Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 5: 4, 2005 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15667662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the field of clinical mycobacteriology, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) can be a difficult organism to manipulate due to the restrictive environment of a containment level 3 (CL3) laboratory. Tests for rapid diagnostic work involving smears and molecular methods do not require CL3 practices after the organism has been rendered non-viable. While it has been assumed that after organism deactivation these techniques can be performed outside of a CL3, no conclusive study has consistently confirmed that the organisms are noninfectious after the theoretical 'deactivation' steps. Previous studies have shown that initial steps (such as heating/chemical fixation) may not consistently kill MTB organisms. METHODS: An inclusive viability study (n = 226) was undertaken to determine at which point handling of culture extraction materials does not necessitate a CL3 environment. Four different laboratory protocols tested for viability included: standard DNA extractions for IS6110 fingerprinting, crude DNA preparations for PCR by boiling and mechanical lysis, protein extractions, and smear preparations. For each protocol, laboratory staff planted a proportion of the resulting material to Bactec 12B medium that was observed for growth for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 208 isolates initially tested, 21 samples grew within the 8-week period. Sixteen (7.7%) of these yielded positive results for MTB that included samples of: deactivated culture resuspensions exposed to 80 degrees C for 20 minutes, smear preparations and protein extractions. Test procedures were consequently modified and tested again (n = 18), resulting in 0% viability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it cannot be assumed that conventional practices (i.e. smear preparation) or extraction techniques render the organism non-viable. All methodologies, new and existing, should be examined by individual laboratories to validate the safe removal of material derived from MTB to the outside of a CL3 laboratory. This process is vital to establish in house biosafety-validated practices with the aim of protecting laboratory workers conducting these procedures.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Contención de Riesgos Biológicos/normas , Viabilidad Microbiana , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Contención de Riesgos Biológicos/métodos , Dermatoglifia del ADN , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Salud Laboral , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 47(3): 503-9, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14596969

RESUMEN

Continuous monitoring systems for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are reported to have higher contamination rates than traditional radiometric technologies. Multiple decontamination methods have recently been reported in an attempt to optimize contamination rates for these systems. In this study, several decontamination methods for sputum were evaluated using viable colony count and flow cytometry. The decontamination protocols evaluated include N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine-Sodium Hydroxide (NALC-NaOH), modified Petroffs's method, and the Yamane procedure. Several parameters of the NALC-NaOH method were analyzed including final NaOH concentrations of 0.5-3%, NaOH exposure times of 0-30 min, and variations in resuspension media for the resultant pellet. All decontamination methods were performed on pooled and sterilized sputum seeded separately with either a mixture of common contaminating bacteria or M. tuberculosis H37Ra. Viability of organisms following decontamination was assessed by both colony counts and flow cytometric analysis. Flow cytometry viability assays utilized a combination of viability dyes and reference beads to determine viable organism concentrations. The results indicated that no decontamination method was clearly superior, however a concentration of 1-2% NaOH and an increase in the time of NaOH exposure to 30 min will effectively kill contaminating bacteria without significantly affecting the viability of M. tuberculosis H37Ra. While flow cytometry viability analysis did not directly correspond to viable colony counts, it was a useful tool for rapid viability analysis M. tuberculosis.


Asunto(s)
Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Hidróxido de Sodio/farmacología , Esputo/microbiología , Análisis de Varianza , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Humanos , Probabilidad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA