Social Determinants of Health in a Kansas Community Health Center.

Introduction: This study explored the connection between social determinants and patient self-rated health at Health Ministries Clinic (HMC) in a rural Kansas community. Community health centers, like HMC, strive to deliver comprehensive care that addresses patients' social needs. Methods: The authors employed a convenience sampling method to survey HMC patients with appointments from September to December 2018. The authors analyzed the data using Chi-square tests and descriptive statistics in RStudio, considering p <0.05 as significant. Results: Among 200 patient responses, education, income, employment, and insurance status were negatively correlated with self-rated health. Notably, 86.2% of college or graduate school graduates reported positive health ratings, compared to 40% of those who did not finish high school (χ2(12, N = 185) = 25.75, p = 0.012). Lower income individuals (income <$34,000 per year) consistently rated their health poorer than their higher income counterparts (χ2(12, N = 174) = 23.96, p = 0.021). Patients without insurance or with public insurance (Medicaid/ CHIP) perceived their health as worse than those on private health insurance and Medicare (χ2(12, N = 137) = 35.67, p <0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that low educational attainment, income, and lack of health insurance are associated with barriers to healthcare, resulting in poor health outcomes and chronic disease among those with lower socioeconomic status. This underscores the strong association between social determinants and self-rated health among HMC patients. These results can be used by other clinics to assess the needs of their patient population and enhance community health initiatives.

Prenatal Decision-Making in Patients with Limited English Proficiency: What Factors are Involved?

Introduction: A comprehensive definition of culture encompasses shared norms, beliefs, expectations, language, and customs, all of which are crucial considerations when working with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). In this study, the authors examined how language, external influences, and patient-provider relational factors associated with decisional conflict in prenatal care patients. Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to assess decisional conflict related to postpartum contraception, elective induction, and newborn feeding methods. The survey included questions about demographics, communication methods, external influences, and provider trust, and was distributed to prenatal care patients who spoke either English or Spanish. Data analysis involved using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. Results: Out of the 23 respondents, 12 were Spanish-speaking and 11 were English-speaking. Spanish-speaking participants were less likely to have health insurance compared to English-speaking participants (χ2(1, N = 23) = 3.67, p = 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in decisional conflict between English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Religion affected 11 of 23 participants' decisions, while partner expectations influenced 10 of 23 participants. Working with an interpreter and the quality of interpretation were crucial for Spanish-speaking individuals. Most participants (59%) felt that the provider's understanding of the patient's cultural background was important for decision-making. Conclusions: While there was no association between language discordance and decisional conflict, several factors influencing prenatal decision-making were identified. The use and quality of interpretation significantly affected decision-making and should be prioritized for patients with LEP. Religion and partner expectations were found to be highly influential in decision-making. Respondents also emphasized the importance of the provider's understanding of the patient's cultural background.

Physician Dispositions Toward Noninvasive Non-Hormonal Contraception.

Introduction: Evidence-based, nonbiased, counseling on contraceptive options, followed by shared decision-making, is key in facilitating reproductive justice in a diverse population. An estimated 3% of contraceptive users in the United States use fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) for contraception, and demand for these methods is increasing. FABMs can be a highly effective form of family planning when used in accordance with evidence-based protocols. They are preferred by some patients due to medical contraindications to hormonal contraceptives, lack of side effects, religious convictions, preference to avoid hormones or contraceptive devices, improved body literacy, or a combination of the above. FABMs are infrequently covered in medical school curricula and are often perceived by physicians to be of low efficacy. There is an opportunity for improvement of physicians' evidence-based knowledge of FABMs, which has the potential to improve patient understanding of and access to the full menu of family planning options. Methods: A self-administered, cross-sectional survey was distributed to assess physician knowledge and opinions of FABMs by key university contacts. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated for close-ended questions and responses to open-ended questions were analyzed for common themes. Results: A total of 79 participants completed the entire survey. Another 11 submitted partially completed surveys. For completed surveys, questions assessing knowledge of key concepts underlying FABMs, performance by specialty was 55% correct for OB/GYN (n = 16), 55% (n = 47) correct for family medicine, 36% (n = 10) correct for internal medicine, and 35% (n = 6) correct for pediatrics. Negative, neutral, mixed, and positive opinions related to FABMs were represented. Conclusions: There are opportunities to improve physicians' evidence-based knowledge of FABMs; this may improve patient-centered contraceptive care.

The impact of primary care access on autism spectrum disorder awareness in an underserved population.

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) screening do not specifically address safety-net clinics, which provide multidisciplinary healthcare services to underserved patients. This project explored the potential for ASD screening in safety-net clinics by assessing parental perceived knowledge of ASD at JayDoc Free Clinic, a student-run safety-net clinic in Wyandotte County, Kansas. May through December 2022, patients who reported to be the parent of a minor received a demographic survey and a Likert-style questionnaire assessing perceived knowledge of ASD, including understanding the importance of ASD screening and ASD signs and symptoms. Responses were categorized into positive, negative, and unsure. Demographic variables included the minor's primary care provider (PCP) status. Results were analyzed using bivariate analysis, with chi-square tests for significance (p-value ≤ 0.05). Of the 52 participants who completed at least one Likert response, 55.8% reported their child had a PCP. Responses were somewhat balanced with 44.2% positive for understanding the importance of ASD screening and 53.8% positive for understanding ASD signs and symptoms. For understanding the signs and symptoms of ASD, an unsure response (32.7% of responses) was statistically associated with a lack of PCP (p = 0.017). The balance of positive with negative and unsure responses could reflect lack of ASD knowledge and may relate to healthcare inaccessibility. This is consistent with the significant association between lack of PCP and unsure responses for understanding ASD signs and symptoms. ASD screening and education in safety-net clinics like JayDoc could be valuable, particularly for children without a PCP.

Prescription Drug and Alcohol Use Disorders: Opioid Use Disorder.

More than 2 million Americans meet the criteria for opioid use disorder. This epidemic has been driven in part by overprescribing. Physicians have an obligation to respond through better opioid stewardship, universal screening for misuse, referral for management, and provision of opioid use disorder management. Opioid use disorder should be diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria and should not be confused with uncomplicated opioid dependence. The pharmacotherapy of opioid use disorder has three overarching goals: to manage withdrawal, to reduce cravings, and to block the effects of nonmedical opioid use. Three drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of opioid use disorder: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Drug choice is only one component of the management plan for opioid use disorder; outcomes are improved with multicomponent and interprofessional strategies. Screening for opioid use disorder is indicated for certain populations, including pregnant women, but universal screening currently is not recommended. Pregnant women may be treated with methadone or buprenorphine.