RESUMEN
Hallux valgus is a common progressive forefoot deformity. Although open techniques have shown good outcomes, no technique has been shown to be superior to other techniques. The current third generation of minimally invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) technique features a percutaneous procedure with a stable internal fixation. The technique used in this study resulted in stable internal fixation; however, 1 screw was used in intramedullary fashion in the majority of cases. The purpose of this study is to review the early outcomes of MICA. Electronic Health Records (EHR) were queried for patients who underwent MICA to treat hallux valgus (HV) deformity, by a single surgeon. The primary clinical outcomes assessed were visual analog pain score (VAS), rate of revision surgery, and recurrence. Radiographic outcomes were assessed including pre and postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and bony foot width. The secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. A total of 91 feet underwent MICA to correct symptomatic HV deformity. The mean age of this cohort was 53.63 ± 15.42 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.81 ± 6.21 kg/m2, mean follow-up of 6.33 ± 6.39 months and 87 feet belonged to female patients. Patients showed significant improvement in VAS and radiographic outcomes at final follow-up, with a mean improvement of 10.70° ± 6.42°, 2.39° ± 3.55°, and 5.30 mm ± 4.23 mm for the HVA, IMA, and bony foot width, respectively. Two patients (2.2%) required revision surgery for nonunion and removal of symptomatic hardware. One patient had a second metatarsal fracture treated nonoperatively. No feet had recurrence, hardware loosening, infection, or scar hypersensitivity. The current study reported on early outcomes for MICA. This technique appears to be effective and safe with no failure of fixation in our patients. We showed in our short-term follow-up, MICA led to significant improvement in pain and radiographic scores.Levels of Evidence: III, retrospective study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Abnormalities in intervertebral rotation and translation are important to diagnosis and treatment planning for common spinal disorders. Tests that do not sufficiently load the spine can result in mis-diagnosed motion abnormalities. Upright flexion and extension x-rays are commonly used despite known limitations. Additional evidence is needed in support of preliminary studies suggesting that the change from standing to supine may sufficiently stress the spine to diagnose motion abnormalities. PURPOSE: Compare intervertebral translation between flexion and extension to translation between upright and supine positions in a representative clinical population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective analysis of images retrospectively collected from routine clinical practices. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval for analysis of previously obtained images, patients were identified via chart reviews where a neutral-lateral x-ray and an MRI or CT exam were obtained for diagnosis of a spinal disorder and where flexion-extension x-rays had been obtained to help diagnose abnormal intervertebral motion. The mid-sagittal slice from the MRI or CT exam was paired with the neutral-lateral radiograph. Intervertebral translation at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels between supine and standing and between flexion and extension were measured from the images using previously validated methods. The translations were classified as normal or abnormal with reference to a previously obtained database of intervertebral motion in radiographically normal and asymptomatic volunteers. RESULTS: At the L5-S1 level in particular, there tended to be greater translation between the supine and standing than between upright flexion and extension. On average, translations were below that found in asymptomatic volunteers. No abnormal translations were detected from flexion-extension radiographs whereas approximately 7% of levels had abnormal translations between supine and upright positions. CONCLUSIONS: Intervertebral translations between supine and standing, measured using the mid-sagittal slice from a MRI or CT exam and a lateral x-ray with the patient standing can help to identify abnormal motion. This would be particularly valuable for patients with limited flexion and extension. This study thereby adds to the evidence in support of measuring intervertebral motion between the supine and upright positions to detect abnormal intervertebral motion.