RESUMEN
Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have a high risk of death from COVID-19. We evaluated the humoral and cell-mediated immune response to BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in HD patients, comparing HD with Poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) and HD with Polysulphone (PS). Samples were collected before vaccination (T0) and 14-days after the 2ndvaccine (T2) in a TG (TG, n = 16-Foggia) and in a VG (CG, n = 36-Novara). Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Ig were titrated in the cohort 2-weeks after the 2nddose of vaccine. In the Testing-Group, serum neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were assayed and PBMCs isolated from patients were thawed, counted and stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 IGRA stimulation tube set. All patients had a positive ab-response, except in a case. PMMA-patients had higher levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (p = 0.031); VG data confirmed these findings (p < 0.05). NAb evaluation: PMMA patients passed the positive cut-off value, while in PS group only only 1/8 patient did not respond. PMMA patients showed higher percentages of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/RBD-Ig after a complete vaccine schedule (p = 0.028). Interferon-gamma release: PMMA patients showed significantly higher release of IFNγ (p = 0.014). The full vaccination course provided sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 across the entire cohort, regardless of dialyzer type. After vaccination, PMMA patients show a better immune response, both humoral and cellular, at the end of the vaccination course than PS patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunidad Humoral , Polimetil Metacrilato , Diálisis Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Polimetil Metacrilato/química , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/métodos , Polímeros , SulfonasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few reports have addressed the change in renal replacement therapy (RRT) management in the Intensive care Units (ICUs) over the years in western countries. This study aims to assess the trend of dialytic practice in a 4.5-million population-based study of the northwest of Italy. METHODS: A nine-year survey covering all the RRT provided in the ICUs. Consultant nephrologists of the 26 Nephrology and Dialysis centers reported their activities in the years 2007, 2009, 2012, and 2015. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2015 the patients treated increased from 1042 to 1139, and the incidence of RRT from 254 to 263 cases/10^6 inhabitants. The workload for dialysis center was higher in the larger hub hospitals. RRT for acute kidney injury (AKI), continuation of treatment in chronically dialyzed patients, or extrarenal indications accounted for about the stable rate of 70, 25 and 5% of all RRT sessions, respectively. Continuous modality days increased from 2731 days (39.5%) in 2007 to 5076 (70.6%) in 2015, when the continuous+prolonged treatment days were 6880/7196 (95.6% of total days). As to RRT timing, in 2015 only the classical clinical criteria, and no K-DIGO stage were adopted by most Centers. As to RRT interruption, in 2015 urine volume was the first criterion. Implementation of citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for RRT patients significantly increased from 2.8% in 2007 to 30.9% in 2015, when it was applied in all 26 Centers. CONCLUSIONS: From 2007 to 2015, current practice has changed towards shared protocols, with increasing continuous modality and RCA implementation.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Cítrico , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Italia , Citratos , AnticoagulantesRESUMEN
Conceived and developed since 2001 at the Alba Center, Videodialysis (VD) was used initially to prevent dropout in prevalent PD patients by guiding them in performing dialysis (VD-Caregiver). Subsequently, its use was extended to the clinical follow-up of critical patients (VD-Clinical), problems relating to transport to the Center (VD-Transport), and since 2016 for training/retraining all patients (VD-Training). Since 2017 other Centers have employed VD using modalities analyzed in this paper. Methods: the paper reports the findings of an Audit (February 2021) of the Centers using VD on 31-12-2020. The Centers provided the following information: the characteristics of the patients using VD; the main and secondary reasons for using VD, considering nursing home (VD-NH) patients separately; VD outcomes: duration, drop-out, peritonitis, patient/caregiver satisfaction (minimum: 1 - maximum: 10). Results: VD, which began between 09-2017 and 12-2019, has been used in 6 Centers for 54 patients at 31-12-2020 (age:71.8±12.6 years - M:53.7% - CAPD:61.1% - Assisted PD:70.3%). The most frequent reason has been VD-Training (70.4%), followed by VD-Caregiver (16.7%), VD-NH (7.4%), VD-Clinical (3.7%), and VD-Transport (1.9%), with differences between Centers. VD-Training is used most with self-care patients (93.8% - p<0.05), while with patients on Assisted PD it is associated with secondary reasons (95.7% - p<0.02). VD-Training (duration: 1-4 weeks) has always been completed successfully. No peritonitis was reported; satisfaction was 8.4±1.4. Conclusion: videodialysis is a flexible, effective, safe, and valued tool that can be employed using various modalities depending on the choice of the Center and the complexity of the patient.
Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/etiología , Diálisis RenalRESUMEN
Creating an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is complicated by the gradual increase in the average age of patients initiating chronic haemodialysis treatment and by the greater prevalence of pathologies that impact the cardiovascular system. In the past, the choice of which vessels to use for the creation of the AVF was essentially based on the physical examination of the upper limbs. Current international guidelines suggest that a colour doppler ultrasound (DUS) should be performed to complete the physical examination. Similarly, vascular ultrasound is fundamental in the post-operative phase for appropriately monitoring the access. We have conducted a retrospective analysis on the use of DUS in clinical practice in our centre, in order to determine the repercussions on vascular access survival. To this end, we identified three phases, according to the methods that were used for pre-operative vascular evaluation and monitoring of the AVF, that saw the progressive integration of clinical and ultrasound parameters. The analysis of the data highlighted a statistically significant higher rate of survival for all vascular accesses, evaluated as a whole, and for distal AVFs, in the third phase, despite a greater percentage of patients over 75 (48% vs 28%). In conclusion, we believe that an approach integrating clinical and ultrasound evaluation is indispensable to identify the most suitable AVF site and guarantee its efficiency over time.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies addressing the anti-inflammatory properties of citrate dialysate enrolled patients in both hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), the latter not adjusted for adequate convective exchange. This is a potential source of confounding in that HDF itself has anti-inflammatory effects regardless of the buffer, and optimal clinical outcomes are related to the amount of convection. METHODS: To distinguish the merits of the buffer from those of convection, we performed a 6-month, prospective, randomized, crossover AB-BA study. Comparisons were made during the 3-month study period of on-line HDF with standard dialysate containing three mmol of acetic acid (OL-HDFst) and the 3-month of OL-HDF with dialysate containing one mmol of citric acid (OL-HDFcit). Primary outcome measure of the study was interleukin-6 (IL-6). Klotho, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fetuin and routine biochemical parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 47 patients (mean age 64 years, range 27-84 years) enrolled in 10 participating Nephrology Units. Convective volumes were around 25 L/session with 90 percent of sessions > 20 L and ß2-microglobulin reduction rate 76% in both HDFs. Baseline median IL-6 values in OL-HDFst were 5.6 pg/ml (25:75 interquartile range IQR 2.9:10.6) and in OL-HDFcit 6.6 pg/ml (IQR 3.4:11.4 pg/ml). The difference was not statistically significant (p 0.88). IL-6 values were lower during OL-HDFcit than during OL-HDFst, both when analyzed as the median difference of overall IL-6 values (p 0.02) and as the median of pairwise differences between the baseline and the 3-month time points (p 0.03). The overall hsCRP values too, were lower during OL-HDFcit than during OL-HDFst (p 0.01). Klotho levels showed a time effect (p 0.02) and the increase was significant only during OL-HDFcit (p 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Citrate buffer modulated IL-6, hsCRP and Klotho levels during high volume OL-HDF. These results are not attributable to differences in the dialysis technology that was applied and may suggest a potential biological effect of citrate on CKD-associated inflammatory state. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02863016.
Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración , Interleucina-6 , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ácido Cítrico , Hemodiafiltración/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis RenalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A considerable minority of patients on waiting lists for kidney transplantation either have no diagnosis (and fall into the subset of undiagnosed cases) because kidney biopsy was not performed or histological findings were non-specific, or do not fall into any well-defined clinical category. Some of these patients might be affected by a previously unrecognised monogenic disease. METHODS: Through a multidisciplinary cooperative effort, we built an analytical pipeline to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a clinical suspicion of a monogenic condition or without a well-defined diagnosis. Following the stringent phenotypical and clinical characterization required by the flowchart, candidates meeting these criteria were further investigated by clinical exome sequencing followed by in silico analysis of 225 kidney-disease-related genes. RESULTS: By using an ad hoc web-based platform, we enrolled 160 patients from 13 different Nephrology and Genetics Units located across the Piedmont region over 15 months. A preliminary "remote" evaluation based on well-defined inclusion criteria allowed us to define eligibility for NGS analysis. Among the 138 recruited patients, 52 (37.7%) were children and 86 (62.3%) were adults. Up to 48% of them had a positive family history for kidney disease. Overall, applying this workflow led to the identification of genetic variants potentially explaining the phenotype in 78 (56.5%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the importance of clinical exome sequencing as a versatile and highly useful, non-invasive tool for genetic diagnosis of kidney diseases. Identifying patients who can benefit from targeted therapies, and improving the management of organ transplantation are further expected applications.
Asunto(s)
Exoma , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Italia , Secuenciación del ExomaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of switching from ESA originators to biosimilars in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive HD patients receiving stable intravenous ESA doses, and who had not been transfused in the previous 6 months, from 12 non-profit Italian centers. Patients switched from originators to biosimilars (n = 163) were matched with those maintained on ESA originators (n = 163) using a propensity score approach. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary endpoint was the mean dose difference (MDD), defined as the difference between the switch and control groups of ESA dose changes during the study (time-weighted average ESA dose minus baseline ESA dose). RESULTS: Age (70 ± 13 years), male sex (63%), diabetes (29%), history of cardiovascular disease (40%), body weight (68 ± 14 kg), vascular access (86% arteriovenous fistula), hemoglobin [Hb] (11.2 ± 0.9 g/dL) and ESA dose (8504 ± 6370 IU/week) were similar in the two groups. Hb remained unchanged during the study in both groups. Conversely, ESA dose remained unchanged in the control group and progressively increased in the switch group from week 8 to 24. The time-weighted average of the ESA dose was higher in the switch group than in the control group (10,503 ± 7389 vs. 7981 ± 5858 IU/week; p = 0.001), leading to a significant MDD of 2423 IU/week (95% confidence interval [CI] 1615-3321), corresponding to a 39.6% (95% CI 24.7-54.6) higher dose of biosimilars compared with originators. The time-weighted average of Hb was 0.2 g/dL lower in the switch group, with a more frequent ESA hyporesponsiveness (14.7 vs. 2.5%). Iron parameters and other resistance factors remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In stable dialysis patients, switching from ESA originators to biosimilars requires 40% higher doses to maintain anemia control.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Diálisis Renal , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hierro/metabolismo , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Epoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/complicaciones , Anemia/metabolismo , Anemia Ferropénica/complicaciones , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia Ferropénica/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hierro/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Oligoelementos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acutely decompensated heart failure (HF) in patients with diuretic resistance is often treated with extracorporeal ultrafiltration. Peritoneal ultrafiltration (PUF) has been proposed for the long-term management of severe HF after resolution of the acute episode. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of PUF in the treatment of chronic refractory HF in patients without end-stage renal disease. ⢠METHODS: This multicenter (10 nephrology departments throughout Italy) retrospective observational study included patients with severe HF refractory to maximized drug treatment. The patients were proposed for PUF because they had experienced at least 3 hospital admissions in the preceding year for acutely decompensated HF requiring extracorporeal ultrafiltration. ⢠RESULTS: Of the 48 study patients (39 men, 9 women; mean age 74 ± 9 years), 30 received 1 nocturnal icodextrin exchange, 5 required 2 daily exchanges, and 13 received 2 - 4 sessions per week of automated peritoneal dialysis. During the first year, renal function remained stable (initial: 20.8 ± 10.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2); end: 22.0 ± 13.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), while pulmonary artery systolic pressure declined to 40 ± 6.09 mmHg from 45.5 ± 9.18 mmHg (p = 0.03), with a significant concomitant improvement in New York Heart Association functional status. Hospitalizations decreased to 11 ± 17 days/patient-year from 43 ± 33 days/patient-year before the start of PUF (p < 0.001). The incidence of peritonitis was 1 episode in 45 patient-months. Patient survival was 85% at 1 year and 56% at 2 years. ⢠CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the satisfactory results of using PUF for chronic HF in elderly patients.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hemofiltración , Diálisis Peritoneal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In recent years, the number of elderly uremic patients who commence renal replacement therapy has increased. A retrospective review assessed the survival rate and incidence of complications in elderly patients with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) created between January 2000 and August 2008. METHODS: A total of 78 patients, 48 men and 30 women aged ≥75 with a mean age of 82.5±7.5, commenced hemodialysis therapy during the period under consideration; 31% were diabetic and all had a LVEF ≥30%. For this group of patients, 90 AVF were created: 41 distal AVF (45%), 32 proximal AVF (35%), 13 midarm AVF (15%), and four AV grafts (5%). RESULTS: The survival rate of the AVF was 76% at 12 months and 71% at 24 months. A total of 47 patients with functioning AVF (60%) died during the study period. There were 18 cases of thrombosis (20%). No significant local or systemic complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Several aspects should be highlighted: pre-operative color-flow duplex scanning, timing of the creation of the AVF and placement of the AVF as distal as possible.The creation of AVF in elderly patients is a choice supported by the opinion that patients with tunneled central venous catheters have higher mortality rates than those with AVF. In summary, choosing vascular access sites to be created in elderly patients is no different than for younger patients-an AVF remains the gold standard.