between March 2013 and January 2017, 3,716 patients with sepsis were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (IQR 44-72, range 18-101), 58% were male, and 88% were transferred from other hospitals. Eighty-six percent of patients (N = 3,206) were evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED), where median length of stay was less than 1 hour. Within the first day of admission, most patients (83%, N = 3,089) were admitted to the general medical wards, while 17% were admitted to the ICUs. Patients admitted to the ICUs had similar age, gender, and comorbidities, but had more organ dysfunction and were more likely to receive measured sepsis management interventions. Overall, 84% (N = 3,136) had blood cultures ordered and 89% (N = 3,308) received antibiotics within the first day of hospital admission. Among the 3,089 patients admitted to the general medical wards, 38% (N = 1,165) received an adrenergic agent, and 21% (N = 650) received invasive mechanical ventilation. Overall mortality at 28 days was 21% (765/3,716), and 28-day mortality in patients admitted to the ICUs was higher than that in patients admitted to the general medical wards within the first day (42% [263/627] vs. 16% [502/3,089], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis in a regional referral hospital in rural Thailand, where some critical care resources are limited, is commonly managed on general medical wards despite high rates of respiratory failure and shock. Enhancing sepsis care in the ED and general wards, as well as improving access to ICUs, may be beneficial in reducing mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Ubon-sepsis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02217592).

5.
PLoS One ; 13(9): e0204509, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30256845

RESUMEN

Infection and sepsis are leading causes of death worldwide but the epidemiology and outcomes are not well understood in resource-limited settings. We conducted a four-year prospective observational study from March 2013 to February 2017 to examine the clinical epidemiology and outcomes of adults admitted with community-acquired infection in a resource-limited tertiary-care hospital in Ubon Ratchathani province, Northeast Thailand. Hospitalized patients with infection and accompanying systemic manifestations of infection within 24 hours of admission were enrolled. Subjects were classified as having sepsis if they had a modified sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 at enrollment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02217592. A total of 4,989 patients were analyzed. Of the cohort, 2,659 (53%) were male and the median age was 57 years (range 18-101). Of these, 1,173 (24%) patients presented primarily to the study hospital, 3,524 (71%) were transferred from 25 district hospitals or 8 smaller hospitals in the province, and 292 (6%) were transferred from one of 30 hospitals in other provinces. Three thousand seven hundred and sixteen (74%) patients were classified as having sepsis. Patients with sepsis had an older age distribution and a greater prevalence of comorbidities compared to patients without sepsis. Twenty eight-day mortality was 21% (765/3,716) in sepsis and 4% (54/1,273) in non-sepsis patients (p<0.001). After adjusting for gender, age, and comorbidities, sepsis on admission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.48-4.41, p<0.001), blood culture positive for pathogenic organisms (adjusted HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.89-2.58, p<0.001) and transfer from other hospitals (adjusted HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.69-2.81, p<0.001) were independently associated with mortality. In conclusion, mortality of community-acquired sepsis in Northeast Thailand is considerable and transferred patients with infection are at increased risk of death. To reduce mortality of sepsis in this and other resource-limited setting, facilitating rapid detection of sepsis in all levels of healthcare facilities, establishing guidelines for transfer of sepsis patients, and initiating sepsis care prior to and during transfer may be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Recursos en Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/microbiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Tailandia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 95(9): 1194-9, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23140037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate children's weight estimation is necessary and important for emergency pediatric care, particularly for drug dosages, electrical therapy, or equipment sizes. Children's weight is difficult to measure in critically ill patients. Several methods were developed to estimate children's accurate weight. Most methods were developed from western countries. The methods used currently might not work with Thai children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Broselow tape, family member estimation and the 50th percentile of national weight for height correlation graph for Thai children's weight estimation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors carried out a prospective study. Children from neonate to 12 years old who presented to the emergency department and general outpatient pediatric clinic were included. The patients were studied in both overall and subgroup analysis (less than 10 kg, 10 to 25 kg, 25 to 40 kg, and over 40 kg). The primary outcome was the accuracy within 10% error of the measured weight and the mean difference of the weight. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety five patients were included in the present study. There were 333 (55.97%) boys and 262 (44.03%) girls. Family member estimation was the most accurate method with the accuracy within 10% error 85.21% and had the lowest mean difference (-0.262 kg). Family members could estimate weight accurately for all weight subgroups. The Broselow tape was the second most accurate method with the accuracy within 10% error 56.13% and the low mean difference (-0.485 kg). The accuracy within 10% error of the 50th percentile of national weight for height correlation graph was 51.43% and the mean difference was -0.648 kg. Every method had the best estimation in the weight subgroup 10 to 25 kg except the Broselow tape. CONCLUSION: Family member estimation was the most accurate method in the present study. The family member could estimate the children's weight within 10% error of the measured weight about 85% of cases. In case where family member estimation was not available, the Broselow tape was the next accurate alternative method.


Asunto(s)
Antropometría/métodos , Peso Corporal , Niño , Preescolar , Precisión de la Medición Dimensional , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Tailandia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA