Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Soc Psychiatry ; 70(3): 507-517, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38312065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Work functioning impairment is a key diagnostic and prognostic criterion in patients with psychiatric disorders and work inclusion is a major goal of their therapeutic pathway. Since 2009, the Regional Innovative Program (PIR) TR106, promoted by ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco of Milan in collaboration with other Departments of Mental Health and Addictions (DSMDs) in the town of Milan (Italy), has been developing the employment inclusion of psychiatric patients. AIMS: The objective of this study is to evaluate its outcomes over 8 years of observation. METHOD: We reported the results of a retrospective epidemiologic analysis on 2,142 interventions on 1,066 patients recruited, investigating PIR TR106 outcomes per year focusing on different subgroups. We focused on 'positive', 'negative', and 'other' outcomes. RESULTS: We preliminary calculated job maintenance interventions (5%, 107) and excluded these interventions from the overall. We observed 29 job firing (1.4%) and 15 job resignations (0.7%) as negative results (equal to 2.2% of the total) and 388 job hiring (16.6%), 647 traineeships (31.8%), and 413 work formation (20.3%) as positive outcomes (equal to 68.75%). In other outcomes (29.1%) we found 305 dismissals from PIR TR 106 (15%) and transitory outcomes (14.1%).Job hiring increased from 8.9% in 2012 to 23.8 % in 2019 (p < .001), while the dismissals diminished from 26.7% to 13.3% (p < .001). The effectiveness of traineeships in terms of job hiring increased in the ratio of annual job hiring versus job traineeship (+48.8%). The majority of hired patients (15.1%) were affected by a psychotic disorder. A significant hiring increase was observed in patients with psychotic disorders and personality disorders (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: PIR-TR106 represents a territorial employment inclusion program with progressively increasing effectiveness and specificity, as suggested by changes in outcomes during the 8-year observation. The adaptive capacity and sustainability of the intervention are worth further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Selección de Personal/métodos
2.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 39(3): e2893, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340275

RESUMEN

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic disease with a prevalence in the general population of around 2%-3%, generally accompanied by a severe impairment of functioning and quality of life. A consistent subgroup of patients may not achieve adequate symptom remission with first-line treatments (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]). The most validated option for treatment-resistant cases relies on the augmentative use of antipsychotics to SSRIs, preferably of the 'second generation'. Indeed, dopamine appears to be crucially involved in OCD neuropathology due to its implication in systems relating to goal-directed behaviour and maladaptive habits. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action of antipsychotics in OCD symptom improvement is still unclear. Risperidone, aripiprazole, and haloperidol seem to be the most useful medications, whereas 'first generation' antipsychotics may be indicated in case of comorbidity with tics and/or Tourette Syndrome. Antipsychotic augmentation may be also related to side-effects, particularly in the long term (e.g., alteration in metabolic profile, sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms). The present mini-review sought to provide the most updated evidence on augmentative antipsychotic use in treatment-resistant patients with OCD, providing a road map for clinicians in daily practice and shedding light on avenues for further research.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Humanos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada
3.
CNS Spectr ; 29(1): 60-64, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37753729

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted mental health across different groups, including healthcare workers (HWs). To date, few studies focused on potential positive aspects that may follow the exposure to the pandemic. We investigated the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Italian HWs and whether posttraumatic growth (PTG) dimensions affected the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) during the first COVID-19 wave. METHODS: An online self-report survey was conducted between April and May 2020. Sociodemographic data, information about COVID-19-related stressful events, Impact of the Event Scale-revised, and Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory-Short Form (PTGI-SF) scores were collected and compared between participants. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were also collected to assess SI through item 9. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between PTGI and SI. RESULTS: Among 948 HWs, 257 (27.0%) reported a provisional PTSD diagnosis. The median PTGI-SF score was 24. Participants reporting PTSD symptoms had higher scores in the Spiritual change, Appreciation of life, and New possibilities domains, and in the total PTG scale. A total of 100 HWs (10.8%) screened positive for SI. Improvements in Relating to others domain of PTGI-SF (odds ratioOR: .46; 95% confidence interval: .25-.85) were associated with lower odds of SI. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemic has been indicated as a risk factor for SI, also among HWs. PTG may have a protective role on suicide risk. Improvements in Relating to others domain reduced odds of SI, consistently with the role of loneliness and lack of connectedness with others in enhancing suicidal risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Crecimiento Psicológico Postraumático , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Ideación Suicida , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología
4.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 16(5): 453-465, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147189

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Immunoassay urine drug screen (UDS) is frequently used in clinical practice for initial screening process, being generally available, fast, and inexpensive. Exposure to widely prescribed drugs might determine false-positive UDS amphetamines, leading to diagnostic issues, wrong therapeutic choices, impairment of physician-patient relationship, and legal implications. AREAS COVERED: To summarize and comment on a comprehensive list of compounds responsible for UDS false positives for amphetamines, we conducted a literature review on PubMed along with a comparison with Real-World Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database analysis between 2010 and 2022. Forty-four articles and 125 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) involving false-positive amphetamine UDS in psychiatric patients were retrieved from FAERS. EXPERT OPINION: False-positive results were described in literature for antidepressants, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and antipsychotics, but also for non-psychiatric drugs of common use, such as labetalol, fenofibrate, and metformin. Immunoassay method is usually responsible for false-positive results, and in most cases, mass spectrometry (MS) does not eventually confirm the UDS positivity. Physicians should be aware of immunoassays' limitations and when turning to a confirmatory test. Any new cross-reaction should be reported to pharmacovigilance activities.


Asunto(s)
Farmacovigilancia , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Estados Unidos , Humanos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Anfetaminas/efectos adversos , Anfetaminas/orina , Inmunoensayo/métodos
5.
J Clin Med ; 12(5)2023 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36902649

RESUMEN

Post-traumatic growth (PTG) and specific traumatic events have been poorly explored in the literature focusing on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among healthcare workers (HWs) tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. In a large sample of Italian HWs, we investigated the kinds of traumatic events and whether PTG affects the risk of PTSD, along with its prevalence and features, during the first COVID-19 wave. COVID-19-related stressful events, Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and PTG Inventory-Short Form (PTGI-SF) scores were collected through an online survey. Out of 930 HWs included in the final sample, 257 (27.6%) received a provisional PTSD diagnosis based on IES-R scores. Events referring to the overall pandemic (40%) and to a threat to a family member (31%) were reported as the most stressful events. Female sex, previous mental disorders, job seniority, unusual exposure to sufferance and experiencing a threat to one's family significantly increased the provisional PTSD diagnosis' risk, while being a physician, the availability of personal protective equipment and moderate/greater scores on the PTGI-SF spiritual change domain were found to be protective factors.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA