RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of pregnant individuals report a penicillin allergy, yet most are not truly allergic. Allergy verification during pregnancy is safe and recommended; however, many hospitals lack the infrastructure to execute testing. Our aim was to evaluate the cost of developing and implementing a penicillin allergy referral program for pregnant individuals at an academic institution and to compare costs of care between patients who were referred and not referred through the program. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an economic analysis of our institution's antepartum penicillin allergy referral program. We prospectively collected detailed resource utilization data and conducted the analysis from the program's perspective, accounting for costs related to program development, allergy verification, antibiotic cost, and delivery hospitalization. Costs were compared between patients who were referred for evaluation versus patients who were not referred using bivariate tests as well as quantile regression adjusting for baseline differences. A sensitivity analysis was performed for allergy testing cost. All cost estimates were inflation adjusted to 2021 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: The startup cost of program development and educational initiatives was $19,920, or 86 per patient. The median allergy evaluation cost was $397 (interquartile range: $303-663). There was no significant difference in maternal (median: $13,579 vs. 13,999, p = 0.94) or neonatal (median: $3,565 vs. 3,577, p = 0.55) delivery hospitalization cost or antibiotic cost (median: $1.57 vs. 3.87, p = 0.10) between referred and nonreferred patients. Overall, the total cost per person did not differ significantly between study groups (median: $18,931 vs. 18,314, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The cost of developing a penicillin allergy referral program in pregnancy was modest and did not significantly alter short-term cost of care with potential for long-term cost benefit. Verification of a reported penicillin allergy is an integral part of antibiotic stewardship, and the pregnancy period should be utilized as an important opportunity to perform this evaluation. KEY POINTS: · The cost of developing and implementing an antepartum penicillin allergy referral program is modest.. · Program cost did not significantly alter short-term cost with a potential for long-term cost benefit.. · Penicillin allergy verification is an important part of antibiotic stewardship and should be expanded..
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Penicilinas , Derivación y Consulta , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Penicilinas/economía , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/economía , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Desarrollo de Programa , Centros Médicos AcadémicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than 40% of pregnant patients worldwide are anemic, with at least half resulting from iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Anemia in pregnancy is linked with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Treatment for IDA is iron supplementation; however, the optimal route of administration remains unclear. We sought to investigate whether patients with IDA who received intravenous iron (IVI) had decreased odds of maternal morbidity compared to patients who did not. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with presumed IDA with term deliveries at a tertiary hospital from 2013-2021. Data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record using standardized definitions and billing codes. Patients who received antepartum IVI were compared to patients who did not. The primary outcome was a maternal morbidity composite inclusive of receipt of blood transfusion, hysterectomy, admission to the intensive care unit or death. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression modelling were performed adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 45,345 pregnancies, 5054 (11.1%) met eligibility criteria. Of these, 944 (18.7%) patients received IVI while 4110 (81.3%) did not. Patients who received IVI had higher risk baseline characteristics. They experienced a greater increase in hematocrit from pregnancy nadir to delivery admission (4.5% vs. 3.3%, p < .01). Despite this, patients who received IVI had higher odds of the maternal morbidity composite (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.11-1.95). This finding persisted after adjusting for potential confounders, although the strength of the association became attenuated (aOR 1.37, 95%CI 1.02-1.85). Odds of the morbidity composite were not elevated among patients who received a full IVI treatment course (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.83-1.90). DISCUSSION: Odds of the maternal morbidity composite were increased among patients who received IVI despite greater increases in hematocrit. The effect was attenuated after adjusting for potential confounders and was not significant among patients who completed a full treatment course.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica , Anemia , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Hierro/uso terapéutico , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración IntravenosaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Beta-lactam antibiotics are often clinically indicated in the peripartum period, posing a challenge for pregnant women who report a penicillin allergy. Allergy verification testing is rarely performed during pregnancy, even though most women do not have a true allergy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate a hospital-wide multidisciplinary program introduced in August 2020 to identify, refer, evaluate, and test pregnant women with unverified penicillin allergies and assess its association with maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large academic hospital of all pregnant women with a penicillin allergy documented in the electronic medical record who delivered from September 2020 to October 2021. Data were abstracted by medical record review. Women referred for penicillin allergy evaluation were compared with those who were not. Maternal outcomes were alternative antibiotic (clindamycin or vancomycin) use, postpartum infection, and maternal length of postpartum hospital stay. Neonatal outcomes were intensive care unit admission, postnatal blood draw, antibiotic treatment, and birth hospitalization length of hospital stay. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 689 women with a documented penicillin allergy, 232 (33.7%) were referred for allergy evaluation during the study period. Of those referred, 175 (75.4%) underwent allergy consultation, and of these patients, 167 (95.4%) were considered appropriate for allergy verification testing. Of note, 117 women (70.1%) underwent skin testing with or without graded oral amoxicillin drug challenge, and all but 1 woman (99.1%) were found to be penicillin tolerant. Moreover, 5 additional women were delabeled of their penicillin allergy based on history and pharmacy confirmation of penicillin tolerance subsequent to index reaction. Referred women had a 62% lower likelihood of receiving an alternative antibiotic than those who were not referred, and this significance persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.89). Other maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes were less frequent in those referred, but these associations did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study documented the feasibility, safety, and clinical benefit of an outpatient penicillin allergy referral program for pregnant women. Referred patients were significantly less likely to receive alternative antibiotics; however, more patients are needed to assess whether there are additional clinical benefits.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: An estimated 0.1%-0.8% of obstetric patients require admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) during pregnancy or the puerperium. When neurologic emergencies occur in pregnancy, collaboration between the neurointensivist, obstetric anesthesiologist, and obstetrician is key in minimizing morbidity and mortality. PRINCIPLES: Care of the critically ill pregnant patient mirrors that of the critically ill nonpregnant patient with some minor exceptions. Special care must be taken to consider the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy as well as possible fetal exposure to medical interventions. Timing and method of delivery must be carefully considered when caring for patients with neurologic emergencies. Common neurologic emergencies in pregnancy include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, intracranial neoplasms, noneclamptic seizures, cerebrovascular disorders, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunctions. CONCLUSION: While neurologic emergencies in pregnancy are overall rare, when they do occur, they can be devastating. As in the nonpregnant population, prompt recognition and rapid intervention are crucial in optimizing patient outcomes. When neurologic emergencies occur in pregnancy, maternal and fetal care is optimized through a multidisciplinary care team.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapiaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: The H19 long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) belongs to a highly conserved, imprinted gene cluster involved in embryonic development and growth control. We previously described a novel mechanism whereby the Anti-mullerian hormone (Amh) appears to be regulated by H19. However, the relationship between circulating H19 and markers of ovarian reserve including AMH not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether H19 expression is altered in women with decreased ovarian reserve. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Yale School of Medicine (New Haven, USA) and Gazi University School of Medicine (Ankara, Turkey). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 141 women undergoing infertility evaluation and treatment. INTERVENTION: Collection of discarded blood samples and cumulus cells at the time of baseline infertility evaluation and transvaginal oocyte retrieval, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Serum and cumulus cell H19 expression. RESULTS: Women with diminished ovarian reserve (as determined by AMH) had significantly lower serum H19 expression levels as compared to controls (p < 0.01). Serum H19 was moderately positively correlated with serum AMH. H19 expression was increased 3.7-fold in cumulus cells of IVF patients who demonstrated a high response to gonadotropins, compared to low responders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, we show that downregulation of H19 in serum and cumulus cells is closely associated with decreased ovarian reserve, as measured by decreased AMH levels and reduced oocyte yield at oocyte retrieval. Further study with expanded sample sizes is necessary to determine whether H19 may be of use as a novel biomarker for diminished ovarian reserve.
Asunto(s)
Células del Cúmulo/metabolismo , Infertilidad Femenina/metabolismo , Reserva Ovárica/fisiología , ARN Largo no Codificante/sangre , ARN Largo no Codificante/metabolismo , Adulto , Hormona Antimülleriana/sangre , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Recuento de Células , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/uso terapéutico , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Femenina/genética , Infertilidad Femenina/patología , Recuperación del Oocito , Oocitos/patología , Inducción de la Ovulación , ARN Largo no Codificante/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) causes only 2-4% of all acute hepatitis but has high morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is a risk factor for HSV hepatitis. We describe a case of gestational HSV hepatitis. CASE: A 32-year old woman, gravida 2 para 1, presented at 38 2/7 weeks of gestation with back pain and fetal tachycardia. She became febrile after admission, had spontaneous rupture of membranes, and was delivered by cesarean for malpresentation. Postpartum, she became persistently febrile and developed transaminitis, symptomatic hypotension, and pancytopenia despite antibiotics. Imaging revealed acute liver injury, splenomegaly, pleural effusions, and cardiomyopathy. Serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening identified HSV-1 infection. The patient recovered on acyclovir. There was no evidence of neonatal seroconversion. CONCLUSION: Herpes simplex virus hepatitis causes significant morbidity, and pregnant women are susceptible to severe infections. Pregnant or peripartum women with acute febrile hepatitis require prompt evaluation for HSV with serum PCR screening.