RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To describe the 3- and 5-year outcomes of an inception cohort of Australian children with JIA for whom 1-year outcomes have previously been published. METHODS: Data regarding clinical outcomes of the original cohort of 134 patients at 3 and 5 years were sought. Relevant clinical features and medication exposures entered prospectively into an electronic record were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data were available for 110 and 98 patients at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The proportion of patients with active joints progressively decreased from 34% at 12 months to 21% at 3 years and 16% at 5 years. Cumulative exposure to methotrexate increased between 3 and 5 years (75%-80%), however, point prevalence use decreased (45%-41%). Cumulative exposure and point prevalence use of bDMARDS both increased between 3 and 5 years; 30%-42% and 29%-33%, respectively. Thirty-five percent of patients had inactive joint disease off medications at 5 years, which occurred most frequently in patients with sJIA and oligoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Five-year outcomes of Australian children with JIA are good, with only a small minority having ongoing active joint disease at 5 years. bDMARDS play an increasing role in management over time; however, methotrexate use remains significant. A majority of children remain on medications at 5 years.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Metotrexato , Humanos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Juvenil/epidemiología , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Niño , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Australia/epidemiología , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Prospectivos , Adolescente , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
AIM: This study aimed to examine the transition process of paediatric rheumatology patients from the Monash Children's Hospital (MCH) in Melbourne in order to identify areas that could be improved. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical data from the rheumatology database of paediatric rheumatology patients eligible for transition between January 2015 and September 2020. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients were included; 57 patients were transitioned. Of patients transitioned to an adult service, 38 (88%) were on medication and 14 (33%) had active disease. All patients transitioned to the general practitioner (GP) had inactive disease off medication. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (non-systemic) was the most common diagnosis in patients transitioned. The mean age at which transition was first discussed was 18.0 years; the first referral was made at a mean of 18.3 years. The mean age at the first adult appointment was 18.5 years. Thirty-nine (91%) patients had a referral completed and 8 (19%) had a transfer letter. Thirteen (93%) patients transferred to the GP had a transfer letter. Transfer documents to an adult public rheumatology service rated 4.3 for quality, compared to 5.5 to the GP. Transfer of care was confirmed in 40 (93%) patients transitioned to an adult service; however, correspondence was available for only 3 (7%). CONCLUSION: Although the transition process at MCH was adequate, it could be improved through earlier discussion of the process and improved referrals and documentation. A readiness-to-transfer checklist and a young adult clinic have the potential to improve the process of transition to adult rheumatology care.
Asunto(s)
Reumatología , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Transición a la Atención de Adultos , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Australia , Niño , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivación y Consulta , Hospitales Pediátricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The advent of new treatments for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) has prompted interest in systematically studying the outcomes of patients treated in the 'modern era'. Such data provide both benchmarks for assessing local outcomes and important information for use in counselling families of newly diagnosed patients. While data are available for cohorts in Europe and North America, no such data exist for Australian patients. The aim was to examine the demographics, treatment and outcomes at 12 months of an inception cohort of newly diagnosed patients with JIA at a single tertiary referral paediatric rheumatology centre in Australia. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients newly diagnosed with JIA between 2010 and 2014 at the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne. RESULTS: One hundred thirty four patients were included (62% female). Oligoarthritis was the single largest category of JIA (36%) and rheumatoid factor positive polyarthritis the least common (2%). Undifferentiated JIA accounted for 13% of patients and was the third largest category. Across the cohort 94% received NSAIDs, 53% oral steroids, 62% methotrexate and 15% a biologic DMARD. Intra-articular steroids were used in 62%, most commonly in the oligoarticular subtype (94%). 95% of patients achieved a joint count of zero at a median of 4.1 months, however flares occurred in 42%. At 12 months 65% had no active joint disease, though more than half remained on medication. CONCLUSION: Australian children with JIA managed in the modern era have similar characteristics and achieve short term outcomes comparable to cohorts in Europe and North America, with high rates of joint remission in the first 12 months of follow-up but with a significant relapse rate and requirement for ongoing medication.