Bilateral salpingectomy as an option of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section: A survey of practice.

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during benign gynaecologic surgery is advocated as a risk-reducing strategy due to the inverse association of epithelial ovarian cancers observed in epidemiological studies in a low-risk setting. Currently, no formal guidance exists for permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section in Australia. AIMS: Our aim was to survey Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) regarding bilateral salpingectomy compared to other procedures offered for permanent contraception at the time of caesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was utilised to collect clinician demographics, opinions, barriers, and justifications in regard to options of permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section. RESULTS: Bilateral salpingectomy was identified as the most effective method of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section. However, only 62% of respondents offer the procedure as a method of permanent contraception. The two most common reasons for clinicians to offer bilateral salpingectomy at time of caesarean section were evidence suggesting a link between the fallopian tube and gynaecological cancer (80%) and efficacy as a permanent form of contraception (16%). The primary barrier identified by 51% of respondents was perceived increased risk of surgical complications, followed by reasoning that it would not allow the possibility of future tubal reversal. CONCLUSION: This study identifies diverse opinions on surgical approach to permanent contraception at time of caesarean section and offered by clinicians of RANZCOG. Further research is required to establish safety profiles and short- and long-term risks of bilateral salpingectomy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy at robotic-assisted hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

Lymph node (LN) evaluation in endometrial cancer is controversial. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows for an accurate nodal assessment while minimising the risks of a full pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). The aims of this study are to examine the characteristics and peri-operative outcomes of women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) ± SLNB or PLND; to examine the utilisation, feasibility and role of SLNB and compare their peri-operative outcomes. Retrospective cohort study from December 2018 to February 2021 of women who underwent RAH ± LN assessment for endometrial cancer or AH. 115 women underwent RAH. 59% had SLNB, 29% had no LN assessment, and 12% had PLND. The final diagnosis was mostly early stage low-grade disease; Stage 1A-50%, Grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC)-56%. The detection rate was 90%. There was a statistically significant trend towards performing SLNB over time (P value 0.004). There was a statistically shorter length of stay, less estimated blood loss, and shorter surgical duration in the SLNB cohort, compared to the no LN assessment cohort (P values 0.02, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively). There was statistically significant less estimated blood loss and surgical duration in the SLNB compared to the PLND cohort (P values 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). SLNB at RAH was utilised and feasible. It was safe with a low complication rate and had advantages compared to PLND cohort. SLNB should be considered in suitable selected women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer or AH.

The utilisation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer in Australia and New Zealand.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify to what extent the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is utilised by gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand, identifying the techniques used, any barriers to uptake, and management of isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and micrometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an online survey of all practising gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand. They were asked whether they utilised SLN biopsy and in what circumstances, how they managed non-mapping and how their multidisciplinary team managed small volume disease. Those who did not were asked to identify their concerns with the procedure, reasons for non-uptake and their alternate technique. RESULTS: We surveyed 63 gynaecological oncologists of whom 59 were practising, and 48 (81%) responded. Six members (11%) do not utilise SLN biopsy, and 42 (89%) do. Areas where clinicians differ in practice are those areas that are most controversial and include the use of SLN biopsy in complex atypical hyperplasia, the management of ITCs and micrometastases and procedures on unilateral or bilateral non-mapping. Those who do not utilise the technique cite concerns about the false-negative rate, equipment and training issues. CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer is well established in Australia and New Zealand, with similar practices and concerns to those of other international groups.

Clinical Trial Protocol for HyNOVA: Hyperthermic and Normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following interval cytoreductive surgery for stage III epithelial OVArian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer (ANZGOG1901/2020).

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, causing over 200,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Initial standard treatment for primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) preceded and/or followed by intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most women develop recurrence within the peritoneal cavity and die of disease. Results of the OVIHIPEC 1 trial (2018) showed improved survival of 34% when hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was given immediately following interval-CRS in women with stage III disease. However, it is unknown if the effect of HIPEC is due to hyperthermia, one extra cycle of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, or other factors. There is also concern that hyperthermia might be associated with an increase in adverse events (AEs) due to a heightened systemic inflammatory response. HyNOVA is a seamless, multi-stage randomized study that attempts to answer these questions by comparing HIPEC to normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), focusing on safety (stage 1), then assessing activity (stage 2) and effectiveness (stage 3). In this initial study, we hypothesize that NIPEC will result in a lower rate of severe AEs compared to HIPEC. METHODS: This initial stage of HyNOVA is a phase II study of 80 women with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, with at least stable disease following 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieving interval-CRS to <2.5 mm residual disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive IP cisplatin 100 mg/m² for 90 minutes either as HIPEC, heated to 42°C (41.5°C-42.5°C), or NIPEC, at 37°C (36.5°C-37.5°C). The primary outcome is the proportion of AEs ≥ grade 3 occurring within 90 days. Secondary outcomes are AE of interest, surgical morbidity, patient reported outcomes, resource allocation, feasibility, progression-free survival and overall survival. AEs are measured using both CTCAE v5.0 and Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly infection, pain, bowel dysfunction, and anemia. Tertiary outcomes are potential predictive biomarkers measured before and after HIPEC/NIPEC including circulating cell-free tumor DNA, tissue factors, and systemic inflammatory markers. There are 4 participating Australian sites with experience in CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. HyNOVA is funded by an MRFF grant (APP1199155). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621000269831.

HIPEC: Turning up the heat on ovarian cancer.

Clinical trials of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC ) for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer are showing promising survival outcomes. HIPEC has the potential to eliminate ovarian cancer cells from peritoneal surfaces more effectively than systemic chemotherapy through enhanced pharmacokinetic and hyperthermia effects. However, many questions remain to be answered, particularly regarding the true place of HIPEC in the current era of new and effective targeted treatments. Concerns around the potential for increased morbidity, adverse effects on quality of life, and increased resource use following HIPEC use, can only be properly evaluated with ongoing high-quality clinical trials.

Referral patterns for genetic counselling of women diagnosed with tubo-ovarian or peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) within the Auckland Gynaecological Oncology Centre.

BACKGROUND: Germline BRCA1/2 mutations account for approximately 15% of invasive ovarian carcinomas. Referral of all women with non-mucinous epithelial tubo-ovarian and peritoneal cancer, especially high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) to genetic services for genetic counselling and subsequent BRCA testing, has become standard of care in many countries. Publicly funded BRCA testing was restricted to women ≤70 years old with HGSC in New Zealand for most of our study period. Referral rates of women with HGSC for BRCA mutation testing in New Zealand have not previously been reported. AIMS: To determine the proportion of eligible patients with tubo-ovarian or peritoneal HGSC referred to Auckland Gynaecologic Oncology Centre who were referred for genetic counselling. To determine the number of patients who underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing and the rate of germline BRCA mutations. METHODS: Eligible cases were identified from Auckland Gynaecologic Oncology multidisciplinary meetings database from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014. Genetic referrals sent were checked against the genetic services database to ensure that referrals were received. Genetic counselling clinic attendance, uptake and results of genetic testing were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and four eligible patients were identified with 58 patients referred. Referral rates increased from 37.5% in 2012 to 64.3% in 2014. Of the 58 patients referred, 53 attended genetic counselling, and 49 underwent BRCA mutation testing, of whom 10 (20.4%) tested positive for a germline BRCA mutation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 55.8% of eligible patients were referred for genetic testing; however, referral rates increased with time. This BRCA mutation-positive rate is comparable with current international data.