Factors Associated With Willingness to Use Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Black Cisgender Women Residing in Rural and Urban Areas: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Black cisgender women (CGW) are disproportionately impacted by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the United States. Black women account for 57% of the total new diagnoses among CGW. In addition, Black CGW women are 9 times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than their White counterparts. METHODS: We conducted surveys (September 2019-March 2020) and collected information on sociodemographics, HIV/preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) knowledge, HIV/PrEP stigma, sexual practices, and other factors identified as PrEP barriers among Black CGW (n = 795). This cross-sectional study used logistic regression models to assess intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural factors among individuals willing to use PrEP versus individuals unwilling or unsure to use PrEP. RESULTS: Our study population had a mean age of 37 years, predominantly lived in urban areas (65%), had stable housing (96.7%), and had private insurance/Medicare (78.2%). Overall, 29.6% reported willingness to use PrEP, 35.6% reported unwillingness to use PrEP, and 34.8% were unsure of PrEP use. The multivariable analysis showed that, compared with individuals reporting unwillingness/unsure to PrEP use, those reporting willingness to PrEP use were younger (adjusted odds ratio [AOR; 95% confidence interval {CI}], 0.97 [0.96-0.99]), had lower odds of intimate partner violence (AOR [95% CI], 0.87 [0.78-0.98), and had higher odds of organizational religiosity (AOR [95% CI], 1.10 [1.01-1.20]), HIV knowledge (AOR [95% CI], 1.08 [1.03-1.13]), and perceived need for PrEP (AOR [95% CI], 6.38 [3.36-12.11]). CONCLUSIONS: Preexposure prophylaxis willingness among Black CGW was impacted by individual-level, interpersonal, and structural factors. Improving PrEP willingness and uptake among Black CGW will require multilevel interventions.

Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are the 2 most frequently reported notifiable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States, and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), although not a notifiable disease, is the most common curable non-viral STI worldwide. Women bear a disproportionate burden of these infections and testing is necessary to identify infections. Although vaginal swabs are the recommended sample type, the specimen most often used among women is urine. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of commercially available assays for vaginal swabs vs urine specimens from women. METHODS: A systematic search of multiple databases from 1995 through 2021 identified studies that (1) evaluated commercially available assays, (2) presented data for women, (3) included data obtained from the same assay on both a urine specimen and a vaginal swab from the same patient, (4) used a reference standard, and (5) were published in English. We calculated pooled estimates for sensitivity and the corresponding 95% CIs for each pathogen as well as odds ratios for any difference in performance. RESULTS: We identified 28 eligible articles with 30 comparisons for CT, 16 comparisons for NG, and 9 comparisons for TV. Pooled sensitivity estimates for vaginal swabs and urine, respectively, were 94.1% and 86.9% for CT, 96.5% and 90.7% for NG, and 98.0% and 95.1% for TV (all P values <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this analysis supports the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendation that vaginal swabs are the optimal sample type for women being tested for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and/or trichomoniasis.

COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and perceived risk among pregnant and non-pregnant adults in Cameroon, Africa.

BACKGROUND: The public health response to the global COVID-19 pandemic has varied widely by region. In Africa, uptake of effective COVID-19 vaccines has been limited by accessibility and vaccine hesitancy. The aim of this study was to compare perceptions of COVID-19 infection and vaccination between pregnant women and non-pregnant adults in four regions of Cameroon, located in Central Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted at urban and suburban hospital facilities in Cameroon. Participants were randomly selected from a convenience sample of adult pregnant and non-pregnant adults in outpatient clinical settings between June 1st and July 14th, 2021. A confidential survey was administered in person by trained research nurses after obtaining written informed consent. Participants were asked about self-reported sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, perceptions of COVID-19 infection, and vaccination. Descriptive statistics were used for survey responses and univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were created to explore factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability. RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of participants were interested in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (31%, 257/835) and rates did not differ by pregnancy status. Overall, 43% of participants doubted vaccine efficacy, and 85% stated that the vaccine available in Africa was less effective than vaccine available in Europe. Factors independently associated with vaccine acceptability included having children (aOR = 1.5; p = 0.04) and higher education (aOR = 1.6 for secondary school vs primary/none; p = 0.03). Perceived risks of vaccination ranged from death (33%) to fetal harm (31%) to genetic changes (1%). Health care professionals were cited as the most trusted source for health information (82%, n = 681). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation in Cameroon was highly prevalent among pregnant and non-pregnant adults in 2021 while vaccine was available but not recommended for use in pregnancy. Based on study findings, consistent public health messaging from medical professionals about vaccine safety and efficacy and local production of vaccine are likely to improve acceptability.

PrEP service delivery preferences of black Cis-gender women living in the Southern United States.

To assess PrEP service delivery preferences among Black cis-gender women living in urban and rural settings in Alabama, we conducted a cross-sectional discrete choice experiment survey. Discrete choice experiments included five attributes. Hierarchical Bayes (HB) modeling and latent class analyses (LCA) were used to evaluate attribute preferences. Among 795 Black cis-gender HIV-negative women, almost two-thirds lived in urban settings and reported having at least some college; about a third reported a household income less than $25,000 annually; and reported willingness to use PrEP. Respondents placed the greatest importance on PrEP medication formulation and healthcare facility. LCA showed the group with the highest rural proportion preferred for on-line visits. Black women in the Deep South had distinct preferences regarding PrEP service delivery. These findings can inform tailored interventions to improve PrEP uptake among Black cis-gender women across diverse settings in the South.

Multicenter Comparison of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Diagnosis of Rectal and Oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections.

Research using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have repeatedly found rectal and oropharyngeal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to be common and potentially more difficult to treat than genital infections. Unfortunately, public health and patient care efforts have been hampered by the lack of FDA-cleared NAATs with claims for anorectal or oropharyngeal samples. At the time of the initiation of this study, no commercially available assays had these claims. We formed a novel partnership among academic institutions and diagnostic manufacturers to address this public health need. From May 2018 through August 2019, we recruited 1108 women, 1256 men, and 26 transgender persons each of whom provided 3 anal and 3 oropharyngeal swab specimens. The 3 anal swabs were pooled into a single transport tube as were the 3 oropharyngeal swabs. The performance of each of three study assays was estimated by comparison to the composite result and relative to one another. Percent positivity for chlamydia was 5.9 and 1.2% from anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively, compared to 4.2 and 4.1% for gonorrhea. Sensitivity for chlamydia detection ranged from 81.0 to 95.1% and 82.8 to 100% for anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. Gonorrhea sensitivity ranged from 85.9 to 99.0% and 74.0 to 100% for anal and oropharyngeal samples, respectively. Specificity estimates were ≥ 98.9% for all assays, organisms, and sample types. Although there was heterogeneity between sensitivity estimates, these assays offer better ability to detect extragenital infections than culture and potential solutions for providing appropriate sexual health care for populations in which these infections are of concern.

Patients Are Willing to Wait for Rapid Sexually Transmitted Infection Results in a University Student Health Clinic.

We examined the acceptability and feasibility of using a 30-minute chlamydia/gonorrhea test in a student health clinical setting. One hundred eight students were enrolled and 89.4% were willing to wait up to 20 minutes beyond the conclusion of their routine visit. The average amount of time added per clinic visit was less than 11 minutes. Patient and staff satisfaction were high.