Referral of District Level Operations to Regional Hospitals in South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: In South Africa, district hospitals have limited surgical capacity, and most surgical conditions are referred to higher-level facilities for definitive management. This study aims to identify the proportion, type, and volume of district-level general surgery referrals to two regional government hospitals in South Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data collected on persons who underwent general surgery operations at two South African regional hospitals between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. District-level operations were those included in the South African Department of Health District Health Package. Descriptive analyses were performed to determine the proportions of district-level general surgery referrals and operations. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with district-level general surgery operations. RESULTS: A total of 9357 persons underwent general surgery operations. Of these, 5925 (63.3%) were district-level operations. The most common district-level operations were lower limb amputations (n = 1007; 17.0%), abscess drainage (n = 936; 15.8 %), appendectomy (n = 791; 13.4%), non-trauma emergency laparotomy (n = 666; 11.2%), and inguinal hernia repair (n = 574; 9.7%). In multivariate analysis, district-level operations were associated with emergency conditions (OR: 5.64, P < 0.001), trauma (OR: 1.43, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR: 2.35, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In South Africa, the majority of general surgery diseases treated at regional hospitals are district-level conditions. The definition of district-level conditions could be too broad, and a narrower basket of surgical care for district hospitals would focus training efforts on achievable targets. More resources are needed at regional hospitals to care for their additional surgical burden.

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Absorbable Strap Fixation for Ventral Hernia Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Various mesh fixation methods are employed by surgeons during ventral hernia repair. These may include tacks, straps, sutures, glue, or a combination of methods. One of these choices is an absorbable fixation device, Securestrap® (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, New Jersey), consisting of an absorbable copolymer barbed U-shaped strap with a spring-loaded deployment system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry is a prospective multi-center registry, designed to collect longitudinal data on hernia repair methods, products, and outcomes. Patients complete the Carolinas Comfort Scale™ (CCS) (The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Charlotte, North Carolina) pre-operatively, and at one month, six months, and 12 months post-operatively. Symptomatic patients defined as responding >1 to any CCS™ question. Statistical comparison of symptom frequency was made with the McNemar test and Kaplan Meier methods to determine the recurrence rate up to 365 days. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled at 16 centers. Data was available on 100 of the 203 patients at six months and on 119 patients at 12 months. Demographics: mean age of 52.7 (13.2 standard deviation[ SD]); mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.2 (7.5 SD) kg/m2; 64.3% having a BMI over 30kg/m2; male patients 47.4%; 16.7% for recurrent hernias. Mesh fixation with straps alone in 48.3% of cases or straps and sutures in 51.7% of cases. Percentage of patients with symptomatic pain decreased slightly from baseline to one month (70.0 vs. 60.6, p=0.0782) and significantly from one month to six months (60.6% symptomatic vs. 23.2%; p=0.0004). From six months to twelve months, the change in percentage of symptomatic patients was not significant (23.2% vs. 28.7%; p=0.8084). Similar results were observed with symptomatic CCS™ movement limitations. Overall recurrence rate at 12 months was 4.72% (2.39%-9.22%). CONCLUSION: Mesh fixation with straps with or without additional sutures is associated with significant improvements in patient-reported pain and movement limitation from baseline to six months post-operative.