Clinical Characterization and Predictive Factors for Progression in a Cohort of Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Features of Autoimmunity: The Need for a Revision of IPAF Classification Criteria.

Background and Objectives: The "interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features" (IPAF) criteria have been criticized because of the exclusion of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patients with a single clinical or serological feature. To classify these patients, the term UIPAF was proposed. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics and predictive factors for progression of a cohort of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with at least one feature of autoimmunity, applying criteria for IPAF, specific connective tissue diseases (CTD), and a definition of UIPAF when possible. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data on 133 consecutive patients with ILD at onset associated with at least one feature of autoimmunity, referred by pulmonologists to rheumatologists from March 2009 to March 2020. Patients received 33 (16.5-69.5) months of follow-up. Results: Among the 101 ILD patients included, 37 were diagnosed with IPAF, 53 with ILD-onset CTD, and 11 with UIPAF. IPAF patients had a lower prevalence of UIP pattern compared to CTD-ILD and UIPAF patients (10.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 100%, p < 0.01). During the follow-up, 4 IPAF (10.8%) and 2 UIPAF (18.2%) patients evolved into CTD-ILD. IPAF patients presented features not included in IPAF criteria, such as sicca syndrome (8.1%), and were more frequently affected by systemic hypertension (p < 0.01). Over one year, ILD progression (greater extent of fibrosis on HRCT and/or decline in PFTs) was less frequent in the IPAF group compared to CTD-ILD and UIPAF (32.3% vs. 58.8% vs. 72.7, p = 0.02). A UIP pattern and an IPAF predicted a faster (OR: 3.80, p = 0.01) and a slower (OR: 0.28, p = 0.02) ILD progression, respectively. Conclusions: IPAF criteria help identify patients who might develop a CTD-ILD, even though a single clinical or serological feature is respected. Future revisions of IPAF criteria should include sicca syndrome and separate UIP-pattern into a different definition (UIPAF), given its association with a different prognosis, independently from ILD classification.

Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy mimicking a reactive arthritis: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (HOA) is a syndrome characterized by abnormal proliferation of skin and periosteal tissues of the extremities. It can be a rare hereditary disease (pachydermoperiostosis) or can be secondary to various diseases, though mostly lung malignancies. Here, we report an unusual clinical presentation of HOA. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old man presented with fever, diarrhea, and an oligoarthritis involving the left knee and the ankles. Since left knee synovial fluid aspiration revealed an aseptic synovitis and Clostridium Difficile toxin was detectable in stool samples, a reactive arthritis secondary to a Clostridium Difficile induced colitis was initially suspected. However, the presence of a worsened digital clubbing and the lack of a good clinical response to steroid therapy led us to perform a radionuclide bone scanning, which revealed HOA. This turned out to be associated with a lepidic predominant lung adenocarcinoma, which was clinically and radiologically difficult to distinguish from a relapse of pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the literature, HOA tends to have a variable clinical presentation, mimicking that of various rheumatic diseases. This clinical case shows that HOA can present as a presumptive acute reactive arthritis, and it highlights the importance of patient's follow-up in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, especially when a worsened digital clubbing is present.