Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA).

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS: After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Strategies Towards Improving Clinical Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate is an effective and safe second- or third-line treatment option for patients with low-grade advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). In this review, we will focus on possible extensions of the current use of PRRT and on new approaches which could further improve its treatment efficacy and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: Promising results were published regarding PRRT in other NENs, including lung NENs or high-grade NENs, and applying PRRT as neoadjuvant or salvage therapy. Furthermore, a diversity of strategic approaches, including dosimetry, somatostatin receptor antagonists, somatostatin receptor upregulation, radiosensitization, different radionuclides, albumin binding, alternative renal protection, and liver-directed therapy in combination with PRRT, have the potential to improve the outcome of PRRT. Also, novel biomarkers are presented that could predict response to PRRT. Multiple preclinical and early clinical studies have shown encouraging potential to advance the clinical outcome of PRRT in NEN patients. However, at this moment, most of these strategies have not yet reached the clinical setting of randomized phase III trials.

Optimal Timing of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We developed a model predicting the probability of detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 419 consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence (prostate specific antigen less than 2.0 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy who underwent 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to guide salvage therapy. Patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy between radical prostatectomy and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography were excluded from the study. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. We minimized overfitting of the model and used decision curve analysis to determine clinical utility. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen at scanning was 0.40 ng/ml (IQR 0.30-0.70). Overall 174 (42%) patients had prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa. Prostate specific antigen at time of scanning, and grade group, N stage and surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy specimen were significant predictors for detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa. The bootstrapped AUC of this model was 0.75 (IQR 0.73-0.77). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit by a model based probability from 16%. Limitations include the retrospective design and the missing histological correlation of positive lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Next to the prostate specific antigen at time of scanning, grade group, N stage and surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy specimen are significant predictors for detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. The presented model is implemented in a dashboard to assist clinicians in determining the optimal time to perform 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate in patients with bronchial and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

PURPOSE: Therapy with [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate is effective in patients with grade I/II metastasized and/or inoperable bronchial neuroendocrine tumour (NET) or gastroenteropancreatic NET (GEP-NET). In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of salvage treatment with [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate. METHODS: Patients with progressive bronchial NET or GEP-NET were selected for re-(re)treatment if they had benefited from initial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (I-PRRT) with a minimal progression-free survival (PFS) of 18 months. Patients received an additional cumulative dose of 14.8 GBq of [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate over two cycles per retreatment with PRRT (R-PRRT) or re-retreatment with PRRT (RR-PRRT). RESULTS: The safety and efficacy analyses included 181 patients and 168 patients, respectively, with bronchial NET or GEP-NET. Overall median follow-up was 88.6 months (95% CI 79.0-98.2). Median cumulative doses were 44.7 GBq (range 26.3-46.4 GBq) during R-PRRT (168 patients) and 59.7 GBq (range 55.2-≤60.5 GBq) during RR-PRRT (13 patients). Objective response and stable disease, as best response, were observed in 26 patients (15.5%) and 100 patients (59.5%) following R-PRRT, and in 5 patients (38.5%) and 7 patients (53.8%) following RR-PRRT, respectively. Median PFS was 14.6 months (95% CI 12.4-16.9) following R-PRRT and 14.2 months (95% CI 9.8-18.5) following RR-PRRT. Combined overall survival (OS) after I-PRRT plus R-PRRT and RR-PRRT was 80.8 months (95% CI 66.0-95.6). Grade III/IV bone marrow toxicity occurred in 6.6% and 7.7% of patients after R-PRRT and RR-PRRT, respectively. Salvage therapy resulted in a significantly longer OS in patients with bronchial NET, GEP-NET and midgut NET than in a nonrandomized control group. The total incidence of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was 2.2%. No PRRT-related grade III/IV nephrotoxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: A cumulative dose of up to 60.5 GBq salvage PRRT with [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate is safe and effective in patients with progressive disease (relapse-PD) following I-PRRT with [177Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate. Safety appears similar to that of I-PRRT as no higher incidence of AML or MDS was observed. No grade III/IV renal toxicity occurred after retreatment.

Recent developments in the diagnosis and therapy of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours.

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of the digestive tract are being increasingly detected, which is partly explained by the increased use of endoscopic and cross-sectional imaging as well as improved recognition at histopathological evaluation. After the discovery of this relatively indolent type of epithelial malignancy over 100 years ago, their sporadic occurrence and divergent biological behaviour at multiple primary sites have hampered dedicated studies into NET pathogenesis and testing of drug efficacy in well-designed clinical trials. The last decade, however, has seen significant improvements in the NET field regarding our understanding of their pathophysiology. This has been substantiated by novel and exciting diagnostic and therapeutic options, including superior positron emission tomography imaging, treatment with unlabelled and radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. This review summarises contemporary studies within NET patients, which have enriched our clinical repertoire for this disease and have been instrumental in securing a remarkable improvement of overall survival within recent years.