The Ideal Donor Site Dressing: A Comparison of a Chitosan-Based Gelling Dressing to Traditional Dressings.

Donor site wound management is critical in split-thickness skin graft surgeries. These sites typically recover in 7 to 14 days due to the dermal-imbedded keratinocytes that promote skin regeneration. An ideal donor site dressing can help to mitigate pain, reduce infection risk, promote hemostasis, and accelerate healing times. Additionally, this dressing would be easy to apply in the operating room, easily managed, and cost-effective. Chitosan-based gelling dressings (CBGD) possess many of these qualities that make an ideal donor site dressing. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received CBGD as part of their postoperative wound care plan. We collected data on infections, hemostasis, dressing failure, and hospital course over a 14-month period where CBGD was used as the donor site dressing. One hundred and fourteen patients were evaluated. We found an infection rate of 7%, a bleed-through rate of 1.8%, and a re-application rate of 9.6%. The average CBGD cost per patient was $75.15. CBGD has acceptable infection rates, and pain scores as traditional donor site dressings. However, it possesses several qualities of a suitable donor site dressing notably swift healing rates, impressive hemostatic property, and low cost. Our study supports the idea that CBGD is a suitable donor site dressing for split-thickness skin graft surgeries.

Open-to-Air Is a Viable Option for Initial Wound Care in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection that Allows Early Detection of Recurrence without Need for Painful Dressing Changes or Return to Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) includes extensive surgical debridement. Care of these debridements is challenging because of the size of the wound and associated pain. A potential solution is to leave the wounds open-to-air in the period after the initial debridement, allowing for regular inspection at bedside while reducing pain associated with frequent dressing changes. We evaluated the feasibility of this approach from a pain control standpoint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An audit of wound care modalities used on adult patients with NSTI admitted to a regional burn center between January 2009 and May 2014 was performed. Patients with at least one operation were included. Those opting for palliative care were excluded. Wound care was divided into four categories: open-to-air (OTA), negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), packing, and ointment. Wound care, pain score, pain medication use, and number of operations were collected for the first seven days after initial debridement. Pain management was assessed by pain scores. Analgesic use was measured and compared using conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included; 67% were men with average age of 50 years, resulting in a total of 672 days of wound care evaluated: 69 days of OTA, 127 days of NPWT, 200 days of packing, and 126 days of ointment (150 days were undocumented). Average daily pain score from all wound care modalities was 2.00. Negative pressure wound therapy had the highest reported daily pain score (2.18, p = 0.034), whereas OTA had the lowest pain score (1.63, p < 0.05). Mortality was lower in the OTA cohort but was not statistically significant; there were no other differences in long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Leaving wounds OTA is a safe and viable option in the immediate post-debridement period of NSTI to reduce pain, while permitting frequent re-evaluation for quick recognition of disease progression and repeat operative debridement if necessary.