BRAF V600E Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Presenting With a Skull Base Metastasis and Pituitary Adenoma Collision Tumour.

We report an unusual initial presentation for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) with progressive loss of vision, a rare molecular phenotype and rapid visual response to surgical resection. A 60-year-old female presented with rapid and progressive visual loss over four weeks. Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI scans showed an enhancing lobulated mass in the base of skull infiltrating into the sella turcica. The patient underwent transnasal endoscopic debulking of the mass with rapid improvement in her vision. Histology showed a collision tumour with a pituitary adenoma and a microacinar metastatic adenocarcinoma. Staging CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis showed a T4 N2 M1 right LAC. Molecular profiling of the metastasis confirmed an activating mutation involving codon 600 of BRAF gene (BRAF V600E). The patient was treated with combination chemotherapy but rapidly deteriorated and unfortunately died due to progressive disease. Efforts to access BRAF/MEK inhibitors for off-label use were unsuccessful. We believe our patient would have benefited from a BRAF/MEK inhibitor. This case illustrates the very unusual presentation of metastatic LAC with visual loss secondary to a collision tumour containing a pituitary adenoma and metastatic adenocarcinoma.

SDHC epi-mutation testing in gastrointestinal stromal tumours and related tumours in clinical practice.

The enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) functions in the citric acid cycle and loss of function predisposes to the development of phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumour (wtGIST) and renal cell carcinoma. SDH-deficient tumours are most commonly associated with a germline SDH subunit gene (SDHA/B/C/D) mutation but can also be associated with epigenetic silencing of the SDHC gene. However, clinical diagnostic testing for an SDHC epimutation is not widely available. The objective of this study was to investigate the indications for and the optimum diagnostic pathways for the detection of SDHC epimutations in clinical practice. SDHC promoter methylation analysis of 32 paraffin embedded tumours (including 15 GIST and 17 PPGL) was performed using a pyrosequencing technique and correlated with SDHC gene expression. SDHC promoter methylation was identified in 6 (18.7%) tumours. All 6 SDHC epimutation cases presented with SDH deficient wtGIST and 3/6 cases had multiple primary tumours. No case of constitutional SDHC promoter hypermethylation was detected. Whole genome sequencing of germline DNA from three wtGIST cases with an SDHC epimutation, did not reveal any causative sequence anomalies. Herein, we recommend a diagnostic workflow for the detection of an SDHC epimutation in a service setting.

Translating in vivo metabolomic analysis of succinate dehydrogenase deficient tumours into clinical utility.

PURPOSE: Mutations in the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) subunit genes are associated with a wide spectrum of tumours including phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) 1, 2, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) 3, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 and pituitary adenomas5. SDH-related tumorigenesis is believed to be secondary to accumulation of the oncometabolite succinate. Our aim was to investigate the potential clinical applications of MRI spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in a range of suspected SDH-related tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were recruited to this study. Respiratory-gated single-voxel 1H-MRS was performed at 3T to quantify the content of succinate at 2.4 ppm and choline at 3.22 ppm. RESULTS: A succinate peak was seen in six patients, all of whom had a germline SDHx mutation or loss of SDHB by immunohistochemistry. A succinate peak was also detected in two patients with a metastatic wild-type GIST (wtGIST) and no detectable germline SDHx mutation but a somatic epimutation in SDHC. Three patients without a tumour succinate peak retained SDHB expression, consistent with SDH functionality. In six cases with a borderline or absent peak, technical difficulties such as motion artefact rendered 1H-MRS difficult to interpret. Sequential imaging in a patient with a metastatic abdominal paraganglioma demonstrated loss of the succinate peak after four cycles of [177Lu]-DOTATATE, with a corresponding biochemical response in normetanephrine. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated the translation into clinical practice of in vivo metabolomic analysis using 1H-MRS in patients with SDH-deficient tumours. Potential applications include non-invasive diagnosis and disease stratification, as well as monitoring of tumour response to targeted treatments.

SDHA related tumorigenesis: a new case series and literature review for variant interpretation and pathogenicity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of germline SDHA mutation analysis by (1) comprehensive literature review, (2) description of novel germline SDHA mutations and (3) in silico structural prediction analysis of missense substitutions in SDHA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review and a retrospective review of the molecular and clinical features of patients identified with putative germline variants in UK molecular genetic laboratories was performed. To evaluate the molecular consequences of SDHA missense variants, a novel model of the SDHA/B/C/D complex was generated and the structural effects of missense substitutions identified in the literature, our UK novel cohort and a further 32 "control missense variants" were predicted by the mCSM computational platform. These structural predictions were correlated with the results of tumor studies and other bioinformatic predictions. RESULTS: Literature review revealed reports of 17 different germline SDHA variants in 47 affected individuals from 45 kindreds. A further 10 different variants in 15 previously unreported cases (seven novel variants in eight patients) were added from our UK series. In silico structural prediction studies of 11 candidate missense germline mutations suggested that most (63.7%) would destabilize the SDHA protomer, and that most (78.1%) rare SDHA missense variants present in a control data set (ESP6500) were also associated with impaired protein stability. CONCLUSION: The clinical spectrum of SDHA-associated neoplasia differs from that of germline mutations in other SDH-subunits. The interpretation of the significance of novel SDHA missense substitutions is challenging. We recommend that multiple investigations (e.g. tumor studies, metabolomic profiling) should be performed to aid classification of rare missense variants before genetic testing results are used to influence clinical management.