Normal Risk Ovarian Screening Study: 21-Year Update.

PURPOSE: The Normal Risk Ovarian Screening Study (NROSS) tested a two-stage screening strategy in postmenopausal women at conventional hereditary risk where significantly rising cancer antigen (CA)-125 prompted transvaginal sonography (TVS) and abnormal TVS prompted surgery to detect ovarian cancer. METHODS: A total of 7,856 healthy postmenopausal women were screened annually for a total of 50,596 woman-years in a single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00539162). Serum CA125 was analyzed with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) each year. If risk was unchanged and <1:2,000, women returned in a year. If risk increased above 1:500, TVS was undertaken immediately, and if risk was intermediate, CA125 was repeated in 3 months with a further increase in risk above 1:500 prompting referral for TVS. An average of 2% of participants were referred to TVS annually. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were referred for operations detecting 15 ovarian cancers and two borderline tumors with 12 in early stage (I-II). In addition, seven endometrial cancers were detected with six in stage I. As four ovarian cancers and two borderline tumors were diagnosed with a normal ROCA, the sensitivity for detecting ovarian and borderline cancer was 74% (17 of 23), and 70% of ROCA-detected cases (12 of 17) were in stage I-II. NROSS screening reduced late-stage (III-IV) disease by 34% compared with UKCTOCS controls and by 30% compared with US SEER values. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 50% (17 of 34) for detecting ovarian cancer and 74% (25 of 34) for any cancer, far exceeding the minimum acceptable study end point of 10% PPV. CONCLUSION: While the NROSS trial was not powered to detect reduced mortality, the high specificity, PPV, and marked stage shift support further development of this strategy.

Patterns of palliative care referral in ovarian cancer: A single institution 5 year retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that patients with advanced cancer receive dedicated palliative care services early in their disease course. This investigation serves to understand how palliative care services are utilized for ovarian cancer patients in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of women treated for ovarian cancer at our institution from 2010 through 2015. Clinical variables included presence and timing of palliative care referral. Data were correlated utilizing univariable and multivariable parametric and non-parametric testing, and survivals were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and cox-proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 391 women treated for ovarian cancer, of whom 68% were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. Palliative care referral was utilized in 28% in the outpatient (42%) and inpatient (58%) settings. Earlier use of referral was observed in those who never underwent surgical cytoreduction or had interval cytoreductive surgery (p < 0.001). Palliative care referral was independently associated with advanced stage (OR 1.7, p = 0.02), recurrence (OR 2.0, p = 0.002) and hospice referral (OR 6.0, p < 0.001). In 38% of women referral occurred within 30 days of death, and 17% within one week of death. Outpatient initial consultation was associated with an unadjusted 1 year overall survival benefit (p < 0.01) compared to inpatient consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes in this study suggest a late use of palliative care that is reactionary to patient needs and not a routine component of ovarian cancer care as national guidelines recommend.

Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Debulking Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 3-year survival, length of hospitalization, perioperative mortality, risk of readmission, and residual disease associated with laparoscopic and laparotomic interval debulking surgery among women with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to identify a cohort of patients diagnosed with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2012 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery. We compared 3-year overall survival, duration of postoperative hospitalization, 90-day postoperative mortality, and residual disease status between women who underwent interval debulking by laparoscopy and by laparotomy. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models in survival analyses. At a significance of .05, this study had 80% power to detect an 8% difference in 3-year survival. The main analysis was intention to treat. RESULTS: We identified 3,071 women meeting inclusion criteria, of whom 450 (15%) underwent surgery initiated laparoscopically. There was no difference in 3-year survival between patients undergoing laparoscopy [47.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 41.4-53.5] and laparotomy (52.6%; 95% CI 50.3-55.0; P=.12). Survival did not differ after adjustment for demographic characteristics, facility type, presence of comorbidities, and stage (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI 0.93-1.28; P=.26). Postoperative hospitalization was slightly shorter in the laparoscopy group (median 4 compared with 5 days, P<.001). Frequency of readmission (5.3% compared with 3.7%; P=.26), death within 90 days of surgery (2.8% compared with 2.9%, P=.93), and suboptimal debulking (20.6% compared with 22.6%, P=.29) did not differ between patients undergoing laparoscopy and laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Ovarian cancer patients selected for laparoscopic interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have 3-year survival rates similar to women who undergo interval debulking by laparotomy. Laparoscopy is associated with a modestly shorter postoperative hospitalization, whereas readmission rates and risk of perioperative death are similar for the surgeries.

Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whereas advances in minimally invasive surgery have made laparoscopic staging technically feasible in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer, the practice remains controversial because of an absence of randomized trials and lack of high-quality observational studies demonstrating equivalent outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to evaluate the association of laparoscopic staging with survival among women with clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify all women who underwent surgical staging for clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2010 through 2012. The exposure of interest was planned surgical approach (laparoscopy vs laparotomy), and the primary outcome was overall survival. The primary analysis was based on an intention to treat: all women whose procedures were initiated laparoscopically were categorized as having had a planned laparoscopic procedure, regardless of subsequent conversion to laparotomy. We used propensity methods to match patients who underwent planned laparoscopic staging with similar patients who underwent planned laparotomy based on observed characteristics. We compared survival among the matched cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. We compared the extent of lymphadenectomy using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Among 4798 eligible patients, 1112 (23.2%) underwent procedures that were initiated laparoscopically, of which 190 (17%) were converted to laparotomy. Women who underwent planned laparoscopy were more frequently white, privately insured, from wealthier ZIP codes, received care in community cancer centers, and had smaller tumors that were more frequently of serous and less often of mucinous histology than those who underwent staging via planned laparotomy. After propensity score matching, time to death did not differ between patients undergoing planned laparoscopic vs open staging (hazard ratio, 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.09; P = .13). Planned laparoscopic staging was associated with a slightly higher median lymph node count (14 vs 12, P = .005). Planned laparoscopic staging was not associated with time to death after adjustment for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, histological type and grade, and pathological stage (hazard ratio, 0.82, 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.16). CONCLUSION: Surgical staging via planned laparoscopy vs laparotomy was not associated with worse survival in women with apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

Power Morcellation of Unsuspected High-grade Leiomyosarcoma Within an Inflated Containment Bag: 2-year Follow-up.

The diagnosis of an unsuspected leiomyosarcoma after hysterectomy for the treatment of a presumed benign leiomyoma is a rare but highly clinically significant event. In order to facilitate removal of large uterine specimens using a minimally invasive surgical approach, morcellation with extraction in pieces is often performed. In the event of unsuspected malignancy, this may result in abdominal dispersion of the tumor and contribute to poorer survival. In the present article, we report a case of contained power morcellation of an unsuspected high-grade leiomyosarcoma with 2 years of follow-up. Although further study is necessary, this technique may minimize the risk that women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation have a worse prognosis when diagnosed with an unexpected malignancy.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update.

The preferred surgical approach for many gynecologic oncology procedures is now laparoscopy. Reduced morbidity, shorter hospitalization and a more rapid recovery have been associated with minimally invasive surgical approaches when compared to laparotomy. Incisional morbidity, including vascular and viscous injury, postoperative hernia, infection, and pain remain significant concerns. Use of fewer and smaller incisions during laparoscopy may be expected to further minimize these risks. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), or single incision laparoscopy, describes the use of one small skin incision to complete laparoscopic surgical procedures. Recent advances in instrumentation have allowed increasingly complex procedures in gynecologic cancer patients to be completed. This review will serve as an update in regards to implementation of LESS in gynecologic oncology. Technical challenges encountered during performance of LESS as well as strategies to overcome these challenges will be discussed.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in the Management of Gynecologic Malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the experience with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in the treatment of gynecologic cancers at the Massachusetts General Hospital. METHODS: From January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2011, 32 patients were treated with IORT at Massachusetts General Hospital. Hospital, pathology, and office medical records and radiation oncology records were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) data. RESULTS: In 27 patients (84.4), surgical resection margins were microscopically positive. In 5 patients (15.6%), margins were grossly positive. For patients with microscopic disease, 5-year disease-free survival was 40.9% (57 mo), compared with 9.1% (23 mo) for those with gross residual disease (P=0.001). Five-year OS was also statistically improved for patients with microscopic residual disease, when compared with OS among patients with gross residual disease, 77.3% (93 mo) and 54.5% (40 mo), respectively (P=0.001). The risk of distant metastases in patients with gross residual disease was 87%, compared with 28% in patients with microscopic disease (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Volume of residual disease before IORT is an important prognostic indicator. Local recurrence and distant metastases were more common among patients with gross residual disease left in situ at time of IORT. Our institutional experience with IORT further supports the importance of complete surgical resection.

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium Compared With Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: A SEER Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Mucinous endometrial cancer (MEC) is a rare histologic subtype of endometrial cancers. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients with MEC with patients with endometrioid endometrial cancers (EEC), and to determine whether there are significant clinicopathologic differences between these tumors. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data for 1988 to 2009 was reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were compared. The impact of histology on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 104,659 women, 103,097 (98.5%) had EEC and 1562 (1.5%) MEC. The mean age at diagnosis for EEC and MEC was 62 and 63.4, respectively (P<0.001). MEC tumors were more frequently classified as grade 1 (51.3% vs. 44%; P<0.001). In patients with MEC, a higher rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis (16.3% vs. 10.4%; P<0.001) was noted, but not para-aortic lymph node metastasis (5.1% vs. 4%; P=0.1). After adjusting for race, period of diagnosis, SEER registry, marital status, stage, age, surgery, radiotherapy, grade, histology, and lymph node dissection, there was no difference in survival between MEC and EEC (hazard ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mucinous histology does not significantly affect survival when compared with endometrioid histology in endometrial cancer. Patients with MEC were more likely to have positive pelvic lymph nodes at the time of surgery.

Medical Device Safety and Surgical Dissemination of Unrecognized Uterine Malignancy: Morcellation in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

UNLABELLED: There is a risk of dissemination of uterine malignancies during minimally invasive hysterectomies when morcellation is used. Although the technique of uterine power morcellation allows timely removal of large benign tumors through small laparoscopic incisions, there are concerns about iatrogenic spread of cancers and reduced survival for women with preoperatively unrecognized malignancies. This review examines the literature on intraperitoneal spread and implantation of mechanically disrupted malignant tissue, discusses the current diagnostic tools for preoperative assessment of uterine tumors, and summarizes the current recommendations of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Recommendations include informed consent of the risk of disseminating an otherwise contained malignancy, appropriate preoperative evaluation for malignancy, and development of alternatives to intracorporeal morcellation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preoperative assessment of uterine masses or abnormal uterine bleeding must include understanding of the limitations of an endometrial biopsy and imaging studies to evaluate the possibility of a uterine malignancy. Minimally invasive surgery using morcellation of benign uterine growths is well established and safe; however, alternative surgical techniques to morcellation must be considered when the malignant potential of a uterine mass is uncertain. Morcellation carries the risk of widespread peritoneal seeding of an unrecognized uterine malignancy. Gynecologic surgeons must weigh the unlikely occurrence of disseminating an undiagnosed uterine sarcoma with the much more common surgical risks of abdominal surgery.

Changing Trends in Lymphadenectomy for Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the use of lymphadenectomy for endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium between 1998 and 2012. METHODS: A time-trend analysis was conducted using a population-based cancer registry covering 28% of the population of the United States. To quantify differences over the study period time, the frequency of lymphadenectomy and nodal metastasis among women who underwent surgical treatment of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma was compared among consecutive 3- to 4-year periods. Biannual frequency of lymphadenectomy was modeled with Joinpoint regression to identify when potential changes in trends occurred and calculate annual percentage change. RESULTS: A total of 74,365 women who underwent surgery between 1998 and 2012 were analyzed. Frequency of lymphadenectomy increased by 4.2% annually (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-4.6) from 1998 to 2007, after which the frequency declined by 1.6% per year (95% CI 0.9-2.2). Between 1998-2000 and 2007-2009, the frequency of lymphadenectomy rose from 48.7% to 65.5% (risk difference 16.8%, 95% CI 15.4-18.1), the proportion of women found to have nodal metastasis increased by 1.1% (95% CI 0.4-1.7), and the frequency of negative lymphadenectomy increased by 15.7% (95% CI 14.3-17.1). The decline in frequency of lymphadenectomy after 2007 was associated a 3.1% (95% CI 2.1-4.1) decline in the rate of negative lymphadenectomy, but no change in the proportion of women found to have nodal metastasis (P=.17). CONCLUSION: The frequency of lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrioid endometrial cancer increased by 4.2% annually from 1998 to 2007 and decreased by 1.6% annually from 2007 to 2012. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Incidence and effects on mortality of venous thromboembolism in elderly women with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of thromboembolic events (venous thromboembolism) before and after the diagnosis of epithelial endometrial cancer and to evaluate the effects of these events on survival. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries linked to Medicare claim files to identify patients with epithelial endometrial cancer diagnosed between 1992 and 2009. To identify venous thromboembolism events 3 months before diagnosis and up to 24 months after diagnosis, we used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. RESULTS: A total of 23,122 patients were included; of them 1,873 (8.1%) developed a venous thromboembolism. Patients with low-grade (grades 1 and 2) endometrioid adenocarcinoma had a significantly lower rate of venous thromboembolism 3 months before and 6 months after the diagnosis of cancer (3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-3.9%) compared with carcinosarcoma (9.2%; 95% CI 7.8-10.8%), clear cell (6.9%; 95% CI 4.8-9.7%), uterine serous cancer (8.1%; 95% CI 7.01-9.3%), and grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma (6.1%; 95% CI 5.4-6.9%) (P<.001). On multivariate analysis during the same time period, most recent time periods of diagnosis, carcinosarcoma histology compared with lower grade endometrial cancer, higher stage, African American race, marital status, chemotherapy delivery, and lymph node dissection were associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism. The median overall survival for women who experienced a venous thromboembolism 3 months before the diagnosis of endometrial cancer was 31 months (95% CI 20-48 months); in women diagnosed with venous thromboembolism 6 months after the cancer diagnosis was 37 months (95% CI 31-44), and in women who did not experienced a venous thromboembolism was 111 months (95% CI 109-114). After adjusting for prognostic factors, there was an association between venous thromboembolism diagnosed 3 months before endometrial cancer (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.34-2.13) or 6 months after the diagnosis (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-1.71) and lower survival. CONCLUSION: Patients with uterine serous cancer, carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, and grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma had a higher rate of venous thromboembolism than patients with low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma. A diagnosis of venous thromboembolism was associated with decreased survival in elderly patients with endometrial cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Delay in chemotherapy administration impacts survival in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to characterize chemotherapy treatment patterns in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and their impact on overall survival (OS). METHODS: We identified patients age ≥65years with stage II-IV EOC who underwent cytoreduction from 2003 to 2011. Relevant clinical variables were extracted and correlated with OS. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier methods, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four patients were included in the analysis. The average age was 73years with American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Class 2 or 3. Approximately 78% underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS). OS for the entire cohort was 3.3years. One hundred and fifty-seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, of which 70% received initial platinum-based doublet therapy; 67.5% of patients were able to complete the intended six cycles of chemotherapy; of these, 34% experienced a dose reduction and 45% experienced one or more dose delays. Any dose delay was associated with a decrease in overall survival (p=0.02) and remained significant even after controlling for age, stage, and residual disease and number of chemotherapy cycles received (p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly EOC patients frequently required chemotherapy dose reductions and delays in chemotherapy administration. Multivariate analysis confirmed that dose delays are an independent factor associated with decreased OS.

Trends in Treatment of Uterine Serous Cancer in the Medicare Population.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy delivery in the treatment of uterine serous carcinoma in the Medicare population and to compare clinical outcomes in treated and untreated patients. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The impact of chemotherapy on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 2188 patients met study eligibility criteria. Stages I, II, III, and IV diseases accounted for 890 (41%), 174 (8%), 470 (21%), and 654 (30%) of the study population, respectively. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, both, or none, were administered as adjuvant therapy in 635 (29%), 536 (24%), 308 (14%), and 709 (32%) of the study population, respectively. Use of chemotherapy became more frequent over time. Over the study period, and after adjusting for race, time of diagnosis, SEER registry, marital status, stage, age, surgery, lymph node dissection, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity index, there was an association between receipt of radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67) and not receiving any treatment (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.01) and worst survival. Survival was not improved over time. CONCLUSION: Although adjuvant chemotherapy and combination treatment with chemotherapy and radiation were associated with improved survival in our model, there was no significant improvement in survival over time.

Racial disparities in treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of care and survival for African American and white women with high-grade endometrial cancer. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The effect of treatment modality on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 9,042 patients met study eligibility criteria. African Americans had definitive surgery (76.8% compared with 88.7%; P<.001) less frequently. There was no difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment between the groups. In the crude models for both all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality, African American women had an increased overall and disease-specific hazard of death compared with white women. The overall hazard ratio for African American women was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-1.7), and the disease-specific hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.6). Over the entire study period, after adjusting for stage, age, period of diagnosis, registry region, urban compared with rural setting, marital status, treatment, surgery, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, there was no association between race and lower disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 1-1.2; P=.06). CONCLUSION: African American women had lower cancer-specific and all-cause survival compared with white women. Controlling for treatment, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and histopathologic variables eliminated the difference between African American and white women in the disease-specific analysis.