Does Endometriosis Impact the Composition of Follicular Fluid in IL6 and AMH? A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare follicular liquid levels of IL6 and AMH in women with and without endometriosis and to evaluate their potential impact on ICSI outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a prospective case-control study conducted on 25 women with proven endometriosis and 50 patients diagnosed with other causes of infertility. All these patients were candidates for ICSI cycles. Their follicular fluid was collected at the time of oocyte retrieval and used to evaluate IL-6 and AMH titers by electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay (Cobas e411-Roche). RESULTS: The IL-6 levels in follicular fluid were higher in the endometriosis group than in the control group (152.3 vs. 19.9 pg/mL; p = 0.02). The median level for AMH was 2.2 ± 1.88 ng/mL with no statistical difference between the two groups (2.2 vs. 2.7 ng/mL, p = 0.41). No significant correlation between the follicular IL6 and AMH levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The oocyte quality seems to be preserved in patients with endometriosis with the adequate response to ovarian stimulation. High levels of follicular IL6 are in accordance with the inflammatory phenomenon of the disease; however, this increase has no impact on ICSI outcomes.

Evaluation of Triclosan coated suture in obstetrical surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study (NCT05330650).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of Triclosan coated suture in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) rate after caesarian delivery (CD). STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred eighty patients were randomly assigned to closure with polyglactin non coated suture VICRYL, or with polyglactin coated suture VICRYL Plus after caesarian section. The primary outcome was the rate of SSIs within 30 days after surgery and secondary outcomes were the rate of wound healing complications. RESULTS: SSI rate was 2.5% in Triclosan group compared to 8.1% with non-coated suture. Use of Triclosan coated suture (TCS) was associated with 69% reduction in SSI rate (p = 0.037; ORa:0.294; 95% CI:0.094-0.921). The use of Triclosan coated suture was associated with statistically lower risk of wound oedema (2.5% vs 10%), (p = 0.019; OR:0.595), dehiscence (3.8% vs 10.6%), (p = 0.023; OR:0.316) and hematoma (p = 0.035; OR:0.423). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the effectiveness of Triclosan coated suture in reducing SSI rate and wound healing disturbances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov / ID (NCT05330650).

Perurethral transvesical route for oocytes retrieval: an old technique for a new indication in oncofertility.

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the peruretheral transvesical oocyte retrieval in oncofertility. We conducted a retrospective comparative study in our assisted reproductive technologies center. STUDY GROUP: 28 pubertal young women affected by malignancies, referred for fertility preservation and refusing transvaginal (TV) procedure. CONTROL GROUP: 28 infertile patients, aged less than 25 years, who have undergone in vitro fertilization with TV oocyte retrieval. The ovarian stimulation was significantly longer on the study group. There was no difference between the two groups regarding mean number of collected metaphase II oocytes. One patient of the study group had a transient dysuria. These preliminary data suggest that, in oncofertility, peruretheral transvesical oocyte retrieval is an alternative when the TV route is refused or not feasible.

Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilization: Comparison of Vaginal and Rectal Pessaries to Vaginal Capsules: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: In IVF, Luteal phase support is usually performed using vaginal progesterone. A part of patients using this route reports being uncomfortable with this route. We tried to study whether the rectal route could be an effective alternative and associated with less discomfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study. All patient were eligible for IVF treatment for infertility. After oocyte pickup, 186 patients were allocated to one the following protocols for luteal phase support: (i) rectal pessaries group: natural progesterone pessaries administered rectally 200 mg three times a day, (ii) vaginal pessaries group: natural progesterone pessaries administered vaginally 200 mg three times a day), and (iii) vaginal capsules group: natural micronized progesterone capsules administered vaginally 200 mg three times a day. On the day of pregnancy test, patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire conducted by an investigator in order to assess the tolerability and side effects of the LPS treatment taken. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of perineal irritation. RESULTS: Fifty eight patients were assigned to the rectal pessaries group, 68 patients to the vaginal pessaries group, and 60 patients to the vaginal capsules group. All patients adhered to their allocated treatment. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates per transfer did not differ between the three groups. Perineal irritation, which was our primary endpoint, was the same for all the three groups (respectively 1.7 % versus 5.9 % versus 11.7%). Regarding the other side effects, more patients experienced constipation and flatulence with the rectal route, whereas more patients reported vaginal discharge in the vaginal capsules group. CONCLUSION: Rectal administration for luteal phase support is effective and well accepted alternative to vaginal route.

[Clinicals and biological aspects of ICSI cycles on patients with polycystic ovary syndrome]. / Aspects cliniques et biologiques de l'ICSI chez les femmes porteuses du syndrome des ovaires Polykystiques.

AIM: To analyse clinical et biological pecularities of Polycystics Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) patients enrolled on ICSI cycles and compare them to normo-ovulatory women. METHODS: 100 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for ICSI in women with PCOS and 200 cycles in normo-ovulatory women. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in term of cancellation rate (5.5% in PCOS group vs 5%; NS). The mean number of follicles was higher in patients with PCOS (18.1 +/- 8.5 vs 9.4 +/- 5.5; p < 0.05). Oocyte mature rate and fertilization rate were higher in PCOS group (67% vs 52%; p < 0.05) (75% vs 63.7%; p < 0.05) respectively. Grade 1 embryo rate was significantly higher in PCOS group (69% vs 53%; p < 0.05). Implantation rate (16.6% vs 12.1%; NS) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (31.5% vs 22.2%; NS) did not differ statistically in the two groups. Miscarriage rate was higher in PCOS group but this did not reach the statistical significance (20% vs 7.1%; NS). 11 cases of Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in PCOS group versus 4 on normo-ovulatory group. CONCLUSION: Use of ICSI as fertilization technique was correlated with good biologic parameters on PCOS patients with better fertilization rate and embryo quality and similar pregnancy rate comparing to normo-ovulatory women. However, it still be great concern about high risk of miscarriages and Hyperstimulation ovarian syndrome.

[Increased risk of early pregnancy loss and lower live birth rate with GNRH antagonist vs. long GNRH agonist protocol in PCOS women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation]. / Augmentation du taux de fausses couches spontanees precoces et diminution du taux de naissances vivantes avec le protocole antagoniste de la GNRH versus agoniste long chez les patientes porteuses d'un syndrome des ovaires polykystiques.

AIM: to compare standard long GnRH agonist protocol (Triptorelin) and GnRH antagonist regimens (Cetrorelix) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for ICSI cycles. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. 106 PCOS patients undergoing COS for ICSI with long GnRH agonist protocol (Triptorelin) were matched with age and BMI to 106 PCOS patients undergoing COS for ICSI with GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) during the same period. Ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) was used in the two groups. Oral contraceptive pill pretreatment was used in all patients undergoing ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonists. ICSI was performed for male infertility in all cases. The main outcome measures evaluated were: cancellation of the cycles, number of aspirated follicles, oocyte maturity, fertilization rate, Embryo quality, pregnancy and implantation rates, clinical abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate and the live birth rate rate. Kchi2 test and t Student test were used for differences between normo-ovulatory and PCOS patients and the limit of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in term of cancellation rate (2.8% vs 1.8%; NS). Duration of gonadotrophin stimulation (9.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 11.2 +/- 1.9 days; p < 0.001) and gonadotrophin consumption (2209.0 +/- 548.3 vs. 1411.1 +/- 217.9 UI: p < 0.001) were significantly decreased with GnRH antagonist. The mean oestradiol level on the triggering day was significantly higher in the agonist group (3347.85 +/- 99 vs. 2354.45 +/- 839; p < 0.001 ).A fall in LH level of > or = 50% from stimulation day 8 (S8) to S1 was observed in GnRH antagonist group. Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly decreased with GnRH antagonist (1.8% vs 10.7%; p = 0.01). The mean number of retrival oocytes (15.9 +/- 5.9 vs. 17.3 +/- 8.3; ns) and the mean number of mature oocytes (11.43 +/- 4.2 vs. 11.91 6.4; ns) were similar in the two groups, fertilization rate (73.3% vs 75.8%; NS), mean number of grade 1 and 2 embryos (6.3 +/- 2.7 vs. 6.9 +/- 3.9; NS), mean number of transferred embryos (1.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.7; NS), implantation rate (13.3% vs. 18.45%; ns) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (28.6% vs 31.1% ; NS) did not differ statistically in the two groups. Twin and triplet pregnancies rates were also similar in the two groups (7.1% vs. 9.3%; NS) and (3.5% vs. 3.1%; NS) respectively. Live birth rate (12.2% vs. 20.7%; p < 0.001) was significantly lower in GnRH antagonist group and miscarrage rate was significantly higher in this same group (42.8% vs. 18.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonist protocol is a short and simple protocol with a significant reduction in incidence of OHSS and amount of gonadotrophins. However, GnRH antagonist protocol provides a lower live birth rate and an increased risk of early pregnancy loss compared to the GnRH agonist long protocol. Further studies are necessary for more solid conclusions.